Darksoldier360
Member
Plenty of reasons to leave it as is... most of the cost is trenching and installing the conduits / getting the power installed. Removing that is not cost effective if there is any possibility of finishing the site in the future. When tesla vacates the site, then he landlord and Tesla get to choose what happens.
For all we know, PG&E said there was power, then a neighbor got more power installed, and suddenly PG&E said “sorry” we don’t have 1.5 megawatts available at this location, unless you pay us too much money. Also remember the Model 3 launch event... 20 superchargers at the back of the tesla factory
According to my recent drone flight there are still 36 supercharger at the back of the factory, and the 18 cabinets would hint they are real. As for Kato, plans change, cheap to keep them and maybe once the office space by the Dumbarton is done they will decide to switch this building back to a charging site.