buckerine
Member
My Model S nav shows this supercharger on the map now. The Blue Ash supercharger red pin is gone from the map though.
Interesting. I wonder if they’re trying to steer people away from the Tesla store. Sounds like it.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My Model S nav shows this supercharger on the map now. The Blue Ash supercharger red pin is gone from the map though.
The charge rate drops as your charge level increases. If that was from near zero, that's bad. If it was at 75%, not bad. I've seen nothing in the construction of this Supercharger station out of the ordinary that would indicate it'd offer higher-than-typical power.charge rate 197 mi/hr and KW57 seem fast?;Im a one month newbie
My Model S nav shows this supercharger on the map now. The Blue Ash supercharger red pin is gone from the map though.
I will add that I came in at a low battery and saw 397 mi/hr at the start of charge. That is the highest I have ever seen and I have been to about 250 different superchargers. About 350 mi/hr is usually the highest peak I experience.The charge rate drops as your charge level increases. If that was from near zero, that's bad. If it was at 75%, not bad. I've seen nothing in the construction of this Supercharger station out of the ordinary that would indicate it'd offer higher-than-typical power.
I will add that I came in at a low battery and saw 397 mi/hr at the start of charge. That is the highest I have ever seen and I have been to about 250 different superchargers. About 350 mi/hr is usually the highest peak I experience.
Blue- Going forward, it will be more helpful to describe charging speed by the electrical power delivered in kW. Each vehicle type and each vehicle themselves achieves different levels of usage efficiency, i.e. the same amount of stored electricity will allow different ranges to be driven and therefore the kW--> mi/hr conversion is different for each car. Using the kW value (which is the same for every car) will avoid any potential confusion and be clear to each reader who can convert for their particular circumstance for themselves.I’ve charged at the new Oakley charger three times in my 3 and it has been slow every time. Fastest I’ve been able to get (w/ bat SOC @ 50%) was 120 m/h
And, of course, it is highly dependent on the SOC every instance. At 50% SOC I would expect a charging rate of 60-80 kW. It also depends heavily if someone is sharing the charger - e.g. if you were on 3A and someone is already on 3B, if they were charging at a rate higher than 60 kW, 80 kW for this example, you will get what’s leftover.Blue- Going forward, it will be more helpful to describe charging speed by the electrical power delivered in kW. Each vehicle type and each vehicle themselves achieves different levels of usage efficiency, i.e. the same amount of stored electricity will allow different ranges to be driven and therefore the kW--> mi/hr conversion is different for each car. Using the kW value (which is the same for every car) will avoid any potential confusion and be clear to each reader who can convert for their particular circumstance for themselves.
Just be sure not to confuse kW (a measure of power) with kWh (a measure of energy stored).
Possible to reunite an owner with their lost fob, through Tesla or identifying info on or in the fob? Found it on ground next to the SC, says “Model X” on it (I am M3 owner, but nothing else, and don’t have a key fob or any familiarity with them). Quick search of forum wasn’t helpful to me, but perhaps there’s already postings about this.
There's construction going on in the next row of the parking lot. It looks like this location is expanding...
Here is a link to the permit. Cagis ezTrak-Record Details
Looks like more stalls but only 150kw
Yep, sorry for the mislead! Drove by today and saw the EA stations (installed but not turned on). It seems like an odd choice of location but maybe will offer overflow for Teslas once the CCS adapter becomes available.Not an expansion of the supercharger. This is going to be a new Electrify America station with 6 charging spots. The description in the permit doesn't match the way that superchargers are normally described in permits, but it does align with how I've seen DCFC stations from other charging station providers described. And a check of EA's map shows a future location planned for this Meijer.
EA has the same infrastructure needs and siting goals as Tesla and they are dealing with the same host business with the same limitations on suitable siting, so it's not that surprising that they end up in the same area. It happens fairly frequently that they end up side by side when both companies put chargers at the same site.It seems like an odd choice of location
I saw the new EA install going in recently as well. Cincy gas station chains must really be behind the times if EA is ending up at Meijer too. These Meijer fast charging locations suck for roadtrips. Off the highway, through a huge parking lot, no easily accessibly amenities. In PA and up north in Ohio we have Sheetz, GetGo putting fast chargers in which is a far better experience. Grocery store locations make sense for in-town drivers without home charging, so it's nice that they exist, but Cincinnati (and Indiana and Kentucky) desperately need some V3s at places like UDF and Thorntons as well.EA has the same infrastructure needs and siting goals as Tesla and they are dealing with the same host business with the same limitations on suitable siting, so it's not that surprising that they end up in the same area. It happens fairly frequently that they end up side by side when both companies put chargers at the same site.