You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hi, all. I'm new here. I am also in Vegas (but it's because I live here). I used to live in Crescent City and my in-laws still do, and I asked them to take a look every so often and send some pics if anything happens. My mom-in-law says nothing's going on yet.
I asked them to take a look every so often and send some pics if anything happens.
Hi, all. I'm new here. I am also in Vegas (but it's because I live here). I used to live in Crescent City and my in-laws still do, and I asked them to take a look every so often and send some pics if anything happens. My mom-in-law says nothing's going on yet.
ISTM Crescent City and Eureka make no sense without first doing the SCs to the south of them, north of Petaluma. It's not as if there isn't lots of scenic (if often fog- or rain-shrouded) coastline lined with quaint B&Bs and historic hotels in Oregon, so I don't see a lot of Oregonians heading down to California for that. I'd think they need to build north from Petaluma, not south from Grant's Pass.No word, and i just spoke with a city engineer from Eureka tonight and they haven't heard back from Tesla about the Eureka location. His cousin has an S and drove up from Atlanta so he understands the need for the Superchargers. pretty cool
ISTM Crescent City and Eureka make no sense without first doing the SCs to the south of them, north of Petaluma. It's not as if there isn't lots of scenic (if often fog- or rain-shrouded) coastline lined with quaint B&Bs and historic hotels in Oregon, so I don't see a lot of Oregonians heading down to California for that. I'd think they need to build north from Petaluma, not south from Grant's Pass.
I think we're in agreement that Willits (or maybe Laytonville; better spacing but poorer connections. Leggett's a bit far) and Eureka (my vote would be for Arcata at the 299 junction) are needed before CC. Alternatively, if you were to put 3 in between Petaluma and CC before CC, you could have one around Garberville/Redway, and move Willits down to Calpella. That would give you spacing of about 84, 84, 77 and 75 miles.hmm, not sure I get that? I think Eureka makes the most sense since you can do Petaluma-Eureka (barely) and Eureka-Grants pass is no problem. Willits is needed more than CC but Eureka is also needed more than CC if you come over 299 or 36 from I-5. There are tons of Oregon plates around here all year and way more in the summer, it is mostly sunny and beautiful May - October for the past 10 years.
I think we're in agreement that Willits (or maybe Laytonville; better spacing but poorer connections. Leggett's a bit far) and Eureka (my vote would be for Arcata at the 299 junction) are needed before CC. Alternatively, if you were to put 3 in between Petaluma and CC before CC, you could have one around Garberville/Redway, and move Willits down to Calpella. That would give you spacing of about 84, 84, 77 and 75 miles.
I think we're in agreement that Willits (or maybe Laytonville; better spacing but poorer connections. Leggett's a bit far) and Eureka (my vote would be for Arcata at the 299 junction) are needed before CC. Alternatively, if you were to put 3 in between Petaluma and CC before CC, you could have one around Garberville/Redway, and move Willits down to Calpella. That would give you spacing of about 84, 84, 77 and 75 miles.