You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm surprised to see 145kW at all, but (and maybe this all goes without saying) there are a number of factors that go into charging power, including battery temperature, state of charge and losses in the cables, and obviously the power the charging station is capable of delivering. Longer or narrower (lower gauge) cables are going to create more resistance and thus more power loss to heat.Chargers on I-10 updated.
Saw 145 kW at Junction, 136 at Ozona, 137 at Fort Stockton.
Previous best was 118 kW at any of these three.
So: why is the Fort Stockton display different than the other two?
Does the newly installed 2019.20.4.1 have anything to do with this?
Isn't this just the difference in having the display set to Energy rather than Distance? Or did I entirely miss the point?why is the Fort Stockton display different than the other two?
Tesla Remote app shows both - why not show both on the dash display?
I'm wondering this too since I'm driving right now. If not, then I'll really have to conserve as much energy in order to make it from Van Horn to Ozona.Anything known about Fort Stockton showing as off-line on the Nav app map?
This shouldn't be too tough in a long range Tesla. The other direction is a different story.I'm wondering this too since I'm driving right now. If not, then I'll really have to conserve as much energy in order to make it from Van Horn to Ozona.
Did Van Horn actually get fixed?On-board nav shows "Temporarily Closed" due to a pedestal damaged back on 01/08.
Despite what the nav shows, at least four pedestals were working yesterday afternoon.
Alternative is the VW penance station at Walmart, but you'll need an adapter.
I notified Tesla, told them it made us look bad. We'll see if they respond as quickly as they did at VanHorn.