1. Tesla doesn't install destination chargers at commercial sites. Not that those sites don't install them, but the applicant would be whoever their electrician is, not Tesla.
Who knows who is paying for it or conditioning its approval (Target?) but the Chico site that is planned has 4 destination chargers (2 Tesla 2 Clipper) to be installed along with the superchargers, the destination chargers are also integrated and part of the superchargers install, buddied right up next to the superchargers.. This might be more of a requirement from Target (the owner) than Tesla's wish but who knows.
Oops, I guess I wasn't that clear there. Tesla certainly does on occasion install HPWCs and/or J1772 EVSEs as part of supercharger installations. I only meant that they don't do it for the Destination Charging program where they are giving a business the EVSEs and then the business arranges for the installation. The point was that the Richmond permit was pulled directly by someone from Tesla. That doesn't happen in the Destination Charging program where Tesla is only reimbursing installation costs not contracting/completing the work themselves. The context for my original comment was that the permit itself didn't have any information explicitly identifying the site as a supercharger. So @Pluto was questioning whether it might actually be a Destination Charging installation instead. I was just arguing that the fact that Tesla themselves pulled the permit was a piece of evidence for why I felt sure this was actually a supercharger even though the permit wasn't explicit about it.
Finally something good enough to get you to make a comment, huh?
Nice spotting! 
Yes. V3s haven’t yet come out for any other than the test stations, so this will definitely be v2
))
