Gerardf
Active Member
<< Left out the quote in order not to bother those who blocked you with your post >>>
It all means Supercharging H/W is build in on all models. Same as with the MS-60.
It is your interpretation that such means it is free-for-live on the base model. So all the future Model-3 customers can get Free Supercharging.. if they BUY the option to activate it. Anything else is your interpretation. No matter how many links you might dig up (that all tell you the same as I am telling you here actually).
Everybody who made a reservation prefers having a 35k base price with optional SuperCharging for a price (say 2k) over a baseprice that is 2k higher with SuperCharging activated by default.
In case you are not happy with that, you can easily get a refund on your reservation at any time, enough happy takers for your place in line. (And in case you do not even have an Model-3 reservation.. what is your problem anyway ??)
Even with an 2k SuC activation price added , that would still be lower than the Bolt, that will not have level-3 charging in the base price, but (as I understand) will need an optional extra for 50 kW charging capability on top of their 37k base price. And NO SuperCharging network at ANY price as an option. Ever.
So what is your issue here ? How is Tesla a bad company here ?? Or Mr. Musk a bad CEO ??
Please go to the GM forum with your nitpicking ! As soon as GM (any other vendor) has a 120 kWh network and offers at access lower prices than Tesla you can return to complain about Tesla and Mr. Musk on this forum.
The car 's the final option / price list is not even ready.
It that so hard to understand / accept ? Or do you keep pushing this for other reasons ?
To my personal opinion you are probably simply trolling. (and with an agenda as you show in your posts on other forums)
Last edited: