The peak rate is rather meaningless. It peaks only for seconds before it drops rapidly. What matter is the time it takes to recharge say 150 miles of rated range. Yes they increased the peak rate of the old batteries to 130 (or maybe even more now) but that way it tapers down has been reduced pretty bad. The reduction came long before the fires, BTW.
I haven't see SuC rates above 80kW at a V2 Supercharger since June 2019, but I haven't had many opportunities for testing. The last V2 station I've been to had several pedestals out of commission (Redondo Beach); so our 2013 S85 has never seen rates above 112kW. I'll have to give it another try before my next road trip. If it's slow then our Tesla will be relegated to Level 2 charging, will stay home for local driving, and I'll have to fire up the old TDI.
I thought the slowdown via software updated happened in July around the release of the V3 SuC. As for chronology, the Tesla fire in
Shanghai I was referring to happed on April 22, 2019, followed by a
Tesla charging fire while SuC in Belgium. According to Eletrek, there were 4 fires within 2 months. Older Model S 85s started seeing longer Supercharging sessions around June 2019 after the 2019.20.1 firmware update; I believe it coincided with lost range which many have speculated as a result of a software limited upper capacity.
A Better Route Planner has a graph of the difference, stating their benchmark of charging from 10kW to 50kW taking about 5 minutes longer. However, they did not measure the increased time to recharge to 80% or beyond:
I hope Tesla can figure out how to safely restore both the battery capacity and recharging speed for quicker recharging, but we have no idea what they're working on or why they made these changes to begin with...again, their communication is pretty poor.