b team
Member
That’s not the post I responded to. I think you are in a different conversation.I specifically said setting the price properly. I am not sure where creditors is coming from. This is about avoiding the a Tesla ban not financial fraud.
That’s not the post I responded to. I think you are in a different conversation.I specifically said setting the price properly. I am not sure where creditors is coming from. This is about avoiding the a Tesla ban not financial fraud.
Agreed, and I’m not saying every buyback ends this way by a long shot. But this one seems quite obviously a strategic decision on Tesla’s part to make this particular customer go away.Just because you have a buyback, doesn't mean you automatically get blacklisted. There are tons of owners out there that did buybacks and just went right back into another Tesla.
Edit: Doesn't mean there isn't more to this story. It sounds like there was some friction there interacting with the lawyer.
If Tesla chooses to advertise loudly that a car has a certain range, then the car should have that advertised range, at least through the warranty period, or it should be specified that the range is for the new car and then the amount of expected loss should be disclosed. .
You had me right up to the very end.Tesla knows how to run a tight ship.
Part ways and learn from your experience.
As an outsider looking in I would not want to do business with you for anything.
You sound like an entitled whiner that will never be satisfied.
Smart Idea.
Although if I was OP and Tesla wouldn't allow me to buy a car UNDER my name I wouldn't stress it and I'd take my money elsewhere. They obviously don't want his business and I wouldn't want to give my money to them.
There, I fixed it for you.It’s not really fraud ifdone rightyou don't get caught.
It's actually pretty simple. Any customer who can navigate their way into a buyback is not welcome by a company which has as many issues as Tesla. If that customer starts sharing and educating other customers how to do that, that customer has to go for sure. No different than cult leaders not allowing individuals to join (or expelling them) who show too much independent thought and/or leadership qualities.Agreed, and I’m not saying every buyback ends this way by a long shot. But this one seems quite obviously a strategic decision on Tesla’s part to make this particular customer go away.
70% number is Tesla's new warranty, as of Jan 2020, it doesn't (or rather, it shouldn't) apply to older cars. Unfortunately older terms has no number, so strictly speaking (like Tesla likes to interpret their obligations) ANY degradation could be covered.If the car had 70-80% capacity left, the car was within spec of the warranty, no? If so, you wanted special treatment outside of your agreement, and apparently were forceful about it and you make your issues public. I would banned you as well.
Perhaps you have a different definition of "retaliate" than the rest of the English-speaking world has agreed upon:...it appears that Tesla retaliates against people that post negative things (yet distressingly accurate?) about the firm.
After this situation I reached out to a few contacts and found that I am not the only one that Tesla has banned for having arbitration / lemon claims. I can't speak for those other (former) owners but It seems that this is a strategy that Tesla legal employs with at least some regular cadence.
ExactlyWe aren’t obligated to sell you a car and we don’t believe selling you another car is in either of our interests.
It's the PRINCIPLE. With all due respect, it appears that Tesla retaliates against people that post negative things (yet distressingly accurate?) about the firm. That's sad, if true . . . and really unbecoming too. Far better to just do a LOT more root cause analysis on problems (yellow screen issues, etc.) and ferret them out early, rather than punish the messengers.
After eight MS's, we too are getting frustrated with far too many quality and service issues, and we are back in Tesla Service Hell (again) with our brand new MS, yet we are fully and completely in line with Tesla's mission. WE JUST WANT TESLA TO BE A BETTER COMPANY.
One very important way to get there is listen to your customers that complain. They are an excellent indicator of where resources and attention are needed, not to punish, but to improve the process and employee knowledge. "Firing" customers that do so is remarkably short-sighted. Another way for Tesla to "win" would be to compete in this annual event--there's far too much that Elon and Tesla don't know about Quality: Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award - Wikipedia
Part ways and learn from your experience.
As an outsider looking in I would not want to do business with you for anything.
You sound like an entitled whiner that will never be satisfied.
Hah!Not only is banning you as a customer going to be effective for Tesla as a business.
Having you as a customer with a competitor is like killing 2 birds with one stone.
Tesla knows how to run a tight ship.