You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, the author has it right. The main application for this installation is frequency response, which is high power, low duration application, hence power rating is multiples of the energy capacity. the multiplier you apparently have in mind ( say Energy capacity = 4 x power rating) is for the battery installations designed to make solar dispatchable.Samsung scores a big battery installation in South Australia:
Samsung chosen for new 30MW battery storage facility in S.A.
The article says 30MW / 8 MWh. I'm kind of assuming the author has that backwards - that it's really 8MW / 30 MWh.
Its main function will be to provide fast frequency response services in case of a fault, but it will also be able to provide back-up power in the event of a blackout, effectively creating a renewable energy based micro-grid, which AGL boss Andy Vesey said last year was the best way to ensure reliable supply.
Interesting (non-) update on the large Victoria, Australia storage project. The winners still have not been announced even though the project completion deadline is January 1 — only 2.5 months away. Storage on hold as Victoria still reviewing battery tender
Some are speculating that winners have been chosen but contract negotiations are ongoing. The short time window may suggest Tesla is going to play a significant role, but that is speculative at this point.
Also a 4 MW Tesla battery was installed in the UK recently. UK aggregator Kiwi’s Tesla battery will provide 24/7 frequency response. KiWi Power, the demand side management company that installed it, “has now begun an extensive roll-out of similar batteries across the UK within the commercial and industrial (C&I) sectors” although I could not tell from the article if all of the batteries will be supplied by Tesla.
IMO the signs are that Tesla will sell all the Powerpacks and Powerwalls it can make for the foreseeable future.
Good discussion on this.Elon on Twitter has suggested Tesla could rebuild Puerto Rico's electricity infrastructure with solar and batteries. This could get interesting ....
Elon Musk on Twitter
Scientists and energy experts have said that a distributed grid that is not reliant on a single power plant for energy generation, could help vulnerable island regions like the Caribbean withstand powerful storms like Hurricanes Irma or Maria. The Caribbean is also most vulnerable to hurricanes, which are predicted to gain in strength with each passing year because of global warming.
Solar panels can feed their power into batteries and be linked together into local or regional power grids, and are also well suited for tropical regions. The technology could save the U.S. Virgin Islands millions — savings that could be passed on to residents — which in turn could boost the local economy as dollars once used for utilities could be spent elsewhere. Cheaper energy costs could also entice industries to the USVI that are heavily reliant on its use.
“When we are facing the sort of infrastructure destruction we have seen this hurricane season, it only makes sense to give some pause before reinvesting in the exact same system that proved to vulnerable,” Gwen Holdmann, who directs the Alaska Center for Energy and Power at the University of Alaska at Fairbanks, told The Washington Post recently. “If [Puerto Rico’s] system were redesigned around microgrids incorporating local power production, there would still be losses, but the number and duration of outages due to severe weather events would decrease.”
In the Dominican Republic AES Energy Storage installed two 10 MW battery systems at power plants owned by its AES Dominicana affiliate.
AES’ Andres and Los Mina storage facilities, which entered service in February and May, were able to provide frequency control to the grid, allowing the power plants more optimally, the company said. All of AES Dominicana’s plant in the DR remained online during the storms.
“AES Dominicana’s energy storage arrays enhanced the Dominican grid during a most trying time, helping keep vital power resources online,” John Zahurancik, president of AES Energy Storage, said in a statement. “Not only does energy storage improve reliability of the grid on a daily basis, this experience demonstrates how it can add to overall resilience under extreme conditions.”
The project in Australia aims to bring down the cost of renewable energy production and help secure a steady supply of renewable power to the grid regardless of weather conditions.
It will use batteries supplied by U.S. electric carmaker Tesla Inc(TSLA) and is expected to generate enough power to supply more than 35,000 average Australian homes.
The Australian project will consist of 43.2 MW of wind power capacity using twelve of Vestas' V136-3.6 MW turbines, 15 MW of solar and 2 MW of battery storage.
and as a reminder- now 3 weeks
Vestas to build first large-scale battery storage project for wind, solar, will be using Tesla Powerpacks.
It combines 43.2MW of wind, 15MW of single axis tracking solar PV, and a 4MWh lithium-ion battery storage system supplied by US giant Tesla. Construction is expected to take a little over 12 months, creating 100 jobs during this time, and the project is expected to be fully operational before the end of 2018.
“We believe Kennedy Energy Park will demonstrate how effectively wind, solar and storage can be combined to provide low cost, reliable and clean energy for Australia’s future”, said Windlab CEO Roger Price in comments on Thursday.
As noted above, it is the first phase of a potential $2 billion-plus, 1200MW renewable energy precinct planned for North Queensland to exploit the region’s “exceptional” wind resource and “excellent solar irradiation pattern.”
“The second phase of Kennedy, phase II or ‘Big Kennedy’ as we like to call it, is 100% owned by Windlab and will provide up to 1,200MW of wind energy, critical in balancing the large amounts of solar generation that will be connected to the Queensland grid as it moves toward 50% renewable energy capacity,” said Price.
“The fact that wind generation in Queensland is biased towards the late afternoon, evening and night makes it ideal for matching large amounts of solar generation, thereby reducing the need for storage and other peaking capacity across the network. This is why Big Kennedy is a central component of the Queensland Government’s Powering North Queensland Plan.”
Wonder if Tesla can start building batteries in Buffalo, not just PV?
I asked this on another thread but it seems more appropriate here:
Is Tesla giving the power packs to Puerto Rico for free? I've tried to find any reference but everything seems to focus on Tesla providing a solution. Nothing indicating that Tesla will be making $. Corporate altruism is wonderful when you get big enough. Not sure we're there yet.
Thank you for posting this -- very interesting summary of all of the challenges to getting this done (the headline doesn't do the article justice).
The author's conclusions that solar could come from many sources (especially China) but that batteries will need to come primarily from Tesla seems right since no other battery manufacturer will be at the same scale/cost as Tesla barring some unexpected developments.
If he is right that 55 GWh of storage is needed and assuming Tesla supplies 75%, that would require a substantial percentage of the production of GF1 between now and 2020, assuming Tesla is able to reach the ambitious 150 GWh/year pack production goal that Elon has mentioned.
If the author's numbers are right and some massive deal is struck, it could accelerate plans for the next generation of gigafactories (GF 3, 4, 5 etc.), although given the normal pace of politics and the problems Puerto Rico faces this may not be resolved as quickly as it should. Will be interesting to see how this unfolds, especially how the financial, political and regulatory issues are handled. For the sake of the people of Puerto Rico I really hope they can get this done.
No, the author has it right. The main application for this installation is frequency response, which is high power, low duration application, hence power rating is multiples of the energy capacity. the multiplier you apparently have in mind ( say Energy capacity = 4 x power rating) is for the battery installations designed to make solar dispatchable.
I would also note pretty high cost of this system.
Another factor in high cost is probably high power rating of the battery - 3.75C.
I asked this on another thread but it seems more appropriate here:
Is Tesla giving the power packs to Puerto Rico for free? I've tried to find any reference but everything seems to focus on Tesla providing a solution. Nothing indicating that Tesla will be making $. Corporate altruism is wonderful when you get big enough. Not sure we're there yet.