mvotb
Member
Tesla forced me on to V10 2019.32.12.1 last night, from V8. I am REALLY PISSED OFF. So much for unplugging the seat Sorka. 2016 S 60 W/75 battery that I did not unlock. Did I mention I am REALLY PISSED OFF?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Date | Owner | Notes |
---|---|---|
2019-05-29 | HankLloydRight | Post 3703262 |
2019-06-07 | FlatSix911 | Post 3732560 |
2019-06-15 | swegman | Post 3755529 |
2019-06-22 | Seattle | Post 3775297 |
2019-10-12 | KnightOwl | Post 4106329 |
2019-10-12 | mvotb | Post 4106930 |
2019-10-12 | ️ELECTROMAN️ | Post 4107444 |
I don't think they need any more reasons to deny claims! When 'contact with its environment' is grounds for claim denial, I think Tesla are well covered.So far we have never heard of Tesla denying anyone warranty service because they didn't perform the (now unnecessary) annual service.
I don't think they need any more reasons to deny claims! When 'contact with its environment' is grounds for claim denial, I think Tesla are well covered.
Not really new.... just all stuff going around on here. eg: Model 3 paint claims - no paint / rust being explained by Tesla as exposure to air and therefore normal wear and tear. If 'exposure to air / gas' is a warranty exclusion, then no need for any more exclusions.Is this a new thing somewhere else?
You might as well do it. I haven't read anything about V10 being any worse than V9.I have a pending software update (I'm still on v9).. I wonder if they'll do it for me again?
You might as well do it. I haven't read anything about V10 being any worse than V9.
If you just got the update Sunday (10/13) then you might not have had a chance to charge your car yet. Do you notice a significantly lower range (number of miles) at 90% or 100% charge?I got my forced update (from V8 ver. 2018.34.1 to 2019.32.12.1) yesterday morning. Then 12 hours later I got another update notice for 2019.32.12.2 (which, as many have reported, fired off the car alarm when the update was 80% installed!)
Resigned myself to the clunkier V9/V10 UI, but at least I can keep the rear cam on screen (which was the deal killer back when V9 first appeared, but later "Mostly" fixed). My 90D lease is ending, so I need to bite the bullet anyway when I get a new Raven.
Date | Owner | Version | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
2019-05-29 | HankLloydRight | 2019.16.2 | Post 3703262 |
2019-06-07 | FlatSix911 | ? | Post 3732560 |
2019-06-15 | swegman | 2019.16.3.2 | Post 3755529 |
2019-06-22 | Seattle | ? | Post 3775297 |
2019-10-12 | KnightOwl | ? | Post 4106329 |
2019-10-12 | mvotb | 2019.32.12.1 | Post 4106930 |
2019-10-13 | ️ELECTROMAN️ | ? | Post 4107444 |
2019-10-13 | Azathoth | 2019.32.12.1 | Post 4109393 |
2019-10-14 | immolated | 2019.32.12.1 | Post 4109864 |
You might as well do it. I haven't read anything about V10 being any worse than V9.
TPMS button reset missing (important when you have 2+ sets of wheels / tires)
Not planning to keep a definitive list of owners who have had updates forced on them, but since two more showed up today, I'm posting this summary as a reminder. The recent activity suggests that Tesla may eventually be intending to force all owners to update, perhaps so they can wind down legacy support systems. Unfortunately, that also means forcing Model S/X owners to accept usability and performance regressions introduced by the v9 redesign and newly-imposed battery/range limits, without prior information or consent.
Date Owner Version Notes 2019-05-29 HankLloydRight 2019.16.2 Post 3703262 2019-06-07 FlatSix911 ? Post 3732560 2019-06-15 swegman 2019.16.3.2 Post 3755529 2019-06-22 Seattle ? Post 3775297 2019-10-12 KnightOwl ? Post 4106329 2019-10-12 mvotb 2019.32.12.1 Post 4106930 2019-10-13 ️ELECTROMAN️ ? Post 4107444 2019-10-13 Azathoth 2019.32.12.1 Post 4109393 2019-10-14 immolated 2019.32.12.1 Post 4109864
Besides the more clicks, it's just more distracting in general. The old split screen made so much more sense. I'm sure I'll get use to it, but the new changes made to V9 /V10 are ridiculous.I'm sure I posted it before, but I think it deserves a revisit -
IMO the V9 V10 interface is less safe to drive with because it takes more "clicks" to accomplish everything I do with one click on V8 (except call up the media app) and most (if not all) targets are smaller.
I know because I drove a loaner for 2 weeks with it and I drove poorly because of it.