It makes no sense to build a car that
only lasts so long "for the future" though. Zero sense. I don't know if this is why the car is the way it is (I'm mostly refusing to believe it). We can already see this with EV charging networks - "it will get better", absolutely, but look at the time it's taken and I
still can't just pick a direction and drive. Charger availability fully dictates where (and sometimes when) I can go. Now to say it might be designed for needing high speed uninterrupted connectivity 100% of the time despite no carrier wanting to take on that huge infrastructure development because it's not at all in their interest? Good luck, Tesla. (and it won't have Starlink in the future, Elon's previously addressed that question). Most hilariously, I've heard assertions that highways need mm-wave 5G nodes along the whole thing to enable vehicle autonomy. We've hardly strung
lights along all major routes let alone high speed connectivity!
From my
very biased perspective I also don't agree these are edge cases, but again I'm mostly in the West. Mountains interfere with signal and it's hard to have perfect connectivity everywhere (and honestly, I don't expect it - signal gaps are fine,
every other device I've used handles that as gracefully as possible). I get the impression mountains and signal gaps are rare for most folks? But even driving through completely flat parts of the US, I've been hours without signal.
Not having a heated steering wheel because of robotaxi reasons is a take I haven't heard before
One of my favourite examples of Tesla half-ass engineering, to add to your good point, is Sentry. Hear me out. 300W of power to run a glorified dashcam? That's a disaster. Clearly a hype feature that it was not at all designed to support optimally. Ditto for Summon Standby. So unfortunate, but so successful. Like you mentioned, other manufacturers have a shot of doing things much better (unfortunately, this is more or less just doing things "the old way").