ItsNotAboutTheMoney
Well-Known Member
Haha - one question. What type of lawyer is decent or is there any decent lawyer??
What exactly do you mean by decent?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha - one question. What type of lawyer is decent or is there any decent lawyer??
Should we start a separate tread for Lawyer jokes? :biggrin: (applied only to the ones that are like that)
What exactly do you mean by decent?
While it certainly wouldn't be the most common way to get a medical license, he could have gotten interested in the field while in the service and pursued his MD upon his return. My wife went to med school with someone who did that.What irks me more (and there is a VERY strong chance this is a coincidence and not his profile, so I'm not going to link it) but the linkedin profile I found that matched the name, location, career field, and background military service has him listed as a retired staff Sargent Med Tech... not a Colonel Flight doc... but probably not him and just a coincidence.
I'm surprised he posted publicly at all. What we've seen here is proof of why any decent lawyer instructs their clients not to speak publicly about pending litigation.20 hours, almost 100 posts, and nary a peep from Dr OP...
I guess what I was getting at was that the LinkedIn profile claimed to be retired at a much lower rank than he claims on the attorney's website. Again, probably 2 different people or something. I just thought if he was a retired colonel, there was a chance his bio is posted somewhere. Those can be interesting reads. No luck though, all that came up was a LinkedIn profile.While it certainly wouldn't be the most common way to get a medical license, he could have gotten interested in the field while in the service and pursued his MD upon his return. My wife went to med school with someone who did that.
I'm surprised he posted publicly at all. What we've seen here is proof of why any decent lawyer instructs their clients not to speak publicly about pending litigation.
montgom626 Banned AgainI see that montgom626 has been banned again. I went back through his posts to see what he did this time, and it was more of the same:
- directly insulting and disrespectful comments to other members,
- denigrating gm-volt.com founder Dr. Lyle Dennis,
- intentionally abrasive remarks,
- really out of the blue volatility, and
- repeated attempts to sow conflict.
A careful examination of his posts suggests that these are personal failures that likely pervade other aspects of his life (i.e. it is unlikely that he is an infiltrator, he's just a screw up).
If the moderators let him back in yet again, you newbies are forewarned to keep your guard up around him.
And a rebuttal to the rebuttal. Essentially a non-rebuttal with no content.
The Law According to VINCE MEGNA: Client's Response to Tesla's Blog Post
You may want to have your attorney advise you as to what an "allegation" is. Tesla's blog post contains no "allegation" regarding the fuse. It does, however, report events regarding the fuse:
"...they determined that the car's front trunk had been opened immediately before the fuse failure on each of these occasions. (The fuse is accessed through the front trunk.) Ultimately, Tesla service applied non-tamper tape to the fuse switch. From that point on, the fuse performed flawlessly."
Now you may feel this makes some implications, but it is not an allegation. If you also believe their account to be factual you may draw your own conclusion, as I have."
My reply to that blog post:
Also isn't it super wierd for an attorney not to forbid his client about talking about a case that is going to litigation??? And on top of that the lawyer makes a blog post him self??? Is this not remarkable?
MikeC,
Your suggestion to buy this guy out is the expedient path but it sets a precedent that you can buy the car, drive it for a while, intentionally create fud (damaging to Tesla's reputation) then force Tesla to buy back the product. This rewards behavior that is bad in way too many ways. It may be harder and more painful to deal with this first attempt at "Lemmon Law Scamming" but I think it will pay dividends in the long run. It is a trick you learn when you have been run around the block a few times in that what appears to be the easiest and best cost based decision turns out to be a bad long term business decision.
Put differently, I think our Doc poked the wrong hornet's nest
And a rebuttal to the rebuttal. Essentially a non-rebuttal with no content.
The Law According to VINCE MEGNA: Client's Response to Tesla's Blog Post
If not an allegation then surely an insinuation. The tamper tape preceds the fuse stopping to fail. The opening of the frunk preceds the failure of the fuse on several occasions. These temporal correlations suggest, but do not prove, a causal relationship between these events. In my book though there really isn't a better explanation than tempering, is there?
Also isn't it super wierd for an attorney not to forbid his client about talking about a case that is going to litigation??? And on top of that the lawyer makes a blog post him self??? Is this not remarkable?
Don't spend a dime until you have the agreement in hand. Court is a waste of time.