SebastianR
Active Member
Great discussion here! Nope, I don't think that Tesla should do "marketing spin" and redefine measures for distance. And yes, iPads/iPhones are sold by number of GB (note that I referred to iPods way back when...). I guess the reason is that 1000 songs for the iPod made sense while aa songs, xx hours video, yy photos and zz apps becomes a complicated and convoluted measure for iPhones and iPhads. So effectively iPads today are sold in "small, medium and large" categories that happen to be named by the GB sizes they (theoretically) may carry.
I also think that Tesla should keep the battery numbers to indicate the small / medium / large category. But a 85kWh battery may last you for 265 miles and then YMMV (quite literally) - so I think it is "more honest" to advertise 85kWh then 265 miles.
So while I agree that most(?) of us do care a great deal about miles, kWh, kWh/miles, 1C charging, AC, DC and more, I'm wondering if delivering the message in a different way to break the "gas station" thinking would help.
With regards to the charging times, for instance I typically answer they don't matter as long as they are not longer than the time you sleep (since you can sleep while a car charges, but can't sleep at a gas station).
I also think that Tesla should keep the battery numbers to indicate the small / medium / large category. But a 85kWh battery may last you for 265 miles and then YMMV (quite literally) - so I think it is "more honest" to advertise 85kWh then 265 miles.
So while I agree that most(?) of us do care a great deal about miles, kWh, kWh/miles, 1C charging, AC, DC and more, I'm wondering if delivering the message in a different way to break the "gas station" thinking would help.
With regards to the charging times, for instance I typically answer they don't matter as long as they are not longer than the time you sleep (since you can sleep while a car charges, but can't sleep at a gas station).