Do you have any objective car mag tests of this? I can't seem to find any (only a C&D estimate for 3.4, and Audis official 3.8 number)
Still, if that's real (esp. if it's not requiring a bunch of special launch mode, prepped surface, etc to get it) then that'd be fair... and we'd finally have
one example.
Still pretty damn far from "most manufacturers" but better than 0 I guess
I think most folks would find 20-25% a significant price difference but YMMV.... and that's gonna approach 30-35% if the P ends up eligible for the tax credit (which isn't clear yet they've moved the cap around a few times)
As I say though you could choose to consider that comparable and ignore the price gap-- that'd still put you at 2 manufacturers out of dozens offering a "comparable" car with a comparable 0-60.
Still miles from "THE COMPETITION IS COMING" or "most manufacturers"
I don't think anybody has disagreed with that? Though a few have pointed out that's of no real world difference outside of a race track or perhaps the autobahn.
The issue is there's a months long backlog of orders.
There's literally no motivation or economic benefit to Tesla to changing the car right now when demand significantly outstrips supply.
A refresh once that's no longer the case would make sense? Now though I can't really see any business case for it.
Added bonus- this gives them time with the Plaid S and eventually X to work out any bugs/kinks for the higher RPM motors before mass-producing them for some future 3/Y plaid variants.
AFAIK the main reason the Plaid is so fast at high speeds is the new 20,000 rpm motor- not the battery pack changes.