You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Finally tested the aircon power usage. Did it at night so it wouldn't have been under much stress. Ambient temp around 24C, interior temp read the same. I sat in the passenger seat and used the app to turn the aircon on. Aircon was set to 22C, auto mode. Screen was left off. The car is plugged in to the wall charger, and on standby to start charging at 8:00am the next day.
I used the Tesla app (Powerwall section) to monitor power consumption. As a baseline, with me sitting in the car and the aircon off the house pulls around 400W.
View attachment 474819
Started the test at 8:22pm by turning the aircon on via the app; this increases power usage by about 2kW.
View attachment 474820
It didn't take long for the interior temperature to stabilize at 22C. As it ran, the power consumption would fluctuate somewhat but only rarely would it drop below about 1.5kW. And when it did, only very briefly. Kind of like this:
View attachment 474821
...and then 12 seconds later:
View attachment 474822
After ~15 minutes this pattern hadn't changed. I switched the aircon off at 8:40pm and the house went back to its baseline power usage:
View attachment 474825
View attachment 474823
So in theory you can gain about 10% in range by keeping the A/C off (assuming you drive the car for ~4 hours at ~100kph, you'll end up spending 6-8kWh on aircon). That seems to align with my actual driving experience, as I get a reported average of ~170Wh/km with the aircon on and ~150 Wh/km with it off (for local driving on approximately the same routes).
For comparison, here's what my 7.4kW split-system/inverter aircon looks like when switched on during a warm January day:
View attachment 474824
It definitely pulls a higher peak load than the Model 3 (~4.5kW), but then settles in at the same consumption (or slightly better, at ~1.3 kW after accounting for baseline usage) to cool a much larger area under much warmer conditions.
If anyone is interested I can graph the Model 3 A/C using the same tool (just have to redo the test during the day; the Enphase thing can't see nightime consumption because of the Tesla batteries).
Sure, but it would have even better range if the AC wasn’t such a power hog. Having a huge battery to run off is not an excuse to be profligate and think “near enough is good enough”. Other BEV manufacturers do much better on this score, Tesla should be utterly offended this is the case and resolve to do much better.You need to remember that the car uses an AC to DC rectifier to provide shore power. If you were actually curious you could also use scan my Tesla using the canbus connections. Alternatively on the other forums people have investigated this already. I wouldn’t care too much about AC use. The car is capable of great range without worrying about this.
But is a Tesla any worse than a petrol car?
I dont think that is the bar that we are using.
What happens if you place the AC into recirculate?
I wouldn’t care too much about AC use. The car is capable of great range without worrying about this.
Assuming aircon uses the same amount of power consistently when the car is in motion and not sealed up in a garage (airflow)However for those scenarios where I need all the range the car can muster it's good to know I can get an extra ~10% (40-50km) by leaving the aircon off
I have been observing similar power drain when leaving the car parked at work. The staff parking area has no shade so parking in the sun with leaving the cabin overheat protection on and allowing it to use AC appears to let the cabin temperature go up to 38C and then kicks in the AC and appears to draw ~2% per hour.Let the A/C run for 2 hours, and observed the expected ~2%/hour drop that would be consistent with a ~1.5kW constant load. Had 84% at 11am, and 82% at noon.
I'll try that tomorrow. Today I let it run for a couple of hours with the wall charger disconnected. Everything else the same as the previous test (I'm not in the car, car is sitting parked/locked in the garage, 27C ambient temp, 22C aircon temp, auto mode).
The car started on 86% charge at 10am sharp. Cooled the interior to 22C in 4 minutes, the same as when plugged in.
Let the A/C run for 2 hours, and observed the expected ~2%/hour drop that would be consistent with a ~1.5kW constant load. Had 84% at 11am, and 82% at noon.
Now I can go to lunch in my nicely prechilled car.
I generally agree. However for those scenarios where I need all the range the car can muster it's good to know I can get an extra ~10% (40-50km) by leaving the aircon off (if/when this is actually tolerable).
Yeah, my aircon is set to 23.5 max (tested in 40c on Saturday, worked a treat) and 20.5 min (heating on a cold evening). All set up in Tasker so does it automagically when phone connects over Bluetooth.Turn the aircon up to 24.
Turn the aircon up to 24
I'll try that tomorrow. Today I let it run for a couple of hours with the wall charger disconnected. Everything else the same as the previous test (I'm not in the car, car is sitting parked/locked in the garage, 27C ambient temp, 22C aircon temp, auto mode).
The car started on 86% charge at 10am sharp. Cooled the interior to 22C in 4 minutes, the same as when plugged in.
Let the A/C run for 2 hours, and observed the expected ~2%/hour drop that would be consistent with a ~1.5kW constant load. Had 84% at 11am, and 82% at noon.
Now I can go to lunch in my nicely prechilled car.
I generally agree. However for those scenarios where I need all the range the car can muster it's good to know I can get an extra ~10% (40-50km) by leaving the aircon off (if/when this is actually tolerable).
I put some strongly infrared rejecting tinting on the sides and back window of mine and it did seem to make a fair difference to the rate at which the car heats up in the sunauto mode on 24C is just not tolerable. Manual mode is completely useless. Putting the AC on 25 degrees and fan on i.e. 8 or 9 gives you insanely nice cool breeze but actually consumes more power than 19 degrees in automatic mode! I suspect fan speed has by far the biggest effect on consumption as you not only increase the fans Whr consumption but also the ACs work as it has to work faster.
21.5C imho is completely fine for driving through the outback at midday without any tint or shade. 22 is tolerable.. Once dawn is coming 23 or no aircon is actually ok even when it's still above 30 outside. I think what's happening is that without sunlight a well cooled car can just be recirculating air for hours whereas if the sun is shining there is a lot of light energy entering the cabin. Certainly the glassroof feels so hot that you can burn your hand. Don't think tinting the side windows will make any difference, the sun is all hitting the top of the car.
probs best to switch the car to km as 1 km = 150watthours.
I will try a test in the cairns midday heat maybe on sunday and see how much the car consumes.
I put some strongly infrared rejecting tinting on the sides and back window of mine and it did seem to make a fair difference to the rate at which the car heats up in the sun
Fair point. I’m not sure about the physics and heat flows with the tint vs without. We’ll see how I get on.I wonder the impact and how much heat stress that could put on the glass.
I had a crack that appeared shortly after I used the demistifier (though it may not be related). When I see how much back and forth was needed to get Tesla to replace it under warranty, I don't want to think what would have happened if that glass had been tinted.
The cost to replace the rear glass is $1,126.51 FWIW
Looking at the TeslaFi numbers, it looks like most of the fleet is getting 2019.36.2.1 ea322ad. I wonder why yours is not getting that one? What model, FSD options your car has?Car just started downloading 32.12.4....not sure what it fixes as release notes are same as V10