Will the Bay Area's embryonic electric car industry get aced out by Detroit in the accelerating quest for federal funds? San Carlos' Tesla Motors is asking for a whopping $400 million to get its electric roadster further off the ground and to develop a less-expensive sedan. San Francisco's XP Vehicles is in line to get $40 million to help build a cutting-edge consumer car and an off-road utility vehicle. But Scott Redmond, chairman and technology architect of XP Vehicles, says, "Detroit is trying to hijack the entire alternative energy fund."
He's referring to the Department of Energy's $25 billion Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program, which XP, Tesla and other alternative-energy car companies have applied for. In their desperate attempt to secure a bailout, Detroit's Big Three have reportedly lobbied to grab that money, for the sake of developing their own alternative-energy vehicles. Tesla and others are vigorously pushing back. Southern California's Fisker Automotive Inc., which makes plug-in hybrids, also wants a piece of the federal action. "It's a battle zone," says Redmond.
One possible setback, at least for Tesla, came last weekend with a stinging, widely circulated New York Times critique that slammed Tesla's technology as "woefully immature." The Times also wondered, perhaps more tellingly, why taxpayers should help fund Tesla's "don't-even-ask-expensive" roadster, which sells for $109,000. The car XP Vehicles is developing, which will cost consumers between $13,000 and $15,000, may be in a sweeter political spot, but Redmond fears that if Tesla loses out, so could others in the industry.