Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla Motors and Government Money

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
It's looking like they are seriously considering/have already decided to approve some type of a "bailout" for the American automakers as they (the House of Representatives) are discussing the implementation of some type of "oversight" board/committee.

More to come...
 
This article from the Detroit News is so derisive of Tesla it is almost comical:

Commentary: California wants to raid Big 3 bailout cash for green cars | The Detroit News | detnews.com

In fact, Tesla Motors, a struggling San Jose start-up manufacturer of electric cars in Feinstein's back yard, has already applied for $400 million in EISA loans to build a new plant for making a luxury $60,000, battery-powered family sedan.

So while some members of Congress tut-tut Detroit executives for wasting money on private jets, Washington is entertaining taxpayer-financed loans for an automaker that caters to Silicon Valley millionaires.
 
This article from the Detroit News is so derisive of Tesla it is almost comical:

Commentary: California wants to raid Big 3 bailout cash for green cars | The Detroit News | detnews.com

Eww.... Yeah, I guess that Tesla is going to get beat with that particular stick for some time to come, huh? But I guess we can clearly see on just which side of the issue this particular representative of the media is, huh?

As always, the most disturbing aspect of all of these perspectives on that side of the issue is their continued reference of adherence to increased "fuel efficiency" more so than the much needed complete divergence from the World's oil addiction into that of new technologies.

Even now, all but Chrysler merely refer in passing (almost as a hindsight when questioned "what about?") to developing/implementing new sources of powering our vehicles while they've (Chrysler) placed it squarely at the forefront of their reorientation plans with the ENVI program https://www.chryslerllc.com/en/innovation/envi/overview/, which has three solely electric powered vehicles).

Uh oh, their back to talking "merger" again.
 
Last edited:
How Risky Is Tesla’s Bet on a DOE Loan Guarantee? Earth2Tech

More details on the DOE loans. Looks like Tesla needs the new $400 million loan if they want to have a good chance of progressing in Model S on time. The $200 million DOE loan guarantee might come too slow and Tesla isn't the first in line to get a guarantee.

Solar firm Solyndra looks to outshine competition - San Francisco Business Times
Solyndra is one of 16 companies that qualified for $2 billion in Department of Energy loan guarantees as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The loans can finance up to 80 percent of the cost of a project. Solyndra is the only photovoltaic solar maker in line for the money of 156 applicants in several industry categories. San Carlos-based electric carmaker Tesla Motors and solar thermal power plant company BrightSource Energy, based in Oakland, are also on the DOE’s list.
 
DOE Doles Out Cash for Alternative Vehicle Tech Earth2Tech

Plug-in hybrid vehicles depend on industry rescue | Freep.com | Detroit Free Press

Makers of electric cars want federal money, too - SFGate
Will the Bay Area's embryonic electric car industry get aced out by Detroit in the accelerating quest for federal funds? San Carlos' Tesla Motors is asking for a whopping $400 million to get its electric roadster further off the ground and to develop a less-expensive sedan. San Francisco's XP Vehicles is in line to get $40 million to help build a cutting-edge consumer car and an off-road utility vehicle. But Scott Redmond, chairman and technology architect of XP Vehicles, says, "Detroit is trying to hijack the entire alternative energy fund."

He's referring to the Department of Energy's $25 billion Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program, which XP, Tesla and other alternative-energy car companies have applied for. In their desperate attempt to secure a bailout, Detroit's Big Three have reportedly lobbied to grab that money, for the sake of developing their own alternative-energy vehicles. Tesla and others are vigorously pushing back. Southern California's Fisker Automotive Inc., which makes plug-in hybrids, also wants a piece of the federal action. "It's a battle zone," says Redmond.

One possible setback, at least for Tesla, came last weekend with a stinging, widely circulated New York Times critique that slammed Tesla's technology as "woefully immature." The Times also wondered, perhaps more tellingly, why taxpayers should help fund Tesla's "don't-even-ask-expensive" roadster, which sells for $109,000. The car XP Vehicles is developing, which will cost consumers between $13,000 and $15,000, may be in a sweeter political spot, but Redmond fears that if Tesla loses out, so could others in the industry.
 
Last edited:
Letter from SF and SJ mayors

Mayors Reed, Newsom oppose $25B automakers' bailout - Silicon Valley / San Jose Business Journal:
San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed and San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom put out a letter Friday asking Congressional leaders not to reallocate $25 billion intended for the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Incentive Program to bailout Detroit’s Big Three.
...

The letter said companies like San Jose-based Tesla Motors Inc. are leading the way toward a green economy and have the potential to create tens of thousands of jobs nationwide and revolutionize the auto industry.

The letter states that repurposing the funds “could force Tesla Motors to defer their announced plans for a new 700,000-square-foot manufacturing complex in Silicon Valley, costing 1,000 projected jobs, including more than 500 manufacturing jobs, setting back the company and undermining immediate and long-term economic benefits.”
The letter is reprinted in this article: San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed and San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom Urge Congress Not to Let Auto Industry Bailout Stop Funding for Transportation Innovation - MarketWatch
 
BREAKING: Automakers to get $15 billion in federal loans

BREAKING: Automakers to get $15 billion in federal loans - Autoblog

"Nancy Pelosi gave in to the White House and its position that the money should come from $25 billion in loans previously approved to help the automakers retool for energy fuel efficient vehicles, rather than drawing the aid from the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Fund for struggling financial institutions. In return, Pelosi is seeking a guarantee that the money would be replenished in "a matter of weeks.""

Sigh, I kind of expected this, seems like they were totally about to give in and this won't be the first time Pelosi gave in. Hopefully when Obama gets to office these funds will quickly be replenished.
 
Yes, I hope they get it too... but if I understand it correctly, this $400 million useful to expedite their programs, but not required for them to stay in business. That is what the $200 million loan they hope to receive in the Spring is for. The theory is, that $200 million will allow them to reach profitability with the Roadster, and create manufacturing for the Model S. I think the additional $400 million will only speed up the process if they get it (and perhaps start on new projects).
 
Argh! Now the Wall Street Journal is parroting the "Tesla wants a bailout for their car only the rich can afford" line.

Electric-Car Makers Struggle - WSJ.com

Tesla Motors LLC, once the darling of the green car movement, is now scrambling to stay afloat and is asking for a $400 million loan from the same $25 billion federal Energy Department program that Detroit's car makers are looking to tap in their own fight for survival.

Tesla is now taking some flak for seeking handouts from taxpayers, most of whom could never afford its current product, a racy electric sports car that starts at more than $100,000. Detroit's chiefs might say: Welcome to our world.

Can no journalist in this country understand that the 2007 CAFE bill set aside the $25 billion in loans just for getting new technology like Tesla uses to market? Their application for the loan is not looking for a "bailout" even if other manufacturers are using it for such? The Roadster development is paid for so this money is not to support selling a super-expensive sports car?

The reporting is so bad and unchecked in these big periodicals: Newsweek, New York Times, Wall Street Journal - that it almost makes me believe in conspiracy theories as to someone with an agenda behind the story perpetuating the lies.
 
I'd like to think it's a conspiracy but at least with my Norwegian journalists it's simply a matter of laziness. That coupled with here in Norway a lack of skill with anything related to science or numbers. Their knowledge seems to inversely related to the size of the number :)

Cobos