Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register
  • We just completed a significant update, but we still have some fixes and adjustments to make. Please see this thread for more details and to find out how to revert to the old design. Cheers!

Tesla - please design out the Cruise control stalk

thegruf

Active Member
Mar 24, 2015
2,291
2,073
indeterminate
With AP/TACC I find myself messing with control more than using the steering wheel!

It's a horrible HID. Push / Pull / Up / Down / what's the stupid button on the end do ... yada yada

Great opportunity for Tesla to reimagine a new control for this.... before Apple do!

Maybe use the physical control to switch it on/off and then have the 17 inch display force a setting display in the lower half (quarter?) of the screen for options.
I could also envisage a nice touch display on the centre of the steering wheel
 
Upvote 0

SeminoleFSU

Voluntaryist
Apr 5, 2013
1,491
446
Atlanta, GA
With AP/TACC I find myself messing with control more than using the steering wheel!

It's a horrible HID. Push / Pull / Up / Down / what's the stupid button on the end do ... yada yada

Great opportunity for Tesla to reimagine a new control for this.... before Apple do!

Maybe use the physical control to switch it on/off and then have the 17 inch display force a setting display in the lower half (quarter?) of the screen for options.
I could also envisage a nice touch display on the centre of the steering wheel
I have the old "classic" stalk and I'd just be happy if the reversed the action when pushing foward or pulling back... to me it seems reversed.
 

CHG-ON

Still in love after all these miles
Jun 24, 2014
3,079
648
Santa Cruz Mountains, USA
I actually don't mind it at all. Pull to turn on (once or twice). Push hard up or down to change speed by 5mph. Push to disengage. It's become completely automatic for me and did within a couple of days. I'm not sure I understand the issue. Can you elaborate?

I also am not for putting the controls on the 17". Too distracting for me, as I have to take my eyes off the road. I wear bifocals, which means I must turn my head. That's a safety issue.
 

BertL

Active Member
Aug 19, 2015
2,018
1,580
Carlsbad, CA
I am very much OK with the current implementation. I want a separate stalk or physical control over major items like TACC, that I can learn to operate by feel without looking, and won't change dramatically as it will with UI changes on a touch screen.
 

mikeash

Active Member
Oct 26, 2014
1,105
709
Fairfax, VA, USA
I agree that the current stalk isn't an issue. It's really not very complicated. If AP is off, pull to engage at the existing set point (or, with 7.1, the current speed limit plus fudge factor), push down to engage at the current speed. Pull twice to engage autosteer. When AP is on, push up to increase speed, down to increase speed. Pull and hold to set speed to current speed limit plus fudge factor. Push to disengage. Ignore button. Not so hard!
 

CHG-ON

Still in love after all these miles
Jun 24, 2014
3,079
648
Santa Cruz Mountains, USA
I just updated to 7.1 this evening and I see that the functionality for the stalk has changed. So I withdraw my last comment (which I think has been on too long to edit) and now need to see how it works. From what I read in the download notes, I am not sure that I like it. Judgement withheld until I have some good time behind the wheel (and the stalk).
 

AWDtsla

Active Member
Mar 3, 2013
4,282
4,252
NE
With AP/TACC I find myself messing with control more than using the steering wheel!

It's a horrible HID. Push / Pull / Up / Down / what's the stupid button on the end do ... yada yada

+1 It is unnecessarily complicated and totally inelegant design. Two ways to cancel? Why? Previously 3 now 4 ways to resume? Really? One button should toggle cancel and resume.

Others have detailed the failings of design better than I.

edit - if the design was proper you wouldn't want a touchscreen replacement. That's a throw the baby out with the bathwater solution to this mess.
 

N4HHE

Member
Oct 15, 2013
733
78
Madison, AL
I like it just the way it is.

But I would complain that +- trim adjustments are not as smooth as they should be. Whoever wrote that section of software doesn't know control theory, they seem to dump a +-1 or +-5 MPH error on the cruise control and let it make the corrections. Acceleration/deceleration should not be as abrupt. The energy gauge should not show an overshoot bounce. Even my Subaru gets this detail right.
 

thegruf

Active Member
Mar 24, 2015
2,291
2,073
indeterminate
The cruise stalk is the Microsoft Windows Mobile of controls.
It works, some ppl like it, but is is archaic.

Apple (I'm not an Apple user) will obliterate it with a dramatically better UI that will have everyone else scrambling to keep up.

Tesla need to get there first on the Model 3.
 

Products we're discussing on TMC...

About Us

Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.

Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


SUPPORT TMC
Top