You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The second post is certainly FUD but are you saying the claim that 8 tows out of 36 semis is untrue?
Not that concerning, really. First, we have no idea if that number is accurate. And even if it is, the Pepsi/Lays trucks are essentially a pilot program. There will be some bugs to work out. I'll be concerned when Pepsi/Lays expresses concern over the performance of the trucks.Concerning
"Concerning" was an Elon reference, he often replies to ridiculous conspiracies on Twitter with "Concerning". Too subtle I guess. However if there are 8 tows out of 36 vehicles that is a bit concerning and certainly not a good look for Tesla and the Semi program.Not that concerning, really. First, we have no idea if that number is accurate. And even if it is, the Pepsi/Lays trucks are essentially a pilot program. There will be some bugs to work out. I'll be concerned when Pepsi/Lays expresses concern over the performance of the trucks.
Yes, I got that. I'm not impressed by his Tweets of late either. But that's no reason to spread FUD that likely isn't even factual."Concerning" was an Elon reference, he often replies to ridiculous conspiracies on Twitter with "Concerning". Too subtle I guess. However if there are 8 tows out of 36 vehicles that is a bit concerning and certainly not a good look for Tesla and the Semi program.
The reasons matter. Could the land have been utilized for PV ? If not, is that typical ?
When I look at the photo, I see the spacing between the rows as being about the same height* as a row. This matches up with my trig calc and calculators available on the web for a design in which the panels are angled 20 degrees and shading is avoided when the sun reaches 20 degrees.
If the panels are angled at 30 degrees then row spacing increases to 1.5x the row height.
So I'm tempted to say that 033 - 0.5 of land area can be used for rows, but this does not include land used for motorized access.
*By height I mean the distance on the map, not the elevation above ground
Thanks both. Utility solar has not really been my thing over the years, just dabbled.I followed the mowed contour and dropped the interior unused space, otherwise it's 50000 meters square. The site was a former apple orchard. There are other arrays in the area now.
View attachment 916716
This article references a 3.6MW slightly sloped site from 2014.North Brookfield - TransAlta
I think the 250000 square meter, 62 acre figure is for all 5 installations.
View attachment 916721
10.4 MW 2021, 400,000 square meters, 100 acres (over selected). Which aligns with 5-10 aces per MW reported here: Land Use & Solar Development | SEIA
View attachment 916726View attachment 916727
We are counting on much lower numbers but have set aside 10 acres for panels. Only counting on 1mw but we’ll see what costs/production is once we get bids late fall winter.
Thanks both. Utility solar has not really been my thing over the years, just dabbled.
The real question is not "how small a perimeter can I draw around a group of panels". Instead it is "for a random patch of land that I own, how many panels & associated stuff can I fit in".
When doing that calc - in general - that includes the unused bit in the middle or anywhere else that is too rough; includes the perimeter fence, and the outside-the-fence mown security strip; includes setback from the fringing trees; and the fringing trees that have to be maintained for visual amenity reasons; includes the inverter shacks; includes the access and maintenance roads; the electrical feeds in/out and the sterile zones under them; etc.
I'm not really too fussed what the actual number is, but we ought not to kid ourselves about the number by cherry picking only the good bits. Of course that number will also depend on latitude, and land slope and orientation. It might be as low as 100kW/acre or as high as 200kW/acre. But it would seem to be there or thereabouts.
===
Similarly in the 300 kWh/day number I did per truck that was my guesstimate of an average truck (so not fully weighted up) on an average round (so not a 500-miler) on an average day (so not raining/snow/mud) on flattish ground on good condition roads. So maybe if everything is maxed out then it might be 100kWh/day or even more if they have two drivers etc.
===
So we might reasonably get anywhere from as low as 1 acre of solar per truck to as much as (say) 3 or more acres of solar per truck. But it'll be somewhere in that territory.
=================
Gosh, are all those breakdowns real, or is this FUD being sprayed ?
I’m having difficulty following your numbers.
One truck needs 300kWh a day.
One acre of solar panels generates 1MWh a day (assuming 150kW*6 hours/day).
So one acre can cover 3 trucks.
Regardless, a fleet of 50 trucks would need 20 acres which is the entire area of my company’s terminal.
It might be as low as 100kW/acre or as high as 200kW/acre. But it would seem to be there or thereabouts.
50 acre available for this but we only think we need 10, 2 acres of roof as wellDoes your company have dedicated land for solar panels? Is it adjacent to your main facility?
So, soon, right?I am glad that Pepsi is working this out for me. Then another 2k beta testers before the factory goes live.
8 tows out of ??? tractorMiles or tractorHours is not concerning, especially if they were the first 8 each towed once each due to the bus bar (or any other singular) issue.The second post is certainly FUD but are you saying the claim that 8 tows out of 36 semis is untrue?
Thank you.I found some confirmation that you are right (noted below.) I'm not sure *why* you are correct, but that is my problem.
Details the 5 largest PV farms in the world. I looked for them because I figured they would maximize land use, and could be considered best case examples. The two farms with both STC and area values are a bit over 6 acres per MW.Profiling the top five largest solar power plants in the world
Solar power is enhancing its reputation as one of the fastest-growing renewable sources, with a number of the largest plants coming online in recent yearswww.nsenergybusiness.com
One *possible* confounder here would be the panel angle. The photo looks pretty steep but I'm really not sure.
I used to have an old Solar City slide deck that claimed a bit over 1300 kWh annual production per installed kW. That's 15% capacity factor. The EIA says total US PV generation was 201 TWh in 2022. SIEA says the US installed PV grew from 122 to 142 GW during 2022. Using 132 GW as the average installed capacity I get 1520 hours of rated production or 17.4% capacity factor. Since that includes the lower-yielding residential installations, it follows that large installations average better than 17.4%.My 14% global average capacity factor is taken from IEA data. I'm not a great beleiver in IEA data (I calculate it myself each year from th IEA data re TWh output / GW input), but this number is plausible and is better than my lower bound of 10%.
I guess you're being more charitable than I am. If 1/4 of the fleet needs a tow in the first 3 months of deployment that seems problematic to me, assuming the figures are correct. The latest seems to be a recent event so I'd think the bus bar issue would have already been fixed.8 tows out of ??? tractorMiles or tractorHours is not concerning, especially if they were the first 8 each towed once each due to the bus bar (or any other singular) issue.
Repeat failures are worse
Failures on later builds are worse
Different failure modes are worse
No useful data given.