Canuck
Well-Known Member
A car branded a lemon is a lemon... the future owner should be made aware.
Where's the brand? I don't think the iron even got hot because he never even commenced a lemon law action. If I have the facts correctly, after he threatened one Tesla did a good will gesture buy back. So it's not branded a lemon. Otherwise, anyone who threatens lemon law litigation would put the manufacturer in the position of not being inclined to do a good will gesture buy back because they are doing this to save on litigation costs. Even if they win that litigation, and it's not branded a lemon, they lose a lot more in unrecoverable legal fees -- plus they get a ton of bad press. This buy back is just a small cost of doing business since they can fix and resell it. If you think they are now required, even morally or ethically, to label it a "lemon" as a CPO we will agree to disagree on that one. Or maybe you just expect them to tell all the problems the prior owner told them and that they fixed? That's called asking for the repair logs and if Tesla declines then it's caveat emptor.
Also, I don't see the issues as things that just can't be fixed --- that's why vehicles come in parts. There's also a lot of us out there who don't sweat what we consider the smaller stuff but that's not to say that others should not. I'm just saying it can be fixed, sold with full warranty, and someone could be really happy with it whereas someone else will fester for days over misaligned chrome that someone else doesn't even notice let alone sweat about it if they do notice.