dhanson865
Well-Known Member
I agree it makes the network more versatile, but not sure I draw the same conclusion that that is the best approach.
Superchargers can be fairly widely spaced, I don't need one on each street corner like a gas station.
But when I get to one I'd like there to be a good chance that there is a stall free. I think that's much more likely with fewer, bigger, sites.
I could have some fancy software on my dash to locate a non-busy location, but unless I can book a slot in advance that isn't much use at small sites - several cars might turn up just before I get there ... plus I may be delayed / change my mind / whatever and then be hogging a pre-booked slot that I then don't actually use / don't use on time. Lots of hassle in trying to manage a pre-booked system too without attendants.
Hence I favour larger sites.
Larger sites, given that I will be stopping for 30 minutes or so, can also attract some amenities to help me pass the time.
Larger sites are more vulnerable to grid issues (blackout, brownout, noisy power). If you have two smaller locations one city apart with two different electric utilities supporting you might find that Site A stays up when Site B goes down or vice versa.
Knoxville Supercharger Not Working
I'm happy to have a 8 stall location relatively close to home, but I'd rather have the next 8 stalls be on the north or east side of town helping for other routes and being on different electric utilities than to double up on the west side and have 16 in one spot and still be on the same KUB grid.
Two seperate locations, one goes down, you drive to the next closest
One big location goes down, you have to charge on L2 or if you are lucky Chademo.
But once you get enough locations I'm fine with some locations being larger than others as needed for density to prevent long lines.