You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems like all of them right now, from user reports.Anyone has the list of SuperCharger sites that are now limited to 80% SOC?
Sounds like something useful for supercharge.info as well...
Seems like all of them right now, from user reports.
Those 3 without the warning were all very newly opened (SJ- BH within 2 weeks, and the other two within 4 days). Of them, only Blossom Hill has even made it onto Tesla's online map as open yet. And that may have just happened within the last few days. Not really a great subset to determine whether essentially all of the established locations that people are used to using have the warnings or not. Though, of course, it is sufficient to refute the statement on technical grounds (i.e. rigidly defined "all").No, 3 of the 4 I charged yesterday at did not have this limitation (San Francisco Letterman Drive, San Jose Blossom Hill Road, and Big Sur). Monterey did, however (don’t know the historical usage pattern here, but It was pretty busy while I was there).
I would expect (no insider knowledge) Tesla to be tuning / fixing this feature going forward, as they get experience with it, and customers provide feedback.
Those 3 without the warning were all very newly opened (SJ- BH within 2 weeks, and the other two within 4 days). Of them, only Blossom Hill has even made it onto Tesla's online map as open yet. And that may have just happened within the last few days. Not really a great subset to determine whether essentially all of the established locations that people are used to using have the warnings or not. Though, of course, it is sufficient to refute the statement on technical grounds (i.e. rigidly defined "all").
Oh, jeez. Seriously? How about because there are still gaps larger than the total range of the cars that still don't have any Supercharger coverage? Any kind--even v2--would be like an oasis in the desert!I understand tesla time, but if v3 is the future, why delay the buildout? Why spend money on v2 locations.
Yeah and my car got the 150kW update last week. I just charged 142kW on a V2 charger. Very nice. I don't feel a great "gotta have it now" need for the V3.Oh, jeez. Seriously? How about because there are still gaps larger than the total range of the cars that still don't have any Supercharger coverage? Any kind--even v2--would be like an oasis in the desert!
And wouldn’t it be better to fill those gaps with a V3 supercharger?Oh, jeez. Seriously? How about because there are still gaps larger than the total range of the cars that still don't have any Supercharger coverage? Any kind--even v2--would be like an oasis in the desert!
You don’t feel the need until you have to wait for a stall, a v3 SC can charge model 3s quicker which means a higher throughputYeah and my car got the 150kW update last week. I just charged 142kW on a V2 charger. Very nice. I don't feel a great "gotta have it now" need for the V3.
Basically too old, yes, but mainly the smaller batteries like that can't take rates that high. Mine is a 2014 S 85, so it also can't take power that high. I did see a little bit higher rates than I had ever seen before on a trip last week. I saw about 117 or 118kW a couple of times, where for several years I don't think I'd seen over 114kW. But I think it is only the Model 3 and maybe the newer S and X with the 100 packs that can really get up near 150kW.My 2012 S got the 150kw update last weekend, but my max charge rate only reached ~118kw. Maybe my car is too old for 150kw?
(I arrived to the Centralia supercharger with a SoC of 5%, and had Seattle as my final destination. So it should have used all 150kw if the car is allowed to.)
No.And wouldn’t it be better to fill those gaps with a V3 supercharger?
So to explain the "No" answer: Limited quantities of each type still being built right now, and these remaining minor kinds of gap places like Burns, Oregon or Grangeville, Idaho that are not on Interstates have no need for the ultra fast speed of v3 Superchargers, so let Tesla send the v3 ones to the places that really need that speed and throughput, like these places you are talking about that may have a wait for a stall. I guarantee you there will not be a wait for a stall in Burns or Grangeville, since it would be more like one car per day or two. They just need something that is better than waiting 7 hours on AC charging.You don’t feel the need until you have to wait for a stall, a v3 SC can charge model 3s quicker which means a higher throughput
If the v3 SC technology is here and ready to be deployed then it makes no sense to keep building v2 superchargers
My 2012 S got the 150kw update last weekend, but my max charge rate only reached ~118kw. Maybe my car is too old for 150kw?
(I arrived to the Centralia supercharger with a SoC of 5%, and had Seattle as my final destination. So it should have used all 150kw if the car is allowed to.)
Oh, jeez. Seriously? How about because there are still gaps larger than the total range of the cars that still don't have any Supercharger coverage? Any kind--even v2--would be like an oasis in the desert!
Location | Site Known? | Status |
Anaheim, CA | yes | in permitting |
Anaheim Hills, CA | yes | operational |
Big Sur, CA | yes | operational |
Chico, CA | yes | awaiting power on / testing |
Dublin - Dublin Blvd, CA | yes | under construction |
Emeryville, CA | yes | in permitting |
Fairfield - Holiday Lane, CA | yes | operational |
Hayward, CA | yes | awaiting power on / testing |
Huntington Beach, CA | yes | in permitting |
Laytonville, CA | yes | under construction |
Marin City, CA | yes | in permitting |
Menlo Park, CA | yes | under construction |
Milpitas - Great Mall, CA | yes | under construction |
Newark, CA | yes | awaiting transformer / hookup |
Ojai, CA | yes | under construction |
Palm Springs, CA | yes | under construction |
Pasadena, CA | yes | in permitting |
Rancho Mirage, CA | yes | in permitting |
Richmond, CA | yes | under construction |
Rohnert Park, CA | yes | operational |
San Diego - Del Mar Heights Road, CA | yes | operational |
San Francisco - Letterman Drive, CA | yes | operational |
San Jose - Blossom Hill Road, CA | yes | operational |
San Jose - Cottle Road, CA | yes | in permitting |
Santa Monica, CA | yes | in permitting |
South San Francisco, CA | yes | in permitting |
Tahoe City, CA | yes | in permitting |
Vallejo, CA | yes | under construction |
Visalia, CA | maybe | in planning |
Watsonville, CA | yes | awaiting transformer / hookup |
Windsor, CA | yes | permit approved |
Wheat Ridge, CO | maybe | in site selection |
Hartford - Liebert Road, CT | yes | under construction |
Lisbon, CT | yes | in permitting |
Meriden, CT | maybe | in site selection |
Old Lyme, CT | yes | in permitting |
Stamford - High Ridge Road, CT | yes | under construction |
Stamford - Summer Street, CT | yes | under construction |
Celebration, FL | yes | operational |
Kissimmee, FL | yes | in permitting |
Miami - Mary Brickell Village, FL | yes | operational |
Miami - Wynwood, FL | maybe | in site selection |
Sioux City, IA | maybe | in design / permitting? |
Rolling Meadows, IL | yes | expansion in permitting |
Zionsville, IN | yes | operational |
Mission, KS | yes | operational |
Olathe, KS | yes | under construction |
Lafayette, LA | yes | in permitting |
Beverly, MA | yes | permit issued |
Boston - Richard B Ross Way, MA | yes | operational |
Braintree, MA | yes | in permitting |
Lynnfield, MA | yes | under construction |
Orleans, MA | yes | in permitting |
Seekonk, MA | yes | in permitting |
Wareham, MA | yes | in permitting |
Woburn, MA | yes | in permitting |
Beltsville, MD | yes | in permitting |
Bethesda - Montgomery Mall East, MD | yes | in permitting |
Bethesda - Montgomery Mall West, MD | yes | in permitting |
Frederick, MD | yes | in permitting |
Riverdale Park, MD | yes | under construction |
Baileyville, ME | yes | in permitting |
Bethel, ME | yes | in permitting |
Medway, ME | yes | under construction |
Portland, ME | yes | under construction |
Clare, MI | yes | operational |
Escanaba, MI | yes | in permitting |
Hudsonville, MI | yes | in permitting |
Sault Sainte Marie, MI | yes | in permitting |
Swartz Creek, MI | yes | awaiting power on / testing |
Albert Lea II, MN | yes | in permitting |
Alexandria, MN | yes | in permitting |
Robbinsdale, MN | yes | under construction |
St Charles - Streets of St Charles, MO | yes | operational |
Bismarck, ND | yes | in permitting |
Dickinson, ND | yes | in permitting |
Fargo, ND | maybe | in permitting |
Jamestown, ND | maybe | in site selection |
Pembina, ND | yes | in permitting |
Rochester, NH | yes | in permitting |
Barnegat Township, NJ | yes | operational |
Basking Ridge, NJ | yes | under construction |
Boonton, NJ | yes | under construction |
Cape May, NJ | yes | under construction |
Deptford, NJ | yes | in permitting |
East Brunswick II, NJ | yes | awaiting power on / testing |
Phillipsburg, NJ | yes | in permitting |
Robbinsville, NJ | yes | awaiting power on / testing |
Toms River, NJ | yes | under construction |
Wall Township, NJ | yes | in permitting |
Incline Village, NV | yes | under construction hiatus |
Las Vegas - Alta Drive, NV | yes | operational |
Las Vegas - Tivoli Village, NV | yes | operational |
Middletown, NY | yes | under construction |
Oneonta, NY | yes | in permitting |
Ossining, NY | yes | awaiting power on / testing |
West Nyack, NY | yes | awaiting power on / testing |
Yorktown Heights, NY | yes | awaiting power on / testing |
Columbus - Polaris Parkway, OH | yes | awaiting power on / testing |
Philadelphia - East Market, PA | yes | operational |
Wall, SD | yes | under construction |
Nashville - Downtown, TN | yes | permit issued |
Austin - Stonelake Blvd, TX | yes | under construction |
Burleson, TX | yes | under construction |
Fort Worth - Monahans Avenue, TX | yes | in permitting |
Giddings, TX | yes | in permitting |
Henrietta, TX | yes | under construction |
Houston - Downtown, TX | maybe | in site selection / design |
San Antonio, TX | yes | in permitting |
Webster, TX | yes | under construction |
Leesburg, VA | yes | awaiting transformer / hookup |
Salem, VA | yes | under construction |
Tysons, VA | yes | in permitting |
Auburn, WA | yes | under construction |
Blaine, WA | yes | under construction |
Bellevue, WA | yes | in permitting? |
Seattle, WA | yes | under construction |
Tumwater, WA | yes | in permitting |
Casper, WY | maybe | in site selection |
Medicine Hat, AB | yes | permit issued? |
Salmon Arm, BC | maybe | in design/permitting |
Vancouver - Howe Street, BC | yes | operational |
Brandon, MB | yes | in design/permitting |
Portage la Prairie, MB | yes | in design/permitting |
Prawda, MB | yes | in permitting |
Winnipeg, MB | yes | in permitting |
Quispamsis, NB | yes | under construction |
Salisbury, NB | yes | under construction |
Woodstock, NB | yes | under construction |
Enfield, NS | maybe | awaiting construction |
Blind River, ON | maybe | in permitting? |
Brockville, ON | yes | in design/permitting |
Ignace, ON | yes | in permitting |
Kincardine, ON | maybe | in permitting? |
Nipigon, ON | yes | in permitting |
North Bay, ON | yes | under construction |
North York, ON | yes | operational |
Renfrew, ON | yes | in permitting |
Terrace Bay, ON | yes | in permitting |
Vaughan, ON | yes | in permitting |
Woodbridge, ON | maybe | in design/permitting |
Moosomin, SK | yes | in permitting |
Regina, SK | maybe | in design/permitting |
Did anybody else notice California supercharging rate is now $0.26/kWh all across the board
Does anyone know if Tesla discloses how much superchargers cost them to run annually? I’ve always been both impressed and surprised that Tesla continues to aggressively build out Supercharger sites when each one costs them potentially 6 figures in capital expenses, followed by potentially tens of thousands annually in maintenance and electricity. (The amount they charge customers for electricity surely doesn’t even cover their own electric bill, leave alone other maintenance and potential rent costs). They do have the option of doing (in the US) what they did in Europe and allowing their vehicles to be compatible with both the Tesla Superchargers as well as third party CCS chargers to not only lighten the load on superchargers, but also increase the locations where it is possible to charge the car with CCS. I’m happy for every new supercharger site that opens (I have free supercharging) but always wonder how sustainable continued aggressive expansion and operation of superchargers is to their bottom line. If there are any hard numbers on costs published I would love to see them.
Given that there are locations where they're unable to cope with the capacity needs as it is, they should really start upgrading all of the high-usage V2 locations to V3, and then repurpose the equipment that they remove, so that the cost of adding superchargers in likely low-volume-but-interesting locations is basically just the cost of labor. I'm sure there have to be places where they think, "We'd like to have a supercharger here, but we can't justify the cost."