Doug Martoccia
Member
The most cost effective sweet spot from an absolute point of view would be the 40 with no options. However, cost effectiveness is not always the most important consideration. For my personal needs, my configuration provides my wife and I with sufficient flexibility to make medium and long range trips conveniently - something that is not possible without the SC option. For cost effectiveness, I could have dropped the air suspension and the multi-coat red and saved considerable coinage. Items such as premium sound, pano roof, rear facing child seats, dual chargers and the tech package are clearly optional to the value-sensitive buyer.