Timber! tsla below $310. doesnt look good for next week with MLK holiday.
When a stock loses ~37 points, "downgrades are coming!" (GOT saying)
Daily stock movements and downgrades/upgrades are unrelated.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Timber! tsla below $310. doesnt look good for next week with MLK holiday.
When a stock loses ~37 points, "downgrades are coming!" (GOT saying)
PURPA in the US establishes that a non-utility can be an independent power producer (IPP) and participate in wholesale power markets. Independent Power Producer - WikipediaGood information and interpretation in this post, but unless there is something that I’m completely misunderstanding, the fatal problem of your concluding paragraph is that, within most states in the US, Tesla very likely would be prohibited from so acting unless they restructured themselves as a utility...with all the very unfortunate baggage that entails.
I haven’t a clue as to whether your proposal could occur in non-US markets.
Without speculating on whether that is Elon or not I liked that came out today when everyone is obsessing over the words in his email.A dictionary, but a version where everyone agrees the words mean the same thing.
Smart enough not to growl at me, I bet.
After review of the past 8 pages of comments, I don't believe anyone has asked the obvious question...
Why did he announce this now, just 2 weeks before ER? Why not wait for ER?
IMO, some really good news is about to come out in ER and they don't want it buried by this.
Disagree, employees need this to stay and he needs a solid pop this quarter for convertible notes. He knows they are trying to cut this off so he has to pay in cash vs stocks. Folks, this is all about making sure SP get's back well above $360.
And again, as some have said, it's more about cash flow. Possibly a bear trap as well. SP might even go lower before Feb to catch even more bears.
This is actually negative to me - $Tsla is now much less likely to surpass $360 which means they cannot convert some of the upcoming debt as they wanted. More pressure on capital, less $ for shanghai.
Daily stock movements and downgrades/upgrades are unrelated.
Yes, that's the bottom line, but not a reason for such a long, persistent SP at high volume. The fewer the number of parties that are responsible for the majority of the volume, the easier a steady-state is to establish.
IMHO.
1000 job openings not 10,000I took notice that days after announcing layoffs at SpaceX, Elon Musk also announced that 7% of its full-time workforce would be let go at Tesla as well. Tesla grew by 30% last year, which is more than can be supported.
I think the biggest issue is that this seems to settle the demand issue - at least for North America. Is there sufficient consistent (not pull forward) demand for M3s at a price where Tesla can make a sustainable profit? Musk says no - at least not without pushing down costs and increasing volume at the same time.I think the main thing the market doesn’t like or understand from the letter was,
“This quarter [Q1] as with Q3, shipment of higher priced Model 3 variants (this time to Europe and Asia) will hopefully allow us, with great difficulty, effort and some luck, to target a tiny profit.”
Layoffs could of been shrugged off, even might of sent the stock up. Q4 not as good as Q3, some minor selling. Why, though, great difficulty, effort and luck for (maybe) a tiny profit this quarter? Kind of clashes with where we thought the company is for no apparent reason.
Just occurred to me, this might be due to Q1 including some downtime for S/X production in order to make changes for the battery packs, and/or some hiccups already showing up in doing this.
This would be consistent with Tesla not giving a reason for the “tiny profit” guidance ... they do not want consumers to know the S/X offerings are being upgraded. It would seem there would need to be a pretty good reason to not include some sort of explanation with what was a considerable downgrade of expectations for Q1 and was ambiguous about future quarters being impacted as well.
Of course, there’s also the dropping of the 75 kWh S/X we already know about which already hinted that they are about to upgrade the offerings.
Maybe, But this violent price action + Elons letter today on profitability in the short term might be the catalyst for a downgrade. If not imminently, likely after Feb 5th ER
I think the main thing the market doesn’t like or understand from the letter was,
“This quarter [Q1] as with Q3, shipment of higher priced Model 3 variants (this time to Europe and Asia) will hopefully allow us, with great difficulty, effort and some luck, to target a tiny profit.”
Layoffs could of been shrugged off, even might of sent the stock up. Q4 not as good as Q3, some minor selling. Why, though, great difficulty, effort and luck for (maybe) a tiny profit this quarter? Kind of clashes with where we thought the company is for no apparent reason.
Just occurred to me, this might be due to Q1 including some downtime for S/X production in order to make changes for the battery packs, and/or some hiccups already showing up in doing this.
This would be consistent with Tesla not giving a reason for the “tiny profit” guidance ... they do not want consumers to know the S/X offerings are being upgraded. It would seem there would need to be a pretty good reason to not include some sort of explanation with what was a considerable downgrade of expectations for Q1 and was ambiguous about future quarters being impacted as well.
Of course, there’s also the dropping of the 75 kWh S/X we already know about which already hinted that they are about to upgrade the offerings.
Don't let short sellers dictate what you do with your business. When someone's getting eliminated, the propert hing to do is notify them on the earliest Friday possible after the decision's been made.I didn't read it all, but this is my question:
why Elon did not wait a week for this news?
He would have hurt the shorts with all the puts expiring worthless today... instead he hurt the (gambling) longs, probably pissing off some major investor who wrote those puts.
I don't know nothing, but it seems bad timing and self-inflicted.
There is something I don't understand?
PS: of course, I'm sorry for the people who got fired, but doing it today doesn't do them any good.
Next monday after burning the shorts would have been better.
When the letter is to employees and the major announcement that would concern the employees most is 7% layoffs you dont say the situation is a bed or roses.
So you take a downbeat tone and then do better then what you claim and state they all executed the plan in the future.
I used to camp on TSLA, but now I swing trade it with exception to my core holdings. To do otherwise, you miss out on too much in the way of gains...Unfortunately, and I know I’ve said this many times, Tesla is a swing trade stock. It trades on short term sentiment. It crawls up 15% and dives 15% constantly
One day it will break out. But it will take something big
My $ went from $tsla to $nvda. Their new chips are great! I think it will go much higher. Good place to park $tsla fund for now.I guess looking at NVDA's action today will somewhat negate this disappointment