Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register
  • We just completed a significant update, but we still have some fixes and adjustments to make, so please bear with us for the time being. Cheers!

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

kanweg

Member
Jun 11, 2020
357
2,908
Europe
Ok somewhat OT but relevant.

Ford is offering lump sum buyouts for ex employee pensions.

Does anyone familiar with acquisitions know whether this would be a move that a company takes when it wants to be bought? (Reasoning: I can imagine that a company is more interesting for a buyer if it doesn’t come with hughe financial obligations.)

But Stretch2727 can probably get a better return on investment than ford’s pension fund (I take it they wouldn’t invest in Tesla).
 
Last edited:

Mo City

Active Member
Jul 17, 2016
1,792
10,564
near Houston
Ok somewhat OT but relevant.

Ford is offering lump sum buyouts for ex employee pensions. We have to Nov 12 to decide. It's relatively small pension as I worked there 10 years, but left almost 20 years ago. The benefit at age 65 is fixed when you leave. I decided to take the lump sum into an IRA for 2 reasons.

-I don't know they will be around in 10 years and don't want to have to deal with any issues if they go to bankrupt.
-More funds to by TSLA.

I have mentioned a few times before, if I had not worked for Ford, not sure I would be invested in TSLA. My opinion is the OEM's do very little engineering and most of what little innovation is there comes from suppliers. The transition will be difficult if not impossible if they do not vertically integrate. Vertical integration is totally against the industry paradigm which they have been ingrained.
Four years ago, an ex-employer offered the same to me and it became my first investment in TSLA. It was most definitely not a desperate financial move for them.
 

Stretch2727

Engineer and Car Nut
Nov 8, 2015
489
3,329
New Jersey, USA
Does anyone familiar with acquisitions whether this would be a move that a company takes when it wants to be bought? (Reasoning: I can imagine that a company is more interesting for a buyer if it doesn’t come with hughe financial obligations.)

But Stretch2727 can probably get a better return on investment than ford’s pension fund (I take it they wouldn’t invest in Tesla).

I think it is a move that lessens future uncertainty for the company/pension. These are defined benefit plans that have to pay fixed benefits at certain ages. They have investments behind them but the payouts are fixed and do not change based on the pension investment return. According to the actuary reports the Ford pension is underfunded but this can vary widely based on how the stock market does.

Most companies in the US have moved away from these type of plans to defined contributions (401K, etc ) where the participants do the investment elections and the company and employee do the contributions. The contributions are paid in real time and the risk (current and future) is minimal for the company.

Yes, I will do better investing myself even if I only get a modest return.
 

ABCTG

Supporting Member
Apr 8, 2017
295
2,722
3RFTS
Not sure if this has been posted:

SR+ RHD in Australia & UK have a delivery timeline of November 2020. Australia also got a range increase + $7k price reduction + power trunk

For wrong side EU drivers, it’s February 2021 for SR+ and November 2020 for LR.

So reading between the lines, It seems SR+ to EU, AU, HK, NZ etc will be Made In China LFP

And from now on, all Made In Fremont SR+ with Li ion cells will be only for the North American market :eek:


The vehicles at Giga Shanghai that have protective layers over the front and sides are getting priority loading onto the transporters.
The protection would suggest longer range shipping.

Screen Shot 2020-10-17 at 10.06.41 AM.png
Screen Shot 2020-10-17 at 10.07.11 AM.png
 

Curt Renz

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2013
6,276
78,939
USA
Last evening Elon tweeted that he had neck bone surgeries. Although not stated, the year of the surgeries is likely 2019 when the scar was first noticed. His tweets seen below should clarify the situation, and calm the rumors spread after people became concerned about the scar on his neck.

upload_2020-10-17_12-49-42.png
 
Last edited:

amolina

Member
Jan 24, 2020
248
2,565
Berlin
Just read this comment on twitter:



The delusion in people is strong. I dont think GM will be in bsuiness in 2025, so the idea that they even have an R&D budget in 2024 is pretty optimistic if you ask me.
People really are like rabbits in ICE headlights, staring at the total collapse of the global fossil fuel industry under full glare, pretending it is not happening. I am sick of trying to point out the stunningly obvious. Just happy to take those peoples lifes savings and make them my own. *sigh*.
This is great for us. Since this means, there is still a massive opportunity for us an investor. Great success
 

BrianZ

Supporting Member
May 30, 2018
144
1,302
California
I believe the variance we are seeing in the features and ranges across the different models and trims is the result of large scale manufacturing difficulties and risk management. Tesla has a bunch of improvements, but they're selectively choosing only a subset of the improvements to be added to only certain models. There are multiple advantages of doing it this way. Let's take the 5% battery energy density improvement for example. Tesla is at volume production now. Switching to a new battery cannot happen overnight. It has to ramp up. The machines have to stop, make changes, then get back online. Tesla cannot stop all machines to make changes all at the same time since that'll stop production. Therefore, only a subset of the machines can be updated at one time, and therefore those machines cannot provide all models with the same battery, only certain models. I bet the new cells are only going into the M3 LR AWD and S Performance only right now, as it has the biggest gain, and it is befitting of the name "Long Range". That's likely why the Model S LR had no range increase as it is still using batteries from the old lines, but the performance has the new batteries from the new updated lines.

There is also the risk management side. Adding a ton of changes at once is risky. Again, Tesla is at volume manufacturing now, so the risk is much bigger now. So it makes sense to spread them out, either over time, or over different models. Then when all of those improvements are proven to work well, then it makes sense to move towards integrating all improvements to all models. We can see Tesla already using this risk management strategy with Giga Berlin having the latest tech (most risk, low volume, slow ramp), and China, Texas and Fremont on the old tech (low risk, fast ramp, maintain high volume). Once Berlin tech is proven, it gets updated to all factories. We're seeing this on the small scale right now with tons of feature changes right now.

Give it a few months for manufacturing to catch up, and all improvements should appear on all models, and the variance will no longer be there.
 
Last edited:

Knightshade

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2017
11,150
14,459
NC
The delusion in people is strong. I dont think GM will be in bsuiness in 2025, so the idea that they even have an R&D budget in 2024 is pretty optimistic if you ask me.
People really are like rabbits in ICE headlights, staring at the total collapse of the global fossil fuel industry under full glare, pretending it is not happening. I am sick of trying to point out the stunningly obvious. Just happy to take those peoples lifes savings and make them my own. *sigh*.


Elon, who tends to be pretty optimistic in his timelines, thinks we MIGHT get to 30 million new EVs sold per year by 2030 (by everyone, not just Tesla).

In recent years annual new car sales are north of 80 million a year.

Leaving over 50 million new ICE vehicles a year, 10 years from now, someone will still need to be producing.

It's certainly possible GM won't be among those doing it, but I think the speed with which some folks think ICE manufacturing is going away entirely does not match with what's possible under even the most optimistic timelines of ramping of worldwide battery production (and needed infrastructure improvements especially in less developed countries)-

And as we have seen, nobody other than Tesla appears to be acting in a way that would bring about even THAT optimistic of a scenario (30 out of 80 million a year new cars being EVs by 2030)
 

Featsbeyond50

Member
Apr 27, 2019
199
510
Washington
?? Enterprise Values already incorporate cash position.
Yeah but the cash is buried. It would be nice for people to see Tesla has lower debt and more cash. I'm sure there's still a lot of people, maybe most people, who think Ford, GM, Toyota and all the rest can out do Tesla in EV whenever they want to.

The average person doesn't understand that Tesla has already won. It's like watching two Grandmasters playing chess. I can be watching and think the match looks close. Another grandmaster could drop by, look at the board, and say games over, 13 more moves and it's done. I'd like more people to see that Tesla has won.
 

Criscmt

Member
Feb 18, 2020
211
561
San Francisco
TSLA Q3'20 Earnings Forecast & The Future of this Blog

In summary, I am forecasting Q2 => Q3:
  • Automotive Revenue: $5.18B => $7.65B
  • Automotive Sales Gross Margin Excluding Credits: 20.7% => 21.3%
  • Total Revenue: $6.04B => $8.82B
  • Gross Profit: $1.27B => $1.99B
  • Total Gross Margin: 21% => 22.5%
  • EBIT: $327M => $750M
  • GAAP Profit: $104M => $468M
  • Non-GAAP EPS: $0.44 => $0.87
  • Free Cash Flow: $418M => $693M
View attachment 599387
View attachment 599388

Thanks again for your awesome work.
Has there been any change in Tesla's business that might influence you to revise your SP chart? Of course, there's macro change with interest rates at near zero. Thus higher multiple than what you had in that chart.
As it is today, the SP is above your SP estimation post Q2-2020 ER.

I am of the view that shares are right now priced to perfection.
Only a very significant beat over consensus will likely give a >5% bump to SP post ER.
The only catalysts I see pushing SP higher is Q4 ER, or S&P inclusion anytime from now.
Perhaps S&P inclusion prospects is still providing strong support from going down further than it ever did in the last several weeks.
Any thoughts?
 

TheTalkingMule

Distributed Energy Enthusiast
Oct 20, 2012
6,363
21,835
Philadelphia, PA
Elon, who tends to be pretty optimistic in his timelines, thinks we MIGHT get to 30 million new EVs sold per year by 2030 (by everyone, not just Tesla).

In recent years annual new car sales are north of 80 million a year.

Leaving over 50 million new ICE vehicles a year, 10 years from now, someone will still need to be producing.
That is not remotely what he said. It was:
"Seven years for sure to 30M+ new fully electric vehicles per year, six years maybe. Five years is possible, but unlikely. An extra year makes a giant difference when it comes to exponentials."
Basically implying exponential growth turns the whole market over somewhere between 2026 and 2030.

30M in 2027
40M in 2028
60M in 2029
Etc.....
 

Mo City

Active Member
Jul 17, 2016
1,792
10,564
near Houston
And as we have seen, nobody other than Tesla appears to be acting in a way that would bring about even THAT optimistic of a scenario (30 out of 80 million a year new cars being EVs by 2030)
It's still only 2020. I think it's very likely non-Tesla global annual production of EVs is 10 million by 2030.

10 years is a very long time.
 

ammulder

'98 GS400 -> P3D+
Apr 11, 2019
931
3,017
Philly area
Elon, who tends to be pretty optimistic in his timelines, thinks we MIGHT get to 30 million new EVs sold per year by 2030 (by everyone, not just Tesla).

In recent years annual new car sales are north of 80 million a year.

Leaving over 50 million new ICE vehicles a year, 10 years from now, someone will still need to be producing.

Even supposing this were true (see The TalkingMule's response)... I have to think the infrastructure changes are going to start kicking in by the time there are 30 million EVs on the road. Even though that's a small fraction of the existing fleet, gas stations were barely profitable to begin with (all the ones around here have added sandwich or donut shops to try to make money). Dealerships will have to start weaning themselves off ICE maintenance and repairs... somehow? Highway taxes are going to need to be rethought. Not to mention, a Tesla 5+ years from now and fuel efficiency requirements 5+ years from now are together going to leave ICE cars looking a lot less competitive (they're going to what, have more turbochargers than cylinders and shut down the engine every time you coast?).

Put all that together, I think it's going to start feeling like ICE is staring down a tsunami.

So whatever year EVs hit 30M, maybe there will still be 50M ICE cars sold, but what are they going to be? Will they continue to try to undercut Tesla on price, even if that means under $20K (considering a $25K EV with cost of ownership advantages)? Will they try to outclass Tesla (and perhaps Lucid) at the high end on luxury? (Too niche.) Will they be stupendous diesel models so they still have better towing range? Maybe all the biggest cars, Suburbans and Minivans, will stay ICE where an EV still can't be efficient enough in that form factor. I don't know, but I don't see the 50M being the meaty middle of the market. If they lose pickups, what large and profitable segments are left other than big SUVs?

When 30M EVs are sold, isn't everyone buying an ICE by then going to grit their teeth and bear it, not hold their head up with pride?

Aren't the OEMs going to be doing the math... collectively we sold 50M ICE this year... from the EV factories ramping around us and the demand we're seeing in the market, looks like that will be 35M ICE next year and 15M ICE the year after... um, I'll take that golden parachute now please?
 

Cal1

Member
Sep 22, 2013
424
178
Battle Ground WA
Please excuse my layman's understanding of the above abbreviated earnings doc. What were the profits without BEV credits? Seems like that is what everyone poo poo'd us (yes those are real words) on last time. I thought they said we wouldn't have had a profit without seeing credits.
 

jerry33

(S85-3/2/13 traded in) X LR: F2611##-3/27/20
Mar 8, 2012
19,516
21,710
Texas
Please excuse my layman's understanding of the above abbreviated earnings doc. What were the profits without BEV credits? Seems like that is what everyone poo poo'd us (yes those are real words) on last time. I thought they said we wouldn't have had a profit without seeing credits.
This won't actually answer your question, but if Tesla had not spent money on R&D to sell superior cars, there would be no EV credits, so it's just as legitimate as any other source of income. Other companies could have done this too, but they didn't so now they have to purchase credits from Tesla. The negative analysts and media will always turn positives into negatives by twisting the facts to fit their point of view.
 

Fred42

Member
Dec 24, 2018
887
2,488
Pennsylvania
Not sure if this has been posted:

SR+ RHD in Australia & UK have a delivery timeline of November 2020. Australia also got a range increase + $7k price reduction + power trunk

For wrong side EU drivers, it’s February 2021 for SR+ and November 2020 for LR.

So reading between the lines, It seems SR+ to EU, AU, HK, NZ etc will be Made In China LFP

And from now on, all Made In Fremont SR+ with Li ion cells will be only for the North American market :eek:
If I accept that, it still leaves the question of why no ships have left Pier 80 for Europe with LR 3's at this late date.
 

Fred42

Member
Dec 24, 2018
887
2,488
Pennsylvania
Does anyone familiar with acquisitions know whether this would be a move that a company takes when it wants to be bought? (Reasoning: I can imagine that a company is more interesting for a buyer if it doesn’t come with huge financial obligations.)
I doubt that a trip through bankruptcy court to shed obligations can be avoided before Ford looks good enough to a potential buyer. As with Fiat's purchase of Chrysler.
 

Knightshade

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2017
11,150
14,459
NC
Even supposing this were true (see The TalkingMule's response)... I have to think the infrastructure changes are going to start kicking in by the time there are 30 million EVs on the road. Even though that's a small fraction of the existing fleet, gas stations were barely profitable to begin with (all the ones around here have added sandwich or donut shops to try to make money).


Certainly I'd expect stuff like interstate exits consolidating to 1 or 2 gas stations instead of 8 or 10...

But as you point out, EVs will still be a tiny fraction of TOTAL cars on the road at that point.

Let's consider just the US for a second... ~18 million new sales a year... but a fleet of ~280 million vehicles.

So you're talking 15.5 years to turn over the whole fleet on average, and that's if -100 percent- of new car sales were EVs ever year for 15.5 years.

In 2020 they're estimated to be what 3% maybe?


Dealerships will have to start weaning themselves off ICE maintenance and repairs... somehow?

I suspect for a while you'll see higher maintenance suggestions for legacy EVs (hell Teslas used to be higher too).

And again in the next 10 years the vast majority of the overall fleet on the road will still be ICE and still need the normal crap done to em.

Another good chunk of dealer $ comes from financing and that'll stick around.

But again long term like gas stations you'll end up seeing consolidation and shrinkage.... Maybe just 1 or 2 Ford dealers in an area instead of 5 and so on.


Highway taxes are going to need to be rethought.

Already happening- a number of states have pushed EV registration taxes to try and compensate for lost fuel revenue.

My own state has done so.... though the amount they're charging is still a fair bit less than I was paying in gasoline taxes (pre-covid).


Not to mention, a Tesla 5+ years from now and fuel efficiency requirements 5+ years from now are together going to leave ICE cars looking a lot less competitive

Well, the election will impact that second one a bit, certainly HOPE you're right on that though.

Still, it was an easier argument to make when gas was $4/gal instead of under $2 as it is currently. (and folks are still driving quite a bit less too)



Put all that together, I think it's going to start feeling like ICE is staring down a tsunami.

So whatever year EVs hit 30M, maybe there will still be 50M ICE cars sold, but what are they going to be? Will they continue to try to undercut Tesla on price, even if that means under $20K (considering a $25K EV with cost of ownership advantages)? Will they try to outclass Tesla (and perhaps Lucid) at the high end on luxury? (Too niche.) Will they be stupendous diesel models so they still have better towing range? Maybe all the biggest cars, Suburbans and Minivans, will stay ICE where an EV still can't be efficient enough in that form factor. I don't know, but I don't see the 50M being the meaty middle of the market. If they lose pickups, what large and profitable segments are left other than big SUVs?

Goes back a bit to who is supplying the other 10 million EVs.... If Ford manages to get a successful, profitable, electric F-150 out there they can probably still keep kicking out $15,000 fiestas to undercut 25k EVs too.

If GM has a successful and profitable EV Hummer maybe they can do the same.

Or maybe they both fail and Rivian is suddenly the second biggest american car company after Tesla in 2030?


When 30M EVs are sold, isn't everyone buying an ICE by then going to grit their teeth and bear it, not hold their head up with pride?

Aren't the OEMs going to be doing the math... collectively we sold 50M ICE this year... from the EV factories ramping around us and the demand we're seeing in the market, looks like that will be 35M ICE next year and 15M ICE the year after... um, I'll take that golden parachute now please?


As I said- there'll be consolidation.

There's 20 major car companies right now (sold more than 1 million vehicles annually)- Tesla's not there yet but will be in 2022 with the 50% YoY math (could be 2021 by it'd be a hell of a ramp at 3 factories)

Anyway of those 20

5 of em are Chinese companies...6 are Japanese... 5 are European... 3 American (one half American being FCA), and the remaining one is South Korean.

Wait, actually, PSA (peugeot citroen) is merging with FCA, so that's already down to 19.

And realistically 17 as Nissan, Mitsubishi, and Renault have been cross-owned in an alliance for a while now.

Now among those companies, is roughly 83ish million cars sold.

But 1/4 of that is just the top 2 (Toyota and VW)...and 1/2 are the top 5 (those 2 plus Hyundai/Kia, GM, and Ford)

Some won't make it. Maybe most won't.

Some probably will though.

Remains to be seen who.




That is not remotely what he said. It was:

Basically implying exponential growth turns the whole market over somewhere between 2026 and 2030.

30M in 2027
40M in 2028
60M in 2029
Etc.....


My apologies. He cited 2030 as the date Tesla would "probably" hit 20 million itself prior to.

Let's say they hit it in 2029. Whom do you believe would be making the other 40 million EVs in your forecast above?

Because right now Tesla is making more EVs than anyone else by a wide margin.

And THEY only hit 20 million in 2030 if they maintain 40-50% YoY unit sales growth every year for 10 years (~45% annual) from 2020 numbers gets you there).

So given everyone else is starting much smaller they need even higher/faster unit growth in EVs, every year for a decade, to get there.

Which other companies do you see actually doing that rather than dragging their feet like they have been and forcing tens of millions into new ICE vehicles because there's still not 80 million new EVs to replace the 80 million ICE cars sold a year?
 
  • Love
Reactions: gabeincal

About Us

Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.

Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


SUPPORT TMC
Top