Rob Maurer made an interesting point in today’s video. By lowering price on SR and increasing for Performance, Tesla can sell more cars for a given supply of batteries if more people choose the SR instead of LR or Perf. The end result is slightly lower margins but more revenue and profit. Additionally, every car on the road will become a source of recurring revenue from premium connectivity and upcoming FSD subscription.
ARK invest has put out the same reasoning (don't know where I read or heard this specifically, but it was ARK I'm sure):
ARK believes that a fully autonomous Tesla Network ridehailing app will be a much greater source of profits for Tesla than their automotive division selling cars.
Therefore the "long con" is to allocate resources (i.e. battery cells) in such a way as to maximize the amount of Tesla vehicles out there.
Since they are "appreciating assets" as Elon likes to call them since the cars in the fleet can become autonomous from one day to the next by OTA updates, the Tesla Network will provide way more revenue by having more cars (in more locations).
While this still sees somewhat futuristic, the logic is solid and I for one follow it. Better to have more low range Tesla's out there than fewer performance versions.
Added bonus is that people see more Tesla's on the road this way, increasing the strength of the Tesla brand.
TL;DR: very exciting years ahead!