Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register
  • We just completed a significant update, but we still have some fixes and adjustments to make, so please bear with us for the time being. Cheers!

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

Featsbeyond50

Member
Apr 27, 2019
199
510
Washington

new_sneakers

Member
Oct 19, 2018
67
937
Brisbane
What are the new products this year that Elon and Zac alluded to on the Q4 2020 conference call?

I am slightly suspicious about Elon’s suspicious downplaying of solar efficiency improvements in his recent Joe Rogan interview.

I agree with the part of his answer that said solar will never replace charging, but he basically said solar would not progress past 25% efficiency.

To me, it is likely new panels will break through this mark. Electrek has an interview on this topic today.

I wonder if he is sandbagging, avoiding the Osborne effect, or waiting for a reveal (or just being honest, or choosing to make his answer a flat and simple no).
 
  • Informative
Reactions: SpaceCash and KMCC

JohnnyEnglish

Member
May 7, 2018
211
983
UK
What are the new products this year that Elon and Zac alluded to on the Q4 2020 conference call?

I am slightly suspicious about Elon’s suspicious downplaying of solar efficiency improvements in his recent Joe Rogan interview.

I agree with the part of his answer that said solar will never replace charging, but he basically said solar would not progress past 25% efficiency.

To me, it is likely new panels will break through this mark. Electrek has an interview on this topic today.

I wonder if he is sandbagging, avoiding the Osborne effect, or waiting for a reveal (or just being honest, or choosing to make his answer a flat and simple no).
The new product referred to by Elon is included in the Q4 ER pack on page 8 which is headed vehicle capacity. So it is a vehicle, not a solar product.
 

st_lopes

Member
Aug 3, 2020
279
2,493
Canada
Rob Maurer made an interesting point in today’s video. By lowering price on SR and increasing for Performance, Tesla can sell more cars for a given supply of batteries if more people choose the SR instead of LR or Perf. The end result is slightly lower margins but more revenue and profit. Additionally, every car on the road will become a source of recurring revenue from premium connectivity and upcoming FSD subscription.

Accounting at its finest!

If we assume the battery pack in an SR requires 80% of the cells of a Performance model, 5 SR can be sold with same number of cells as 4 Performance models.

So, as long as your margin is not 20% higher in a Perf model, you’ll always come out ahead with that mix of models - just on total auto margin.

Plus with the Tesla fly wheel, you actually want to have 5 vehicles on the road instead of 4. More premium connectivity subscribers, more accessories sold, more FSD, more future arcade, more robotaxi, more owners considering solar for home, more potential insurance customers, etc.
 

2daMoon

Member
Nov 25, 2020
464
3,032
Terra
Reuters:
Analysis: Carmakers wake up to new pecking order as chip crunch intensifies

Analysis: Carmakers wake up to new pecking order as chip crunch intensifies

No paywall and does a decent job covering the current landscape in chip making for the automotive sector.
Nice write up providing more evidence of how the legacy OEMs have rested on their laurels raking in money to hang beneath their golden parachutes by avoiding investment into innovation of aging product lines.

This does not actually come as a surprise, does it?

Now, which companies are the ones that need to be concerned about the competition coming?
 

jeewee3000

Member
Sep 1, 2015
974
5,103
Belgium
Rob Maurer made an interesting point in today’s video. By lowering price on SR and increasing for Performance, Tesla can sell more cars for a given supply of batteries if more people choose the SR instead of LR or Perf. The end result is slightly lower margins but more revenue and profit. Additionally, every car on the road will become a source of recurring revenue from premium connectivity and upcoming FSD subscription.
ARK invest has put out the same reasoning (don't know where I read or heard this specifically, but it was ARK I'm sure):

ARK believes that a fully autonomous Tesla Network ridehailing app will be a much greater source of profits for Tesla than their automotive division selling cars.

Therefore the "long con" is to allocate resources (i.e. battery cells) in such a way as to maximize the amount of Tesla vehicles out there.

Since they are "appreciating assets" as Elon likes to call them since the cars in the fleet can become autonomous from one day to the next by OTA updates, the Tesla Network will provide way more revenue by having more cars (in more locations).

While this still sees somewhat futuristic, the logic is solid and I for one follow it. Better to have more low range Tesla's out there than fewer performance versions.

Added bonus is that people see more Tesla's on the road this way, increasing the strength of the Tesla brand.

TL;DR: very exciting years ahead!
 

Nocturnal

Supporting Member
Aug 23, 2018
6,054
30,078
In the middle
ARK invest has put out the same reasoning (don't know where I read or heard this specifically, but it was ARK I'm sure):

ARK believes that a fully autonomous Tesla Network ridehailing app will be a much greater source of profits for Tesla than their automotive division selling cars.

Therefore the "long con" is to allocate resources (i.e. battery cells) in such a way as to maximize the amount of Tesla vehicles out there.

Since they are "appreciating assets" as Elon likes to call them since the cars in the fleet can become autonomous from one day to the next by OTA updates, the Tesla Network will provide way more revenue by having more cars (in more locations).

While this still sees somewhat futuristic, the logic is solid and I for one follow it. Better to have more low range Tesla's out there than fewer performance versions.

Added bonus is that people see more Tesla's on the road this way, increasing the strength of the Tesla brand.

TL;DR: very exciting years ahead!
Even before robotaxis are workable there is a benefit. Assuming the take rate of FSD is the same with performance and non-performance (probably not but can't be too far off) then selling 100 base models with 20 FSD packages is more profitable than selling 80 performance cars with 16 FSD packages. Not the actual cell math of course, just random numbers. Plus that means more vehicles providing data.
 

ZeApelido

Active Member
Jun 1, 2016
2,676
20,798
The Peninsula, CA

bkp_duke

Active Member
May 15, 2016
4,957
15,686
San Diego, CA
What are the new products this year that Elon and Zac alluded to on the Q4 2020 conference call?

I am slightly suspicious about Elon’s suspicious downplaying of solar efficiency improvements in his recent Joe Rogan interview.

I agree with the part of his answer that said solar will never replace charging, but he basically said solar would not progress past 25% efficiency.

To me, it is likely new panels will break through this mark. Electrek has an interview on this topic today.

I wonder if he is sandbagging, avoiding the Osborne effect, or waiting for a reveal (or just being honest, or choosing to make his answer a flat and simple no).

For current technology, there is a theoretical limit on efficiency, and 25% is darn close to that. You need to change things up significantly (i.e. perskovites, etc.) to break past 25%. It may happen, but it won't happen overnight, and Elon knows that. It took 3+ decades to get from the single-digit efficiencies to where we are now (~22% in the best panels). That was a very slow walk, not overnight advances.
 

TheTalkingMule

Distributed Energy Enthusiast
Oct 20, 2012
6,363
21,835
Philadelphia, PA
I was quoted 12 weeks for delivery of a solar roof at a cost of $55k then Fed & State credits bring it to $43k ,Now waiting on engineering to do their thing.I live in South Jersey, next on the list is Starlink.
That's awesome, so great to see reasonable pricing! Did Tesla also monetize your SRECs as an upfront discount? If they did, and you don't need the cash right now, I'd think about keeping them yourself. It's an amazing option Tesla offers, but I think you only end up with about 2 years of credits worth of value.

Don't forget to share your experience in the Energy Forum, we are interested!

Can't wait to see your Cybertruck fishing of the beach in Brigantine. 14 weeks til Memorial Day.
 

2daMoon

Member
Nov 25, 2020
464
3,032
Terra
For current technology, there is a theoretical limit on efficiency, and 25% is darn close to that. You need to change things up significantly (i.e. perskovites, etc.) to break past 25%. It may happen, but it won't happen overnight, and Elon knows that. It took 3+ decades to get from the single-digit efficiencies to where we are now (~22% in the best panels). That was a very slow walk, not overnight advances.

Something occurred to me, is there any reason a "battery layer" could not be built into every solar panel/solar roof tile? Further expanding the capacity of storage at any given PV installation?

Well, other than the obvious reason that the raw materials are all going into the batteries for cars for the near future.

Once raw materials and battery production have ramped would this be a far-fetched idea, or might doing so be a way to increase overall storage and add value to the PV products?
 

About Us

Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.

Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


SUPPORT TMC
Top