Tdlr
Sweet interior, has some impressive gimmicks, drives like a boat, laggy UI, software not impressive, and I guess there's the gas version of this car.
You know that last question mkbhd asked gets me thinking. "Would you rather buy this or the gas version of this car?". Unless I'm am a tree hugger, why would I buy the electric version if it's more expensive but everything else being equal? I guess better instant torque vs charging infrastructure? But if these legacy companies keep making multiple versions of the same car then it's kind of hard for ev adoption to happen.
Thanks for posting this.
Here is a little more,
His top 5 Mercedes EQS features:
5 Ambient lighting
4 Tech: Very good HUD. Has 8 USB ports, 2 HDMI ports, 2 wireless chargers, fingerprint sign in, sideview mirror adjustment
3 Interior luxury: Great ventilation, seat adjusters, built-in seat massagers, a screen (including audio) for every passenger, rear center armrest has a Samsung tablet (from 2014, LOL!)
2 Seat-specific commands: Each seat will respond to voice commands from the occupant. The software was "pretty functional" and can get better going forward
1 Hyperscreen infotainment center: His "only constructive criticism" was the giant Hyperscreen is not up to snuff. Ugly, slow, unresponsive, dated UI. Compared it to Windows Media Player from the 2000s
He said the vehicle was a "boat to drive".
He also "loves this car is going to exist".
Bottom line: The review is absolutely dripping with sarcasm. Just look at his top 5 features list. He says at the beginning the EQS is the perfect "type" of car to go electric right now, i.e, a big luxury sedan. But his comments about this
specific vehicle are what we call "faint praise".
Bottom line 2: He was quite the verbal gymnast and I bet laughed his head off between takes. He didn't want to slam the car because ticking off Mercedes and their fans would be bad for business. It's was an exclusive first look and he's the first person outside of Mercedes to use the car.