2daMoon
Mostly Harmless
Well, at least Nikola is still there for us to depend on ...Yeah, that's gonna leave a mark... (NASDAQ: RIDE)
View attachment 673244
Lucid Motors may be headed the same way.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, at least Nikola is still there for us to depend on ...Yeah, that's gonna leave a mark... (NASDAQ: RIDE)
View attachment 673244
Lucid Motors may be headed the same way.
True but seriously misleading in the first part. By far the leading source of GOOG income is 'sponsored links' and other 'placements'. Direct solicitation of business search related revenue is a gigantic business. Facebook and Twitter is closely related activities. Windows/Microsoft have little in common with the others from a revenue perspective. Alphabet does have Android that has a revenue stream similar to that of Windows, but the rest of their businesses are divergent....
Google search engine never advertised. Advertisements have negligible or no impact on the adoption of Facebook, Twitter and Windows...
This may be an indicator of a new business for Tesla to consider developing.Anyway, thanks and please feel free to respond with any good mountain or island salespeople because we are about a 2x from that not being a joke any more.
Cheers everybody!
But do you think he read past the first paragraph?I have a friend who knows I'm a Tesla fan and routinely refers to Elon as "your boy" when bringing FUD to the discussion. He sent a link to an article titled "Cheap Electric Cars Won't Happen in America Until We Fix the Federal Tax Credit" which seemed to sort of offer the Hong Guang as an example of where the USA needs to be.
I responded with:
Well, cheap electric cars won't happen for a couple of years, and the most significant reason is the current level of battery production, not the tax credits. Though those will certainly help once manufacturers are actually producing vehicles. After batteries, the production volume is the next biggest problem. There is only one car company producing BEV cars in sufficient numbers to make an impact, and without tax credits they are sold out months in advance on the Model 3 and Model Y (the most affordable models) despite doubling production year over year. People are having no problems buying Teslas without tax credits as fast as they can build them.
The tax credit will help, however, it can only be applied when there is an actual vehicle produced to apply it to. The legacy OEMs need to step up to the plate if they want their share of that action.
My boy's company is tracking at or ahead of targets that were made public back in 2014 or 2016, when he stated how the company was projected to grow at a rate of 50% per year, and, that they would produce 500,000 cars in 2020. Everyone laughed at him, back then. (like they did when he said he would make reusable rockets) The laughter got kinda quiet at the end of last year when the target production reached the stated goal on time.
A couple of years back Tesla revealed plans to offer a $25K car in ~2023. It will likely be produced in China first, Texas will probably get another factory built in Austin for that model alone, as will Berlin. Each may have their own version of it designed by each country's local design teams. If the tax credit does come, this quite affordable $25K Tesla car will be a steal at $15K for a full-featured battery electric vehicle.
As opposed to the sub-standard go-kart like the Hong Guang in China. Anything like that car would fail on the US standards for safety. The top five spots at NHTSA for safest cars tested are currently held by Tesla models. Though there is the Arcimoto, if bare-bones is what the US customer is wanting.
The $25K Tesla ($15K after the proposed tax credit) ought to be a perfect example of the "Cheap electric car" that will also actually be produced in sufficient volume. This will happen with or without the tax credit.
As battery production increases, the cost of producing batteries is lowered (based upon Wright's Law), Tesla have traditionally passed that savings on to the customer. If the rate of reduced battery cost continues to follow the trend over the past five years or so, by the time that car is in production it might be sold for $15K before tax credits. Imagine a $5K full-featured BEV after applying the tax credit. Would that be cheap enough?
This aspect of how Tesla operates is why so much FUD exists in the media regarding Tesla's profitability. They put all they can back into growing the company, rather than paying share holders dividends, purchasing advertising, etc. Tesla’s mission is To accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy.
Consider the numbers for a little perspective. Ford is offering ~50K of the Mach-E this year, and likely about the same volume of the F-150 Lightning next year or the year after. They don't have the batteries to build more than that. The plans they have for battery production won't come to fruition until 2024 or 2025. Plus, they are grappling with the fact that every BEV they sell takes away a sale of an ICE car that they are also producing. I don't envy the old guard OEMs, they are between a rock and a hard place. Search on "Innovator's Dilemma" for a good explanation of what these OEMs face.
Tesla has 1 Million orders for the Cybertruck on the books and may deliver that many over the next two or three years while "the competition" is delivering only tens of thousands of BEV pickups. Tesla are also very likely to (mind-boggingly) double their overall production and deliveries from 2020 in 2021. The Tesla Model Y is expected to become the best selling model on the planet in the next 12 to 18 months. Not just among EVs, the best selling model of all cars.
Tesla's long-term target has always been an unbelievable 50% production growth each year, which they have consistently met or exceeded for a decade. With Austin and Berlin coming online, 2M is very likely next year as they ramp production. Once they are up to speed, those three factories could put out 2M cars per year, each. Austin and Berlin factories will have their own battery production facility on site and each of the China, German, and Texas factories total cost to build was less than either GM or Ford's annual advertising budget, and takes about a year to do. The huge building in Austin has claimed status as the largest building in the USA. I think this means they beat out USAA HQ in San Antonio for that honor.
When will Ford and GM (and all the others) bring similar BEV production numbers to the table, so that there are more vehicles for the tax credit to be used on?
Cheap Electric Cars Won't Happen in America Until The Manufacturers Build Them.
All I can do is put it out there. In all honesty he may actually read it, though he rarely has responded to similar novels from me.But do you think he read past the first paragraph?
I thought Lucid had access to Saudi deep pockets?Yeah, that's gonna leave a mark... (NASDAQ: RIDE)
View attachment 673244
Lucid Motors may be headed the same way.
To coin a phrase, Lucid may now be out of their depth, so to speak.I thought Lucid had access to Saudi deep pockets?
Recent report posted here is that the Saudi money is about out and Lucid needs the SPAC money to proceed.I thought Lucid had access to Saudi deep pockets?
I thought Lucid had access to Saudi deep pockets?
I thought Lucid had access to Saudi deep pockets?
I might be said to have limited knowledge of Chinese marketing. Despite that a Chinese tech firm is the largest single client for my colleagues, so I am fairly well informed about Chinese tech practices.It is also suggesting China production is going well.
Q3/Q4 they can always export more overseas, plenty of untapped denand especially for Model Y.
Tesla China has typically been good at marketing and customer engagement.
My impression of China is that most messages are spread by social media, or having promotional events.
Does China have traditional advertising?
A lot of the media is government owned and funded.
We need someone with local knowledge to comment.
Re: Tesla Annual Shareholders Meeting
Recently Elon said that the meeting this year would take place at the end of July or in August. Last year they announced the meeting on August 21rst for September 22nd. Exactly a month prior.
That means we should get an announcement very soon. We should also get notice if they will be asking for approval to increase the number of shares they are able to issue. We might get a signal of a potential stock split in the next 2 to 4 weeks !
Ahhh, a prime number lover.Any guesses for day of the month?
I'm guessing 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, or 31.
Why, well I guess there is the fundamental “liquidity experiment” being done AFTER investing over a billion dollars. Makes zero sense to me. Engineers test, test, test. They don’t buy an enormous quantity of a resource only to qualify it later.Why can’t we just accept the reason for the initial purchase and subsequent testing for liquidity experiment as the, you know - reason?!
CNBC - 2.5 hours ago: GM, Ford are all-in on EVs. Here’s how their dealers feel about it
Excerpt:
Many auto dealerships are embracing the electric vehicle transition, but there are concerns about costs to be paid, staff training and impact on lucrative service department business.
estimates that dealers could see $1,300 less revenue in service and parts over the life of each EV they sell.
Even though 70% of aftermarket service of ICE vehicles is handled by independent shops, franchise dealers don’t want to cede EVs to them, especially as consumers familiarize themselves with battery charging and other peculiarities. “The EV owner might trust the dealers more to perform service than the aftermarket shops earlier in their ownership period,
It seems to me that all this suggests that Tesla is reaching maturity in factory approach so there will be significant differences between products built in various factories. That really is not unusual even in traditional OEMs. There have often been localized versions of products that reflected local legal or market conditions.An interesting thread from Sawyer yesterday that I haven't seen mentioned fully. This was originally sourced from Troy's Patreon (and apparantly shared with permission):
I won't post the whole thread but basicially the main points are:
1. China exports of Model Y to Europe from Q3
2. Model S Plaid will be exported to Europe in October.
3. Tesla is still planning to shut down Model Y production at Fremont when Giga Texas starts making the Model Y 2.0. However, they are now considering whether the shutdown will be temporary or permanent.
4. Texas Model Y will be slightly different than the Berlin version.
5. Model Y production in Shanghai has a Build Failure Rate of less than 3% which is exceptionally low in the industry. The target for Model Y 2.0 in Berlin is less than 2%.
The first and seconds points I think I'd heard about earlier. The suggestion that Tesla would shutdown Y production in Fremont is new to me but does make some sense given the differences. However there would be some overlap until Austin can ramp enough to replace Fremont capacity.
I would also add to this that I suspect Shanghai will also start making a Model Y2.0 around a similar time to Austin. This may just be in the form of front and rear castings as the current works are roughly doubling the existing casting area. Initial batteries may not be structural and may have to wait until CATL can build their new factory or Tesla can source their own.