You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The bill is written by lobbyists so nothing really surprising given what has already been done to exclude Tesla. Will wait to see what is actually signed but if anything it does not hurt Tesla long term given they are so far ahead of every other US manufacturer and demand is already so high.
CPI data appears favorable to stocks as it seems this will delay the timeline in tapering. Doesn't seem like the market is too convinced however with crypto / gold still rallying. Will know more after FOMC meeting on the 22nd.
a quarter of the time a cop is directing traffic, they are making mistakes themselves. Also can any person in a dark clothes and hat redirect my car?
To clarify Kim did state recalibration helped which can be seen in her second video. She has also driven with a FSD beta driver while out in SF (Whole Mars Catalog I believe) and reported there was a major improvement in how well FSD handled SF roads compared to the cow pasture roadway found in Newport RI. This is what prompted Elon's comment that FSD training currently favors the SF area. I find this encouraging as the NN will help address many of the differences in how well FSD drives in different locations. Would also be nice to see people give Kim a break especially after she went thru a lengthy explanation of why so many disengagements.She recalibrated, drove again, and no improvement was seen.
It looks like the Big 3's plan is to make almost exclusively hybrids with the minimum sized battery required. The 7kwh minimum rises to 10 kwh for 2023 to 2031, but with declining costs that battery will still cost well under $1000. Customers will get a $9000 rebate, so if they sell 6 million of these hybrids per year it will cost the government over half a trillion dollars in subsidies.Yeah, that makes no sense.
Also makes no sense that a hybrid with a 7kWh battery (aka <$1k battery) could get a $9k rebate to the auto-maker. That is essentially a subsidy for the ICE powertrain. That is ridiculous and to use Rob's word; appalling.
This is why I love supporting Rob. His in-depth analysis is second to none.
I am doubtful data from the dirty dozen will help Tesla's case. Those other "driver assist" systems are so much weaker, that owners simply do not use them (they are practically useless as they can't even keep the car in the lane through a mild curve -- see Sandy Munro video for example). With negligible low amount of use, they probably do not have any crashes (due to low statistical probability of occurrence), therefore it will not make Tesla look good in comparison.Oh I do hope they make this data from the dirty dozen public before Christmas! This is good I think for playing on a level field, but watch for the cheaters.
Given the inferior, often vastly inferior, telematics in legacy auto cars- I wonder how much of this info they actually have.
She mentioned about 8 minutes into the video that "so far this drive has been a lot better than yesterday's"...but at that point she had mostly been in traffic and hadn't encountered any challenges for FSD. After that point, she had some big issues come up. Can't really go by what she said before the drive got interesting.To clarify Kim did state recalibration helped which can be seen in here second video. She has also driven with a FSD beta driver while out in SF (Whole Mars Catalog I believe) and reported there was a major improvement in how well FSD handled SF roads compared to the cow pasture roadway found in Newport RI. This is what prompted Elon's comment that FSD training currently favors the SF area. I find this encouraging as the NN will help address many of the differences in how well FSD drives in different locations. Would also be nice to see people give Kim a break especially after she went thru a lengthy explanation of why so many disengagements.
Hopefully the data that's provided is quantified along with the number of miles driven with each of the systems engaged. But when you think about it, it's likely that none of the other automakers even HAVE this telemetry, so you're probably right. I mean really...Toyota, how many miles were driven with your TACC engaged? How would they know?I am doubtful data from the dirty dozen will help Tesla's case. Those other "driver assist" systems are so much weaker, that owners simply do not use them (they are practically useless as they can't even keep the car in the lane through a mild curve -- see Sandy Munro video for example). With negligible low amount of use, they probably do not have any crashes (due to low statistical probability of occurrence), therefore it will not make Tesla look good in comparison.
Rob just went off on Twitter.It looks like the Big 3's plan is to make almost exclusively hybrids with the minimum sized battery required. The 7kwh minimum rises to 10 kwh for 2023 to 2031, but with declining costs that battery will still cost well under $1000. Customers will get a $9000 rebate, so if they sell 6 million of these hybrids per year it will cost the government over half a trillion dollars in subsidies.
6m X $9k X 10yrs = $540B
Diabolical but clever - it solves their cell supply problem and gives them (in their mind) a possibility of competing against Tesla.
Not just the worst drivers but also the worst roads
It has to be presented statistically, but that's a give-away so as you say we'll be looking at total numbers of disengagements in a given period. However, collisions with emergency vehicles might show some truth as there's only 11 there for Tesla.I am doubtful data from the dirty dozen will help Tesla's case. Those other "driver assist" systems are so much weaker, that owners simply do not use them (they are practically useless as they can't even keep the car in the lane through a mild curve -- see Sandy Munro video for example). With negligible low amount of use, they probably do not have any crashes (due to low statistical probability of occurrence), therefore it will not make Tesla look good in comparison.
Exactly my thoughts....no way they have this data....maybe on some punch cards in a closet?Given the inferior, often vastly inferior, telematics in legacy auto cars- I wonder how much of this info they actually have.
I have to disagree....my belief is for any examples of collision that they might come up with, how will they be able to show they did more than Tesla to try and avoid?I am doubtful data from the dirty dozen will help Tesla's case. Those other "driver assist" systems are so much weaker, that owners simply do not use them (they are practically useless as they can't even keep the car in the lane through a mild curve -- see Sandy Munro video for example). With negligible low amount of use, they probably do not have any crashes (due to low statistical probability of occurrence), therefore it will not make Tesla look good in comparison.
This is both a sensible step and probably positive. It introduces comparison with the performance of other ADAS systems. It seems likely that this statistical information will not be available from some (if not most) of the automakers. The elements regarding driver engagement and detection of first responder etc also allows comparison.
Based on a debrief from my mobile repair chap last year:She recalibrated, drove again, and no improvement was seen.