2daMoon
Mostly Harmless
So, um, you have found your special purpose then?I'm just happy to be in there somewhere.
Cheers!
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, um, you have found your special purpose then?I'm just happy to be in there somewhere.
Cheers!
@Crowded Mind
OK, I'm on a computer where I can reexamine this and see where the confusion comes in.
At 2:23 when he is about to have the big moment of the first hard disengagement the speed limit is 25 and the setting is +1 MPH allowing 26.
View attachment 720824
One second later it's 30 mph +1 and 31.
View attachment 720825
As a human I scan left to right or right to left and as I was watching the numbers changed, I saw 25 mph on the right then looked left and saw 31.
The car accelerates towards a barrier, 26,27,28, 29,30 before he disengages. No +5 in play there.
He reengages, enters the cones and it's still set for 30, +1, 31 and it disengages forcing him to take over, again no +5 in play.
At 7:42 he moves it up to +5.
At 12:30 he stops, when he starts up again it goes back to +1
at 12:50 he puts it back to +5
at 17:55 there is a curve with lots of parked cars and the car is still doing 5 over. It made me nervous just watching it, but I guess Rob doesn't mind 30 in a 25 with tight margins.
at 20:38 he chooses a new destination while doing 30 in a 25, the speed limit changes to 30 in the next second, and the max speed becomes +1. Was that because of the new destination or because rob used the scroll wheel? Either way easy to miss the complex interaction there.
next three disengagements are all at +1.
at 31:12 he goes back to +5
next time he switches destinations it goes back to +1 and stays there the rest of the video.
----------
tl;dr I was concerned watching it last night at 1x speed but reviewing it tonight at 1.3x to 2x speed and paying closer attention to the transitions I see some details I missed on the first pass.
In a city I didn't know, at night, I would have driven slower in all the areas with parked cars or pedestrians. But Most of the areas I was concerned about were in +1 mode, only one was in +5.
So was I wrong, yes, at least partially.
But let's work with the premise. It seems to me $4500 far exceeds the actual assembly costs, If it's 100 combined man-hours that's 45$/hour. Does anyone have a better estimate for how much actual UAW labor is required per vehicle?
Did the last 27 times this idea was debunked not work for you?
Unions have pretty specific requirements and definitions under US law, you can't just have some employees go "Hey we have a 'union' it just doesn't do anything" and have that count.
Huh? That is laser cleaning* by a company that makes cleaning lasers: P-laser Industrial laser cleaningI think his comment refers to the fact that what was shown in that video isn't actually a laser
So, um, you have found your special purpose then?
His name is Shilling?Jalopnik article that is bollocks.
Tesla's Germany Plant Is Still A Big Gamble
By Erik Shilling
No link, author believes Tesla will most likely pollute the water. Oh man I want to rant and swear about paid journalist swill.
US F1 GP in Austin the weekend of the 23/24 United States Grand Prix 2021 - F1 RaceWhats going on in Austin next weekend? My son invited us down for when he gets engaged. So went to book hotel room and the cheapest place is a Motel 6 $313 per night. Next is $659 per night. Just crazy. Could a lot of Tesla employees be coming down for some serious testing and launching of Model Y production?
I had no idea union labor was a $4500 disadvantage per car.I didn't see this posted. Looks like some significant support for the UAW addendum in the EV bill.
More than 100 U.S. lawmakers urge Pelosi to back union EV tax credit
More than 100 U.S. House lawmakers on Tuesday urged Speaker Nancy Pelosi to keep a $4,500 tax credit incentive for union-built electric vehicles (EV) in a massive spending bill.www.reuters.com
Is that not basically a direct statement that UAW leads to an uncompetitive enterprise? I'm surprised he wasn't a bit more clever with this and frame it as simply supporting unions which are platonically good things not to be questioned because of how much they did for labor back in the 1890s.
But let's work with the premise. It seems to me $4500 far exceeds the actual assembly costs, If it's 100 combined man-hours that's 45$/hour. Does anyone have a better estimate for how much actual UAW labor is required per vehicle?
This continues to be an absolutely absurd estimate. At let's say an average of $8,000 that's predicting ~2m uses of this subsidy over 10 years. seriously wtf?
Tesla is likely one of the most scrutinised companies that's ever existedJalopnik article that is bollocks.
Tesla's Germany Plant Is Still A Big Gamble
By Erik Shilling
No link, author believes Tesla will most likely pollute the water. Oh man I want to rant and swear about paid journalist swill.
While failing to complete the math of BEVs (see recent JB Straubel quote) Tesla gets the scrutiny instead. This is the path of the disruptor.Tesla is likely one of the most scrutinised companies that's ever existed
Tmoz did not say anything about without supervision. He said ready to handle driving in your local city, with a near zero chance of intervention.
For AAPL the primary reason is a cut in iPhone production due to chip and other supply chain problems. It will be amazing if Tesla manages to avoid the chip issues, but other supply chain and finished vehicle shipping still will be. huge issue this quarter.Check AAPL today. The stock tanked AH so I assume a few contracts got executed. There are like six of those spikes.