Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Agreed. From my understanding, this stock is trading somewhat like one headed for a blow-off top, where the pullbacks are short and shallow. I think there are valid reasons for that based on circumstances surrounding the stock, ie. fundamental developments and short interest, but nevertheless it bears watching.
Ya, like a saw-toothed shape as if being prevented from going too negative after each attempt. Strange.
 
Y
Geotagging data shows Tesla Model Y vs. Ford Mach-E interest for each US state

Geotagging data shows Tesla Model Y vs. Ford Mach-E interest for each US state

View attachment 500497

I have been unable to replicate this with Google trends. Comparing "Tesla model y" and "Ford mustang e" over periods of 7,30,90 days and 1, 5 years for web search, image search, news search and youtube search.

The closest was 90 days image search, but even that was not very close.

All searches are more favorable to Tesla, here is a typical example:
Model-Y-vs-Mustang-E.png
 
The Icelandic word for "stupid" is heimsk(ur), from an earlier meaning more along the lines of "ignorant". It ultimately derives from heima (at home). The notion being that you can hear about the world beyond your doorstep, you can spend your whole life reading about it, but unless you actually see it yourself, experience it, get to know it personally, you'll never really understand it. "Heima alinn".

That Fortune article, asking people to divorce themselves from actually knowing the company and to only look at cherry-picked, distorted (at times beyond recognition) info that the author wants them to, is asking them to be heimsk. Ignorant. Stupid. Don't actually look into things yourself. Just take the information that I give you at face value. Trust that you're getting an accurate picture with your blindfold on.

Honestly, it's so terrible, it should be bookmarked. It'll be hilarious a few years from now ;)
There's a word for 'STUPID' in New York City, too: TSLAQ. :p

TSLAQ-Busters.10-Q.jpg

Cheers!
 
It definitely feels to me like typical Wall St "wants" to introduce a lot more volatility in the stock with heavy swings back and forth but it seems like everyone's holding and/or buying in anticipation of that earnings report.

You have to think a lot of people bought-in for the first time above the current levels in anticipation of what's to come. And I think Q4 will be a strong positive catalyst and meet or beat their expectations.

So the bottom line is I'm not really worried. But it does suck for anyone having call options expiring between now and then.:(

Yes, we are spoiled! ;)
 
I was thinking about this very informative post and out of curiosity ran some back of the envelope calculations to get a sense of the scale of ambition implied by Elon’s comments in interviews.

1. 1.5M vehicles in 2021 and then 3M in 2023 is approx 41% compounded growth in production in Elon’s mind.

2. Elon then says he thinks “long term” production is 20M. So then I wondered, if you simply continued 41% compounded, how long would it take to hit 20M starting from 3M in 2023? I got roughly 5.5 years, but rounded that to 6 years...then rounded 2029 to 2030 to just say it will be by the end of the decade.

3. Then I pulled an ASP out of thin air of $40K for the 20M cars in 2030 and then got a ridiculous number for revenues: 800B in revenue.

4. Then I said what if there’s 20% margin? And I got a crazy number: $160B.

5. Then I made up another number for SG&A and R&D spending of 40B annually in 2030, and got $120B.

6. Then I said ok what if there’s a 20x multiple on that? And I got $2.4T.

7. Then I said ok what if there’s 300M shares outstanding then? What’s the share price? And I got $8000 per share.

8. And then I said: oh, I forgot about Tesla Energy, the FSD revenues in each car, the revenues from Tesla’s share of the robotaxis network, Supercharger revenues, insurance, and any Services Revenue...and then my brain melted.

9. Another thing is that if ~600K cars requires 39GWh batteries, then 20M cars (33x) requires 1.3TWh of batteries. So right now I’m in a bit of disbelief about these ridiculous numbers from these back of the napkin calculations. Looking forward to Battery Investor day to see what the path is to that level of production.

Fun napkin math. One added wrinkle: 367,500 in 2019 to 3 million in 2023 is 69% annual unit growth. Elon has estimated growth at 50-100% per year.
 
If you feel uneasy, don't do it. That right there is a warning sign that you know, for whatever reason. Anything can happen, even low probability events.

I don't talk about my investments with much of anybody (pretty much just my wife). When I bought into $TSLA I was passionate enough about it and said something to my mother that she ended up putting a pittance into it. Which has done well, but it was her choice.
You guys are forgetting Florida is on the Mach E list. My guess is older folks don't even know about Tesla Model Y.
Build it and they will come.
i was in Orlando last week, and it seemed like every other car was a Model 3. There are quite a few in Palm Bay Area. Tesla is quite well known in central Florida. The model Y well sell well here.
 
You have to think a lot of people bought-in for the first time above the current levels in anticipation of what's to come. And I think Q4 will be a strong positive catalyst and meet or beat their expectations.

So the bottom line is I'm not really worried. But it does suck for anyone having call options expiring between now and then.:(

Yes, we are spoiled! ;)
I'm very glad my handful of calls expire in Feb or March. My 1/7 calls didn't hit the ideal spot but I still can't complain.
 
I don't expect horrible, but it's unclear how good it's going to be. We don't have much info on deliveries in Q1. We have some info that delivery dates are pushed back and maybe China is sold out, but how many cars is that for? We will have to see what they say during Q4 earnings.

We have Franco Mossotto's shipping spreadsheet, which indicates 5 or 6 ships (the question as to the number revolves around a possible manifest error) arriving to Pier 80 by January 30th.

How does this measure up to 2019?

Pier 80 ships arriving by 30 days from quarter start, 2019Q1-2020Q1 (estimated):

Q1'19: 5 (4 EU, 1 CN)
Q2'19: 5 (2 EU, 2 CN, 1 JP)
Q3'19: 4 (2 EU, 2 CN)
Q4'19: 9 (4 EU, 3 CN, 2 KR)
Q1'20E: 5-6 (1 KR, 4-5 TBD)

Note that China accounted for an average of two ships in the first 30 days from start of quarter in 2019. Even with GF3 up and running, Tesla is likely to match or exceed Q1-Q3 2019 ship arrivals at Pier 80 through 30 days from quarter start. This picture will become much clearer over the next 3 weeks as we see February scheduled arrivals and learn the destination of currently scheduled arrivals.

In other words, I find nothing alarming in the shipping data at this time to indicate a substantial drop in deliveries, particularly given the existence of GF3 and rumors of very high demand, and the ability of Tesla to deliver substantial MIC M3s this quarter, there.

But I do agree that the picture remains unclear. The question of a US price drop continues to loom. The later into Q1 we get without such a drop, the more bullish I will become for Q1 numbers. I am also keeping a sharp eye on inventory discounts (for personal and investment reasons), but as expected those are virtually nonexistent at this time due to Q4 inventory reduction.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like your problem is with the words "near vertical". Sorry, but I had to find a word for hatchbacks (e.g. not liftbacks) which didn't involve using the word hatchback. Because normally just saying "hatchback" is good enough to exclude liftbacks. But since this conversation is you trying to include liftbacks as "hatchbacks", I had to pick different wording. I chose that to distinguish vs. "near horizontal" rear "hatches" (aka liftbacks).

If you don't like that wording to describe hatchbacks, forget it. Choose whatever wording you want. They're still very distinct from liftbacks, whatever wording you use.

But thanks for offering a reference to a definitive source, "marti5 on torquecars.com".

Note that Tesla Model S is a liftback. Tesla refers to it as a sedan. Not a hatchback. Indeed, it's very common for liftbacks to just be called sedans.

Ask a designer to draw a hatchback. 99 times out of 100 it'll end up looking like in the "top 10 hatchbacks" link of yours. Because that's what the word "hatchback" invokes.
Not sure who you're arguing with, but most North Americans don't get hatchbacks, as they're not popular here and very few are being sold. I wouldn't be surprised that for most people word hatchback evokes fuzzy images of anything that has fifth door, or that it's basically poorly defined. While, in Europe, when you say hatchback, everyone knows exactly what that is, Golf like type of car...
 
There's a word for 'STUPID' in New York City, too: TSLAQ. :p

View attachment 500514
Cheers!

In all seriousness. How good does the quarterly report have to be to justify the gains at this point. Long term obviously the sentiment here is it's still a bargain. But the recent price increase seems to indicate the warning report is going to be mind blowingly good. I actually expect a dip when it comes out because as awesome as a company Tesla is the report can only indicate so much.
 
In all seriousness. How good does the quarterly report have to be to justify the gains at this point. Long term obviously the sentiment here is it's still a bargain. But the recent price increase seems to indicate the warning report is going to be mind blowingly good. I actually expect a dip when it comes out because as awesome as a company Tesla is the report can only indicate so much.

The report itself is unlikely to move the SP as much as what Elon discusses on the call including guidance; he has said he will outline the next few years.
 
Two points:
  • The EIA forecasts that natural gas will fuel 39 percent of overall electricity generation in the PJM Interconnection region by next year, up from 31 percent in 2018 (Sep 19, 2019)
  • SpaceX Raptor rocket engines use natural gas for propellant
Elon should still be their hero. Jus' sayin'. ;)

Cheers!
@Artful Dodger
a few data point, NewJersey, Pennsylvania and Maryland (ya know, PJM)(a goodly part of it)
Trillions of BTU 2010
1-Solar 0.48 <--------
2-Nuclear 1300.00
3-Hydro 39.18
4-Wind 18.14 <---------
6-Natural Gas 482.00
7-Coal 1412.00

8-Biomass 47.40
9-Petroleum 12.30
15-Wasted Energy 2240.00 (ie, electricity made and not used)

Trillions of BTU 2014
1-Solar 8.68 <------

2-Nuclear 1303.00
3-Hydro 40.56
4-Wind 37.32 <---------
6-Natural Gas 684.40
7-Coal 1030.00

8-Biomass 47.90
9-Petroleum 14.20
15-Wasted Energy 2124.00

Energy Flow Charts
Nat gas up, Coal down, Wind UP, Solar way up (from teeny tiny tho)
data is 5 years old
entire US for 2018
Energy_2018_United-States.png
 
In all seriousness. How good does the quarterly report have to be to justify the gains at this point. Long term obviously the sentiment here is it's still a bargain. But the recent price increase seems to indicate the warning report is going to be mind blowingly good. I actually expect a dip when it comes out because as awesome as a company Tesla is the report can only indicate so much.

The report itself is unlikely to move the SP as much as what Elon discusses on the call including guidance; he has said he will outline the next few years.

Two things I'm particularly interested in for Q4 earnings report, and which I think could send the stock price higher despite the recent bull run:

  1. Q4 profits sufficient such that a Q1 profit of $1 dollar will make Tesla eligible for S&P inclusion.
  2. Guidance.
EDIT: Conversely, I think relatively conservative growth projections for 2020 and beyond and/or weaker than expected Q4 profits will result in a sharp pullback. Just my $0.02.
 
Last edited:
  • Helpful
Reactions: SW2Fiddler
Not sure who you're arguing with, but most North Americans don't get hatchbacks, as they're not popular here and very few are being sold. I wouldn't be surprised that for most people word hatchback evokes fuzzy images of anything that has fifth door, or that it's basically poorly defined. While, in Europe, when you say hatchback, everyone knows exactly what that is, Golf like type of car...

North Americans absolutely get hatchbacks.
It's just that they are willing to pay an extra $4k for them to be taller, so they get crossovers instead.

Elsewhere in the world, people are buying taller hatchback and crossovers as well.