humbaba
sleeping until $7000
and yet that is a sentiment expressed here: that the legacy will go out of business due to lack of effective switching to EV. That is what I'm arguing against. Sure, some may fail completely -- though I suspect only after and despite significant government intervention.Of course they're not done in that scenario. There's no need for anyone to make a Tesla killer--the situation reminds me of the old saying: "You don't need to outrun the bear. You just need to outrun at least one of your friends." Tesla's not going to be able to supply every vehicle in the market. Ever. So any particular manufacturer doesn't have to top Tesla--it just needs to top enough of the other remaining manufacturers so that when the dominoes start to fall, it remains standing.
The idea that a legacy manufacturer can be successful at a low cost, entry EV -- something not even Tesla can do at this point -- is IMO silly for that reason. How could a company without any battery expertise or production leapfrog Tesla? I just can't see it happening. And insisting that they need to at least match Tesla just doesn't match reality. Even the ipace is being sold.
At the high to mid points there is still plenty of room for non-Tesla models and will be for the foreseeable future. All the talk about how the Taycan doesn't measure up -- while true -- is almost irrelevant. If the Taycan had somehow been worse than either the ipace or the etron there'd be a point, but it isn't.
While I wish that the legacy OEMs would quit dragging their feet on EVs I don't think their current efforts are little enough to doom them. Not yet, anyway.