juanmedina
Active Member
Tesla should come to South Carolina and put their factory next to BMW's world's biggest manufacturing plant.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tesla should come to South Carolina and put their factory next to BMW's world's biggest manufacturing plant.
Ok, that was over the top.4x vol (31.1M). Its the zombie apocalypse for Shortzes.
I think you'll find there are quite a few of them.Who's the dude on the forum here that has several thousand shares?
Lutz is probably just cleaning up his legacy by saying; "OK, now Tesla is a car company that knows what they are doing".
As if that erases all the untrue and horrible things he said about them in the past.
Interesting. That's the kind of brainstorming I was looking for. That would bode very well indeed! Cheap insurance against the price rising above $700 before 1/17/2020.
If that's what's going on we are in for quite a ride in the next few days!
I agree with you. I simplified the cases to illustrate a point. It's all about the expected returns, there is a mathematical correct answer once we assign the probability to each scenario. I remember tivoboy said it would drop to 140 first. Some people got out to wait for the "best entry". Now they probably missed the train.
That being the case, we easily and very accurately can call the entire group - we exclude "individuals" - the professional fund managers. So why cannot they beat the market? It is tautologically very simple. They ARE the market. Except, unlike the set of indices one needs to use to indicate market performance - S&P 500, Russell 3000, DJI - every one of these managers carries a cost of business - transaction costs and various management fees. The collective performance of all fund managers CANNOT do better than the "market's" performance. It is a mathematical certainty.
This group cannot do it in the short term - call it "one day"; they cannot do it in the long term - call it "30 years". Period. It is possible and a statistical probability - 'tho not a certainty - that in the long run there will be that manager who consistently has beaten the market. There is an absolute certainty that some managers' long term performance in toto has beaten the market. Peter Lynch did, George Soros and his original partner Jimmy Rogers has/did; Warren Buffet has, and of course there are others. But not not not the universe of all of them.
I have never been this excited to get up in the mornings. Checking $TSLA within second of opening my eyes has taken priority over all things tech or biological. I keep thinking we're at the top of the rollercoaster ride... click click click, but it keeps going!
Still holding all shares. I want my certificates framed and not let anyone short mine ever!
50% loss...
Remember fellahs, shorting is the inverse of investing. When you invest money long, your downside is 100%, and your upside is the moon... With shorting, your upside is 100%, and your downside is the moon.
Anyone who shorted at bleow $245 now, has a greater than 100% loss if they haven't covered.
People who shorted in the $300-350 range that the stock liked to trade in from 17-19 have lost about half their money.
Even people who shorted at the higher ranges the stock was trading at are looking at ~30% losses now.[/QUOTE
$39. That's to ensure my TSLA shares earn at least a small profit. Please don't say that makes me a weak long.
OK, that's impossible or I would have been cashed out shortly after purchase.
In reality I keep raising my stop limit to slightly less than double the current price. My broker says that is sufficient to prevent my shares from being lent to short sellers. Others here may want to do the same, although some brokers may require a tighter stop. [/QUOT
...and if you go back far enough... before anyone got to Bob Lutz...I remember seeing Bob Lutz on CNBC at least 3 years ago coming on CNBC saying how great electric cars will be in the future. He said "You will be able to just plug one in and it will go 500 miles on a charge". After that he totally changed his tune. It's almost like somebody just paid him off or something. Does anybody else remember the TWO FACES of Bob Lutz?
I own one of each June 500,520 and $530 call. I paid $300 for all three of them. They are now worth over $16,000. If the stock isn't over $500 by june I will loose the whole $16,000. Of course I can sell before. I had some higher up options but I already sold them hoping to buy back cheaper but that didn't happen.Has Elon sold?
No.
Has Larry Ellison sold?
No.
So why sell? Why even think? Don't even look at your portfolio. No point! Unless you are a REAL bull and you want to sell those $600 strike calls when they are in the money. This isn't even bullish af yet. We are what, 25% over the previous trading range? LOL you think this is bullish af? You don't know what bullish af is yet.
...and if you go back far enough... before anyone got to Bob Lutz...
Clearly the people who were until recently paying Bob Lutz to say anything negative he could think of about Tesla have stopped paying him - either because they ran out of money, they can now see Tesla is unstoppable, a multi-year contract ran out, Bob Lutz is refusing to do it, or some other reason.[/QUOTE
I only heard the bull Lutz one time but it just stuck in my head.
I remember seeing Bob Lutz on CNBC at least 3 years ago coming on CNBC saying how great electric cars will be in the future. He said "You will be able to just plug one in and it will go 500 miles on a charge". After that he totally changed his tune. It's almost like somebody just paid him off or something. Does anybody else remember the TWO FACES of Bob Lutz?