glen thomson
Member
It's not so much that the numbers are better or worse compared to this or that other virus, be it regular flu or ebola, it is the response of quarantine, lockdown and shutdown, to this new and as yet unknown virus that will already affect the global economy.
Empty streets in Wuhan, population 11 million.
China is now the 2nd largest economy in the world.
The Lombardy region of Italy which is now under shutdown is the industrial powerhouse of the whole country which is the 8th largest economy in the world.
These 2 YouTube videos I found are mostly non alarmist and more factual;
"it's not so much the virus, it's the response to the virus; Lockdown"
"in 2003 when SARS hit, China was 4% of global output, now China is 17%"
The red cross advises having 2 weeks supply of food and water. It wouldn't hurt to have that much on hand, maybe stock up a little just in case. I'm thinking might as well get it now, because it would suck to fight the panic buyers if it comes to that.
Survival Kit Supplies
Yep totally agree that its the affect of lock-downs and quarantines that you should look at when it comes to economic effects not the amount of deaths, obviously the more infectious and deadly the virus the more intense the lock-downs need to be. From what im seeing it seems very likely there will be many more lock-downs and quarantines around the world to try and slow and contain the virus until we have a vaccine, as it now appears to be past the point of quarantines being enough to eliminate the virus like they managed with Sars.