dgodfrey
Member
As others have touched on, the fact that most of us came from some other brand and willingly "switched teams" based on the evidence before us, should define our brand loyalty as only skin deep. Whereas, those that won't even consider Tesla because it's some mysterious Silicon Valley Automotive wannabe could rightfully be lumped into a religion.Another way to say that would be that you are not “religious” about Tesla. This seems healthy. This is investing and not cultish behavior.
Cramer started his show this evening with a rant about broad selling of quality stocks because of a religious conviction toward cryptocurrency and COIN. He followed this with a segment on waiting and buying good companies at IPO at a rational price.
Later he did a takedown of recent failing EV stocks (not Tesla) and how they had over-promised. Then (on the date of Madoffs death) he wrapped up the EV segment with a promise to bring back his “Wall of Shame”.
Religions are beliefs without evidence.
Discussions with TSLAQ, or fudsters, or Porsche fanatics or Tesla fanatics borders on this at times. Although, I've never owned a Porsche, they make some impressive cars but we can at times let our partiality cloud our opinions even on objective metrics. Nobody wants to admit they bought the wrong car or made a poor decision so we tend to defend the indefensible e.g. projected timelines for FSD.
I like the response when discussing one EV over another though in just supporting the decision to not buy an ICEV. My biggest caveat when this comes up isn't so much that Tesla is the best choice for any situation, but look at what it does better than the competition and decide if that's important to you enough to overlook not having Corinthian Leather.