Are they attempting 600 this week?
Or are these the fake ones that get pulled last minute to confuse the market?
Or are these the fake ones that get pulled last minute to confuse the market?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They're not that fresh, was 17k of them yesterday alreadyAre they attempting 600 this week?
Or are these the fake ones that get pulled last minute to confuse the market?
View attachment 659456
600 would put TSLA squarely in a bear market. I don't think it'll get that low given the current headlines & numbers.Are they attempting 600 this week?
Or are these the fake ones that get pulled last minute to confuse the market?
View attachment 659456
Thank you. This is great!...Thanks for sharing, a worthwhile watch.
I agree that Tesla and Idra seem cut from the same cloth, a match made in heaven. Not sure if Tesla should buy Idra, however, because Big Tech is already under the monopoly microscope from politicians. Tesla might be better served by continuing to foster their relationship with Idra and seeing where it goes, allowing them both maximum flexibility and agility. In any event, Idra's casting machine coupled with SpaceX/Tesla's proprietary materials is a winning combination for both companies and one that is not likely to go away anytime soon. (By the way, does anyone else here feel like Idra's promotional videos are shot by the same people who do Tesla's? They appear the same to me....just a thought. Also funny that Idra's CEO has adopted the "Gigapress" term, yet another head nod to Tesla)
Tesla's relentless focus on fewer parts and factory volumetric efficiency cannot be stressed enough. When CT comes out, the simple three-part cast frame bonded to the folded origami-like body will save so much time, money and factory space as to render all other competitors nearly obsolete. Old Auto already has too much 19th-century inertia and dead-weight strapped to them, I cannot see how they are going to avoid the Tesla tsunami.
If you're feeling sad about today's SP action, watch this video, it may cheer you up.
Re when the first robotaxi ride will take place, no idea - BUT where, my guess would be Las Vegas first since they already will have a fleet with monitoring drivers there re with the Boring tunnel.
Re when the first robotaxi ride will take place, no idea - BUT where, my guess would be Las Vegas first since they already will have a fleet with monitoring drivers there re with the Boring tunnel.
Re when the first robotaxi ride will take place, no idea - BUT where, my guess would be Las Vegas first since they already will have a fleet with monitoring drivers there re with the Boring tunnel.
OT... Seals?Thank you. This is great!...
If there is any air in the cavity when they shoot the aluminum in, the part will be porous, bad and unreliable. This says the seal perimeter has to be clean and easily cleanable, or super long path, or forgiving seal geometry and you need two presses.
Maybe two stages of evacuation like an o-ring cavity that is a vacuum chamber that buffers the exposure of the main cavity to air leaks.
Really bad situation when it does not work. Standby must be hot...
So always in pairs running at 40% max rate. When a part quality drops below threshold on one, the settings on the other get changed to 80% max run rate.
Sort of says 24 hour production as getting it started might take a few practice shots. Better if it runs continuously with no starting issues.
This says TSLA will be motivated to produce based on return on invested capital... Sort of says you don't want customers waiting for sales, so take speculation out of the demand motivation with very stable pricing to keep demand stable. Boats can be a helpful way to buffer demand. That means overseas markets.
Elon should just ignore it. But I think this is a grey area. Chief engineer implies that you were the main guy building the thing (to me at least), VP of Engineering could have been a very hands off role.Hmmm, it seems Elon should fact check his memory before shooting off comments on twitter:
Elon Tweets That Rawlinson Was Never Chief Engineer At Tesla, Except He Was
We look into the assertion made by Tesla CEO Elon Musk that Lucid CEO, Peter Rawlinson, was never the Tesla Chief Engineer.insideevs.com
He is (rightfully) upset when journalists are twisting facts to suite their agenda instead of reporting reality. So he should follow his own advice and not commit the same mistake. Probably, he is relying on faulty memory that is heavily colored by negative emotions toward some person he had disputes with, but that does not justify publishing false information. It is one thing to make an incorrect statement of fact during a diner conversation based on faulty memory, but it is quite another publishing it on twitter with millions of followers. His voice is more powerful than most journalists, so he should hold himself to the same standards he expect from them.
Hmmm, it seems Elon should fact check his memory before shooting off comments on twitter:
Elon Tweets That Rawlinson Was Never Chief Engineer At Tesla, Except He Was
We look into the assertion made by Tesla CEO Elon Musk that Lucid CEO, Peter Rawlinson, was never the Tesla Chief Engineer.insideevs.com
He is (rightfully) upset when journalists are twisting facts to suite their agenda instead of reporting reality. So he should follow his own advice and not commit the same mistake. Probably, he is relying on faulty memory that is heavily colored by negative emotions toward some person he had disputes with, but that does not justify publishing false information. It is one thing to make an incorrect statement of fact during a diner conversation based on faulty memory, but it is quite another publishing it on twitter with millions of followers. His voice is more powerful than most journalists, so he should hold himself to the same standards he expect from them.
Hmmm, it seems Elon should fact check his memory before shooting off comments on twitter:
Elon Tweets That Rawlinson Was Never Chief Engineer At Tesla, Except He Was
We look into the assertion made by Tesla CEO Elon Musk that Lucid CEO, Peter Rawlinson, was never the Tesla Chief Engineer.insideevs.com
He is (rightfully) upset when journalists are twisting facts to suite their agenda instead of reporting reality. So he should follow his own advice and not commit the same mistake. Probably, he is relying on faulty memory that is heavily colored by negative emotions toward some person he had disputes with, but that does not justify publishing false information. It is one thing to make an incorrect statement of fact during a diner conversation based on faulty memory, but it is quite another publishing it on twitter with millions of followers. His voice is more powerful than most journalists, so he should hold himself to the same standards he expect from them.
The Tesla blog post about the hiring clearly states "Chief Vehicle Engineer", so I would treat that as the most accurate info. (not either man's memory)Elon should just ignore it. But I think this is a grey area. Chief engineer implies that you were the main guy building the thing (to me at least), VP of Engineering could have been a very hands off role.