Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
My state senator recently emailed constituents to say that he strongly opposes closing a coal-burning power plant. I replied to him to complain of his uncaring for our health, and his bowing toward the "rent seeking landlords of the status quo".

Chicago Tribune - this morning: As legislature reconvenes, Illinois is poised to become the first state in the Midwest to ban coal-burning power plants

Excerpt:

Phasing out the combustion fuels — coal by 2035 and gas a decade later — is a key element of Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s plans to move Illinois into a clean energy future. If the Chicago Democrat can muscle his legislation through the General Assembly this week, new government requirements would speed up a transition to climate-friendly electric generation and transportation that already is embraced by some in the private sector.

Among other things, the bill would double the state’s commitment to renewable energy, with a goal of raising the amount of wind and solar power to 40% of the state’s electric generation by the end of the decade, up from 8% in 2019.

Several hurdles remain, in particular opposition from five Chicago suburbs and dozens of Downstate communities that during the mid-2000s agreed to help pay off more than $5 billion in debt for the Prairie State Generating Station — one of the Top 10 industrial sources of heat-trapping carbon dioxide in the United States.

If an Illinois resident, please consider emailing your opinion on this matter to your legislators and the governor.

Chicago Tribune - last evening:
Proposals to phase out coal and natural gas plants stall energy talks in Springfield as Senate again leaves town without a deal

Excerpt:

But disagreements remained among two key Democratic constituencies, labor and environmental groups, and shortly before 6 p.m. Senate President Don Harmon told reporters senators were again leaving town without a deal.

“The caucus made it very clear that we don’t want to vote for something that puts us in the middle of a fight between friends,” Harmon said, while predicting lawmakers would be back later this summer.

“We came up a little short today, but we will get it done,” Harmon said.

The lack of accord this spring on a plan that aims to set the state on a path to Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s goal of 100% carbon-free energy by 2050 was seen as a sign of a growing disconnect between the legislature and the Democratic governor.
 
Is this just another headfake by the MM's only to have them walk it down to $600 by Friday? I need to know so i can budget for what's for dinner this weekend 🤣
Nasdaq is recovering, my other growth stocks turned green too. Like I said, they priced in this stuff like how they priced into the doom and gloom of the pandemic..probably priced it in too much as with most over reactions
 
Even if that McLaren was being driven conservatively, once they make the last 90 degree left turn onto the straight away, I guarantee that car is floored. Even the most timid of drivers will floor it once straight and on the long straight away, even if that’s the only place they dare hammer it on the whole course. That said, it is precisely during the straight away that the Plaid exhibits total domination. The other cars look like Civics in comparison and I strongly suspect they are floored. To be totally fair, Pobst might take that last corner faster and have a better exit speed, but STILL.

See my post from yesterday:

Screenshot_20210616-153347-764.png
 
Nasdaq is recovering, my other growth stocks turned green too. Like I said, they priced in this stuff like how they priced into the doom and gloom of the pandemic..probably priced it in too much as with most over reactions
Talk about an over reaction.

Sell on the two rate increases that may begin as soon as 20 months from now if inflation continues and the job market improves....

All just window dressing... the inner workings continue to fleece the sheep.
 
Talk about an over reaction.

Sell on the two rate increases that may begin as soon as 20 months from now if inflation continues and the job market improves....

All just window dressing... the inner workings continue to fleece the sheep.
I was thinking of another verb regarding the sheep...
~~~MOD: You see? THIS is how you get your point across, provide a modicum of comedy, and avoid sounding like something caught in the floor drain of an abattoir. It. Is. Not. Difficult! (Thanks, Wip).~~~
 
From my brokerage's newsfeed:

Tesla Model S Plaid Shows Charging Speeds Of Nearly 1K Miles Per Hour

3:33 pm ET June 16, 2021 (Benzinga)

One of Tesla Inc's (NASDAQ: TSLA) greatest advantages is the Supercharger network. Tesla has over 25,000 Superchargers worldwide that enable extremely high charging speeds exclusively for Tesla electric vehicles.

This enables long-distance travel for EV owners comparable to a gasoline powered car.

Tesla's newest vehicle, the Plaid Model S, is leaving many impressed with its fast speed and quiet interior. But it seems it has also improved charging speed over its predecessor.

One of the few early refresh Model S owners posted a picture of their Model S charging at one of Tesla's Supercharger stations. The screen shows the car at 34% battery charge, and the current rate of increase is 998 miles of range being added per hour. The charging rate is also at 246kW vs Tesla's max speed of 250kW, a rate that puts Tesla among the fastest charging EVs available.


998 miles per hour at 34% battery charge @TeslaCharging pic.twitter.com/C0GiiTHwtx
— Marge ♡ (@Manic_Marge) June 16, 2021
As an electric vehicle charges and its battery becomes more full, the charging rate will slow. So although the charge rate shown in the picture will not be maintained over the entire duration of the charge, 246kW at a 34% state of charge is a big improvement in charging speed.

Tesla's older 90D Model S would have a charging rate closer to 110kW at around 34%, less than half the speed of the refreshed S.
 
I’m familiar with that charger. They just skipped past 3 other higher speed chargers within the past 25 miles. I partially blame the Tesla app. This shouldn’t happen.
Really? Where are the three faster charging locations they skipped?

1623873197221.png


The circle is 35 miles from the charging location in question.

From my looking at the map it is about 35 miles to the next closest Supercharger and it is only a 150kW one as well...
 
Shocking to see MM's not only able to keep us pegged to $600, but apparently have absolutely no need or concern to cover any naked short positions as we head into the 2Q data cycle.

Maybe this run down from $750 to $500 was more "natural" than we thought? No f'ing chance if you ask me, but maybe the reopening "rotation play" is just that strong.

Look out for TSLA when the WTI bubble bursts! It's already at insanity levels IMO.
I'm in the "more natural" interpretation of the present share move down to the 600s. I don't have intense technical interpretations to support this. Just my following of the company for nearly 10 years plus seeing a similar run previously and what happened after.

Back in 2013-2014 the shares went on an amazing run, eventually landing at ~$250 (from $30; pre-split!). For the next 5 years the shares were roughly flat, first in a 180/280 range, and then later a 280/380 range.

Somewhere in there - 2017? - Model 3 had been launched and was either late or after 'production hell' and the share price was about $250. I remember somebody commenting at the time that multiple years later, add in two new products including the one that Elon identified as essential to achieving profitability, ramped production even higher on the original product, and the company (by share price) hadn't change in value in 3 years.

My interpretation then and in hindsight - the shares went too far, too fast in 2013/14. And it took another 3ish years for the company value to catch up with its share price valuation. Then once it caught up, it didn't budge for another 2 years (spring being wound) before finally breaking out more recently ($400 to $3000 in pre-split $, with a high of $4500 in Jan/Feb).

I see the current situation as completely analogous and expect a very similar sequence. I don't know if its 6 months or 6 years or something in the middle. The core belief on my part is that the financials and existing execution doesn't (short term) support a significant move upwards.

I don't know what the new trading range will be. I think there's some evidence for 560/620, but its going to need a lot more than a couple of months to figure out what it will be.

This is Tesla, not just another tech company.

The culture made by Elon will go on, it’s in their DNA.
I have worked for an engineering company that lots its engineering roots (MHO) and made the transition at least temporarily to financial management. Completely agree that the cultural DNA will keep the engineering culture going for awhile (which could easily be a decade or more); the company is not immune though to losing that engineering culture.

I guess we stay at 600 until we get the blowout Q2 delivery info and Elon tells us that Q3 is all but sold out already.
I find that I wear two hats these days. My long term investing hat with the 10+ year investing horizon is expecting pretty much exactly what you've described. Great delivery and production results, great future demand, etc.. My interpretation being that the long term execution is right on track. Great news!

But the short term hat doesn't see any news in the last 3 months, and is not expecting any news in the next 3 months that will move the needle in the short term. There could be a buy the rumor, sell the news type of reaction, but I don't see any new source of buyers that keep buying as the shares go up through 650, 700, 750, .. -- I don't see that.

Effectively the company needs to grow into its current valuation. I don't see a spring being wound (at least not in preparation for another explosive move up). I see an already released spring that is being reset for the next release.


For a big move up in the shares we need a big supply of new buyers that will keep buying as the shares go up. The sources for this supply of new buyers I see are:
- FSD / automated driving progress. Big progress, partly measured by broad distribution of the software to the fleet (and lots of youtube videos showing people being wowed). It needs to be big enough news, with evidence, that new buyers of the stock have line-of-sight to the autonomous business model coming into existence.

My current view on this - we're slipping from previous prognostications about when we'd see this progress. Announcements like them dropping radar from 3/Y and rewrites of the software for new functionality - wonderful for the long term view, but shorter term - I think that the FSD / autonomous functionality is in the middle of a 1 year slip. Thus I expect nothing this year that will move the needle (while hoping to be wrong).

- Financial metrics driven buyers - people that put the financial results / metrics at the center of their investing decisions. For many of these buyers the financial don't yet support an investment.

Improving financials covers a big range of stuff for me. CT, Semi, battery chemistry / form factor / cost to manufacture, quarterly production, evidence that production is approximately 100% sold each quarter, new site builds, etc.. All of this stuff contributes directly to volume, which contributes to revenue, which builds into profits. The big financials evidence we need (MHO):
-- evidence that there is significant leverage. Revenue going up fast, while SG&A goes up slowly. Profit leverage.
-- big absolute and P/E profitability results. Eventually growing so large that, like Apple and their gargantuan quarterly profits, will arrive for Tesla. Somewhere in there the P/E and growth rates will become so large that we won't need a story driven investment hypothesis to find buyers of the shares.
 
I agree. What makes Tesla unique in their respective industries is that the big decisions are presented and lobbied by the creators. The designers, engineers, production specialists, etc. And the physics and engineer CEO pulls the trigger.
I think this is an open question as to how EM will relinquish control. SpaceX may be a roadmap but as a private company our visibility is poor.