Or could use electricity to generate the hydrogen. True, efficiency sucks in the hydrolysis process, but let's assume it was the same. After all, would average people know this? In that scenario, the argument of where the electricity comes from is equivalent for both electric and hydrogen. Leaving out key points, public might believe it. Furthermore, it produces Oxygen to create a whole new market for seniors or even SpaceX!Steam reformation. Uses natural gas and releases ~10 tons of CO2 for every ton of hydrogen produced.
But don’t worry, they’ll sequester it.
Don't worry, I saw the size of the building for just one filling station (along with the explosion video in the past). But do you think they would spin it as clean with faster fillups (assuming no lines) by hiding the true sources of 90% natural gas and maybe 10% electricity? Like clean coal, or Exxon's "research" in sustainable energy.
Just trying to figure out why anyone would invest there. How would this slow down Tesla? I don't even see the political gain, oh wait...