JusRelax
Active Member
Hmmmm. $215 price target on TSLA, and bank rated largest financiers of fossil fuels by far. Do you think they would be likely to manipulate tesla news to drop tsla sp?
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
Hmmmm. $215 price target on TSLA, and bank rated largest financiers of fossil fuels by far. Do you think they would be likely to manipulate tesla news to drop tsla sp?
Elon’s spreading the love
I am more than happy to provide you with a gold-plated engraved invitation to join Reddit or Twitter or some other mindless snarkgroup chatgroup chitterchittertrash group, just as long as you leave here and take with you any who do not know the difference between constructive writing and repeating - even once - moronic jibberjabber of something you read on one of those platforms. Don't you even try to claim that deleted post had any usefulness here. Not. One. Bit.
AND - to every one: ad hominem works both ways. Do you know what "Homer also nods" means? And Homer didn't even have access to Adderall.
It's essentially a non-exchange traded long-term call option, that is usually issued along side another instrument such as a bond or preferred stock.
In this case JPM is claiming that the warrant expired out of the money and worthless in mid-2021, because of the 2018 hullabaloo around Elon's "funding secured" tweet.
IMO, it seems to be a bit of a stretch for JPM to claim that the reason the TSLA share price in mid-2021 was still benearth the warrant strike price was due to a 2018 tweet from Elon.
Wrong bill. This is the infrastructure bill that was signed today.
Tax credit is in the BBB Act, which is still being negotiated. Stay tuned...
MTL_HABS1909
Active Member
Exactly what price did they think it would be at in June and July of this year? It was in the $600s, or over $3,000 in pre split price.
Yeah, like they thought it would be that high with their price targets... Good luck on this, the case will go nowhere, it is just an attempt at extortion. And we know what Elon thinks of that...
Last edited:
Indeed. However on the off chance that JPM wins, it wouldn't surpricse me if Elon pays the $162 million himself with a small portion of the cash he has been receiving from selling shares.
Maybe they should sue themselves for their $215 price target bringing down the share price.
If the price was more than their target, do they have any right to complain?
RobDickinson
Active Member
Its 0.05% of his worth but he wont hand it over if he things JPM are wrong.
JusRelax
Active Member
RobDickinson
Active Member
Sells near a million shares, ends the day with 1.1m more shares lol
Zhelko Dimic
Careful bull
Rational seems way stretched, but someone's bonus may depend on it, so that's how this decision was made.
It's sad that I'm not even joking...
hacer
Active Member
Sure, but if they have a "reasonable price" then they won't have Tesla's margins. So the point stands: the upstarts are way over valued.
So 40-45% of the way through. Hopefully not a repeats of last Tuesday tomorrow!
When I look at threats to Tesla, increasing the OSHA penalties by a factor of 10, which are sometimes selectively enforced, seems like a threat to Tesla or Tesla suppliers - legs [Edit: like the CYBER TRUCK stainless steel supplier]: ( https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-117hr5376rh/pdf/BILLS-117hr5376rh.pdf )
Last edited by a moderator:
Good point! "Funding secured" hurt me so badly as a shareholder, I'm still nursing my wounds...with 30 year old scotch!
[/QUOTE
I bought on “funding secured” at $380, expecting to be sold out at $420. Split adjusted shares at $76 now at $1000.
if an "investor" (not you )Maybe read the post I wrote right after that?
Not every investor is in the same position and has the financial ability to just wait out volatility that the CEO himself created
Just because you're in a great position financially doesn't mean others are and I quite frankly get annoyed at that attitude.
cant wait out volatility ... then "said investor" should not be investing in stocks... in fact if "said investor" can't afford to lose all their initial investment "said investor" should not be investing in individual stocksSimilar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
