J
jbcarioca
Guest
I...
China...we have different views. The min Tesla and GM bring a huge bag of cash out of China you let me know. Until then I'd chalk China up as uniquely difficult. It works today because they take the "profits" and purchase other manufactured products they export out. All fun and good but if you can't take cash out to me those aren't "profits". Further, if I had influence I'd prohibit booking "profits" that are constrained by national borders, this would not be a popular view with either Tesla or GM.
I'm a bit distressed to disagree with you. Thus I will try to explain why you position is incorrect factually.
t's "different views" only because you're ignoring exports. Tesla is making Euro, Shekel, Dirham, Sterling, Kronor, S$, US$ and C$ from China exports.
Beyond that several other OEMs are making cash money from China on similar terms. This thread does need to understand that investments in China are not a one-way-street. TSLA investors are generating large value from Tesla investments there.
We all really need to understand the difference between political positions and economic ones. Tesla has made economic decisions that benefit all of us.
What's more it is just beginning. Once the designed-in-China vehicle/platform arrives there will be large scale exports and production, undoubtedly in more difficult places that tend towards much smaller cheaper models such as India, Mercosur, SE Asia; these things will benefit from China exports and technology transfer.
At present it is difficult to value the cash generated from Tesla Chinese exports, but for 2022 or 2023 we probably will have sufficient details to assess the direct impact.
"..It works today because they take the "profits" and purchase other manufactured products they export out. All fun and good but if you can't take cash out to me those aren't "profits"." This statement is actually contracting itself. For millennia people have sold things to one place and received payment via barter. This practice does absolutely transfer value. In modern times trade subject to exchange controls has regularly used a modern form of barter. There are endless varieties. The present day Chinese trade and investment is fairly open compared to much of the world. FWIW, generic boring terms for this are transfer pricing and trade finance.
Anybody working in trade finance is quite adept at structuring such arrangements. Compared with much of the world the Chinese transfer pricing limitations are trivial.
As always in such business the fine print rules!
NOTE: I loved my years doing this kind of business, especially when the deal was composed of multiple countries and products.