510 nanometers
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
Wow. That should skew O'Dowd's precise calculations.
Patiently waiting for upgrade from 10.8.1 Beta... needs help in spots.
Meanwhile, Max is looking to focus on 1050 I think.
MTL_HABS1909
Active Member
We’re used to seeing the SP drop on good numbers, but the strength TSLA is showing today is starting to make me believe this ER may be different. No one wants to sell knowing just how huge this beat is going to be 
10 yr yield at 2 yr high 1.847% - The macros are showing it some, but TSLA fairs well despite.
Dowd lies about not having a commercial interest
in hurting tesla.
Hope tesla goes after him and The NY Times with
a massive law suit. It is time to set an example.
in hurting tesla.
Hope tesla goes after him and The NY Times with
a massive law suit. It is time to set an example.
TheTalkingMule
Distributed Energy Enthusiast
People have been saying that since 2013 and things seem to be going pretty ok. I think we stick with the same strategy, just innovate and execute.
Maybe write the PR department an email?
Absolutely. Anything the market makers are holding would be fully hedged with the expectation that these ditm calls will be taken delivery on or rolled, or otherwise hedged out.
The spotgamma thesis is that they will be sold leading to a big liquidation event, which I think is pretty unlikely based on what transpired last year.
Not entirely accurate, in China teslas has gone after those maligning tesla
with the intent of hurting them. Setting an example may deter, as
it increases the cost of doing so.
Right. People just randomly drop 250k for an ad plus however much else they spent watching Youtube videos.
This guy must have done a cost benefit analysis before investing $250,000 on the ad.
He expects to gain substantially if he maligns tesla. He is not doing this for the benefit
of humanity.
Go to the 8:50 mark........clearly those are Austin made Model Y's right there and it's possible these are actual production here. No tags/temp license plates
Last edited:
TheTalkingMule
Distributed Energy Enthusiast
Given historical events, I would wager these guys don't sit around responsibly hedged/liquid just waiting to pay out all their contracts. I don't know what's legally required(ha! #seclol), but I assume they push it to the limit and circumvent the "requirements" as much as possible. Even with the clear as day signaling, I bet we see a scramble for shares at some point.
MODERATOR INPUT:
Yes. This post not only has good ideas, but "...relaying every Twitter post..." is a requisite I have mandated several times. So - using a reply to @MartinAustin's post to reiterate: NO ONE is to bring to this thread or to this forum ANY Tweet without providing a cogent set of reasons as to why it is appropriate for this Investors' Sector....Concomitantly, just as heinous is not having accurately determined that such a Tweet....newspaper/blog/whatever reference already has or has not made its presence here.
4 hr later correction: in case anyone wondered what "sing" was about, it has been corrected.....
Last edited:
FEERSUMENDJIN
Member
ISTR from Linux/Unix/SCO wars of yore that there is something called the Lanham Act which can be disastrously expensive if one gets caught trying to impede a competitor by falsehood. Dowd does seem to fit that bill, IMO.
But I may be wrong, as always. IANAL, etc. DW TLA FTW.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
