More generally, it's a V2L capability. V2H has been mentioned a lot, but it has other utility for work or play.
Or just get an inverter and hook it up to the cars 12 volt. That's what I do. But there's a whole other thread for that.
Seemingly wall street has the mental capacity of a 5 year old. It cant retain knowledge, and just stares what what is in front of it.
I assume there is a pause until actual deliveries begin at either Berlin or Austin - then it will be a go on letting the stock run up. I like feeling that selling covered calls is very dangerous
Arkk is getting hammered today due to Paypal which affects all e-commerce/fintech stocks. However Arkk may establish a higher low today. We will see Paypal and the sector recover on the 3rd day post earnings.
Ok if you don't want to acknowledge the difference between a forward p/e of 200 to 150 to 90 to 60 to 50 then laugh
These are valid points. Though I don't expect this to happen with Tesla, I am old enough to remember AAPL trading at ~10 PE, ( probably after adjusting for cash on balance sheet) with gangbusters growth. Might have been right after jobs, but can't remember exactly.Ok if you don't want to acknowledge the difference between a forward p/e of 90 or 60 or 40 then laugh
Doesn't change the fact that the vast majority of the p/e compression has already happened and that there's little room to compress anymore. Whether that means a forward p/e of 90 or 60 or 50 is most it can compress, we don't know. But it doesn't change the fact that we're getting close to a breaking point where the stock is forced higher based on that metric simply because of how much Tesla is growing earnings quarter over quarter.
"A spokeswoman said the time and place of mass production haven't been decided yet." Panasonic's plan to mass produce 4680's is a down-the-road thing.Tying up Battery supply
Panasonic Says Tesla Will Get Top Priority in Supply of 4680 Batteries
By Yang Jie TOKYO--Panasonic Corp., a battery supplier to electric-vehicle maker Tesla Inc., said it expected to start trial production this year of a new,...www.marketwatch.com
After the financial crisis, Apple seems to be trading at 10-15 PE even with YOY growth above 50% from 2009-2011. So this is what a bear market can look like. Apple's PE normally are not above 30 looking between 2006-2022. Out of those 16 years, it spent 3 years with a PE over 30, and 10+ years with a PE under 20. Operating margins were above 25% during most of this time period.
Apple's growth has been very nice and steady, but I'd hardly say "gangbusters" or explosive. Apple's TTM EPS in 2012 was around $1.50. In 2019, it was just below $3 EPS. That's 100% TTM growth over a 7 year period. It has gone gangbusters since........but Apple's P/E went up as well. Meanwhile, Tesla's TTM EPS was negative $3 EPS in 2018 and is positive $3 EPS now on TTM basis. That's gangbusters growth.
The vast majority of those 10+ years of a PE under 20 is when growth slowed way down. If you take the average between 2012 and 2019, growth was in the low teens for Apple. Still good growth, but nothing like Tesla has been doing or will be doing in the coming years.
Well their PE was at their lowest when their yoy growth was at their highest. In a high unemployment era post financial crisis, people were not exactly assigning high PEs to stocks even with crazy growth, and that growth was sustained for 2 years before dropping.
Yes.......during a once in a decade type event which was the financial/housing crisis.........unless you believe we're in once in a decade event right now, then it's not a valid comparison.
