Sure, just trade for a couple of lots of TSLA and we’re brothers.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
It would not go to all shareholders, it would go to shareholders who prove they were harmed by the price action outlined in the SEC document I posted on the previous page. And that could include people with short positions who were cleaned out by the spike in price following Elon’s tweets.
This stuff is neither simple or straightforward
Bribery and corruption in the automotive industry - the unholy alliance between auto companies and auto reviewers/journalists
Elon is not a different person.
He is the best engineer probably alive right now.
the most hard working engineer by far.
his companies are the most cash-environmental efficient way to invest and change the world.
I don’t care whatever he tweets. But he is smart enough that he can compute the plus and minuses of comparing a somewhat unpopular prime minister decision to the worst human being to have ever walked the planet will illicit vivid reactions from the descendants of the people who survived through the atrocities of that person.
I invest my money where I think the person in charge will take the most intelligent decision for every scenario he is confronted to with the knowledge he had at the moment. That is exactly what he said to Ashlee Vance and in multiple interviews.
He showed he had good judgment when he deleted it. I’m sure he was able to anticipate the backlash with the information he had before posting and didn’t have to take that decision after.
Last edited:
how about some good news? let's keep our eyes on the prize
Don't worry it gives US truckers an extra day to organize a protest before the market opensHow could you say such a divisive thing? I'm offended you would bring up a day meant to celebrate slave-owners! You are setting back the mission by openly supporting racism! Don't you know there are some things you simply shouldn't say?
/s
@Krugerrand , what you call 'anger' i call strength. just trying to ensure people can express a different opinion, and not be silenced by those prolific posters with the 'accept it all, or move on dichotomy, that pushes us steps closer to an infinite echo-chamber this place has inched closer to over the years.
and if per chance it be anger? rather be angry over bullying than the bullier.
and if per chance it be anger? rather be angry over bullying than the bullier.
Last edited:
Helpful. To quote the comment...
My question still remains about whether it opens up sources of supply as well.
thesmokingman
Active Member
Russia has no where to go, no end game, nothing to gain and everything to lose. In other words they be bluffing, but I guess it's hard to "CALL" them on it...
A reminder that a Russian-Ukraine conflict will possibly make the semiconductor shortage worse, due to the amount of raw inputs (industrial gasses, palladium etc) for production that Ukraine & Russia supply.
fortune.com
The chips shortage crippled parts of the world economy. A Russian invasion of Ukraine would make it even worse
The two potential combatants are leading producers of key components for computer chip manufacturing
Well Russia stands to gain all of Ukraine itself, which is an extraordinary prize and in the mind of Putin probably worth some economic sanctions (and he knows NATO isn’t going to take any military action to stop it).
No, no and no, we’re not going to analyse the Russia-Ukraine conflict for the fifth time this month, no matter how enticing.
Shorts are not investors. They are the exact opposite. Anti-investors.
Yeah I highly doubt that shorts would be compensated through this scheme although the tweet could be construed as a way to clean out the shorts by spreading disinformation to boost the price, they would likely need to pursue separate litigation. Just throwing it out there.
Shorts are not necessarily "anti-investors" though considering that sophisticated investors are often hedged with holdings consisting of short and long positions to mitigate risks. But a setup like that would probably also not qualify for compensation here. The short firms who do a lot of research etc would probably argue they're trying to protect investors from fraud and whatever else.
This stuff is not simple at all and the details matter big time
Yes. And acquired on the open market, obviously. Must keep up the appearance, right?
Drumheller
Active Member
Have a great weekend, everyone! It's ok for us to disconnect from the online world for a while.
insaneoctane
Well-Known Member
Just a question for the EE/firmware types....
How much of a liability is Tesla creating for themselves with their novel chip shortage solutions? ...by rewriting code to work with whatever chips they can actually procure vs previously spec'd chips? And by liability, I mean expanding the number of hardware combinations and complexity (and thus quality) of firmware to handle all the combinations? I'm already dizzy thinking of the hardware compatibility vs firmware effort just because Tesla is constantly revising so many components of their vehicles, this chip shortage solution seams like insult to injury. In my head you multiply the number of car models * number of hardware combos of that model and every new firmware somehow has to quality check against all those permutations. Head officially hurts. Am I overreacting?
How much of a liability is Tesla creating for themselves with their novel chip shortage solutions? ...by rewriting code to work with whatever chips they can actually procure vs previously spec'd chips? And by liability, I mean expanding the number of hardware combinations and complexity (and thus quality) of firmware to handle all the combinations? I'm already dizzy thinking of the hardware compatibility vs firmware effort just because Tesla is constantly revising so many components of their vehicles, this chip shortage solution seams like insult to injury. In my head you multiply the number of car models * number of hardware combos of that model and every new firmware somehow has to quality check against all those permutations. Head officially hurts. Am I overreacting?
Drumheller
Active Member
From a software dev point of view, it won't be terrible if they have an abstraction layer. The layer can handle standard calls from the higher level software and relay it to that chip's specific hardware calls. That's a simplification of the situation but the concept will make maintenance easier over time. It still adds some complexity as compared to only one hardware but it's manageable.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
