You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zach is a smart guy. While I agree with your post I also think we should be open to the possibility that Tesla sold some or all of it’s BTC. Reason could be as simple as “We expected BTC to be an inflation hedge…”I hate to bring this up but its been a year and BTC has proven to be the complete opposite of an inflation hedge. At this point I am starting to question management’s decision to hold on to it. It has done nothing but hurt shareholders.
congrats for him. Now he can find out what the real truth is behind the saying that the first million is hard and the later millions are easy: it is the same million over and over again!As a counter to this, my dad became a Teslanaire for the first time today,
The problem with Wal Mart is it’s low/no/ negative growth. Last year it made $13b in profit, the year before that it made $14b and a decade ago it made $17b, yet it trades at over 30x earnings, a 50% premium to the market as a whole at ~20. It’s revenue growth is also below inflation.Well technically PE is about earnings, and has nothing to do with actual dividends Paid out. At a PE of 30x, the “earnings yield” is 3.33%.
Are you kidding me?! All I see is panic. I'm panicking. My investment is only up 15x in 3 years and I don't know what to do with myself!I'm not seeing any widespread panic here yet. When we have bottomed out previously, it's generally been in a forum-wide haze of terror.
Here's the Tesla response. Please point out, in a different thread, where they say Bitcoin is a hedge.Tesla management has said it, most recently in its response to Karen’s shareholder proposal.
#KarenWasRight
BTC did increase more than inflation at the time of the Tesla filing. Further, until Tuesday, BTC was still 10% or more higher that Tesla's recorded impairment level (ignoring gains already taken).In seeking to dictate the manner and timing of the liquidation of certain of the Company’s assets, the Proposal implicates both of the central considerations identified in the 1998 Release. Determining where, how and when a company makes investments is fundamental to management’s ability to oversee a company’s financial condition. These decisions involve a wide array of business considerations, both on a micro- and macro-level. To choose just one example: in the supporting statement to the Proposal, the Proponent notes the stable inflation rate. However, since the Company’s receipt of the Proposal, inflation reached 7% in the U.S., the highest level in 39 years. The ability of management to react to changing market conditions, such as inflation, through the diversification of its currency portfolio is fundamental to its ability to run the Company on a day-to-day basis and is not appropriate for direct shareholder oversight. Further, the management of investments is complex and involves the consideration of many factors. Shareholders cannot possibly make an informed judgment about these factors, given that they are not involved in the day-to-day management of the Company. In addition, a requirement to sell investments according to a fixed schedule hampers the flexibility needed by management to align its investment and cash management strategy with then-current market conditions. The pre-determined, granular schedule imposed by the Proposal, including the requirement to liquidate certain assets of the Company within five business days, is an inappropriate limitation on the discretion of the board of directors and management of the Company in managing the financial condition of the Company.
I wonder what @The Accountant thinks.
Crypto has always followed the stock market at a higher beta. Who in their right mind thinks it's a hedge for anything?
I thought there was supposed to be some support level theory in technical analysis. But from what I see it is going down and down and down and down. 5 straight weeks of red for S&P500, the same for great companies. ARK dumping TSLA to buy GM, are people out of their minds. Seems like nobody has looked at the Q2 earnings which were the best numbers in history. This dissociation between the stock market and the company health is surprising.
Tesla is trading at ~29x likely 2023 earnings and ~19x likely 2024 earnings.
See institutional investors are looking for a lower beta as a company matures so they can see it as a less risky investment with good growth. Elon was like..instead of dividends, share buy backs, and using our cash to invest into mining or whatever, let me blow up beta some more by going into crypto. This made it so only risk takers would invest into Tesla while conservative investors stay away.View attachment 803230
I am a patient guy. Its been over a year and this move has not paid off for Tesla or us. Do we have to watch it go down in flame? At some point you would think that they had noticed the negative impact it had on the stock price.
If RIVN is really going to get a bounce off those horrible earning you would think it would leak into the BEV companies…. But this has nothing to do with fundamentals. This is wholesale liquidation and margin calls. Think we are close to a real capitulation and short term bottom. Then it is up to data and whether or not the FED plans to hike another 500 basis points into 2023. None of which I think is happening. Markets like these make people understand the value of cash sitting in an account getting half a point interest. Those six month emergency funds can go a long way sometimes…
Pro tip: Set your buy order for 421 - could execute before it rebounds above the buy-wall at 420.69Sorry I know you're not fear mongering, but that's fear mongering lol. ...