Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
I believe that directly supporting a Chinese company is worse than indirectly supporting one. And to continue that logic, then everything we as Americans winds up supporting the GOP as well. So someone selling their Tesla doesn't make sense.
Maybe my take differs as I'm British. As an international observer, I can envision the possibility of the US becoming as great, or even a greater threat to the world as you probably deem the CCP to be. Dependent on how your political situation evolves over time, but the last few years of US politics have shown we can't take anything for granted. Anyway, I'll shut up now, as don't want to upset the mods!
 
UK Supercharger congestion has started, but the i3 owner is paying £0.61 / $0.76 per kWh (or lower if subscribing monthly)

1 out of 8 (soon 16) stalls in use. Anyone want to plug this into s spreadsheet model? Could Supercharger income become important?

1652967791398.png
 
They want Tesla to pledge future profits to buy backs, hence leaving the war chest untouched.
So the only difference between Tesla actually buying back the shares vs. this suggested share buy back would be that they want Tesla to buy back the shares by kicking the payment can down the road -as if that's any better??!??

(Edit - thank you @traxila , @elasalle , @ZachF , and others for the much appreciated, patient replies.)
 
Last edited:
So the only difference between Tesla actually buying back the shares vs. this suggested share buy back would be that they want Tesla to buy back the shares by kicking the payment can down the road -as if that's any better??!??

Past few quarters, Tesla has been paying back it's debt and is now with almost zero debt. So they could take similar amounts and do buybacks each quarter with FCF.

However, Q2 really needs help due to macros - so they could do the Q2 buyback with actual cash and not FCF. No new GF's etc coming online - so cash is just sitting there idle. Also maybe just $2-3B worth of shares, which can then be used to increase the pool for stock based compensation as employee head count is growing.

Tesla has survived with a single factory, 1 model at low production and almost no cash many times.
 
Coincidentally, 620 is also on a support trendline that has extended from the Day 0 post-split peak.

We can also go all the way down to 500 which is the weekly EMA 200 which couldn't be broken even by the mighty COVID crash.

I know many members are not as enthusiastic about technicals but they have worked for me and enabled me to buy more shares that I wouldn't have otherwise been able to afford.
View attachment 806090
To expand a little bit:

In late 2018, the Fed came to the rescue as SPY reached the -20% mark, officially entering bear market status.
We are at that point again but instead of an accommodating Fed, we have a complete opposite. It is only natural to expect SPY to extend further to the downside. Many are expecting SPY 370-350 which should pull TSLA down to the 620 level. I don't know what it would take to see 500 and it's probably too late, but please manage your margin.
 
So the only difference between Tesla actually buying back the shares vs. this suggested share buy back would be that they want Tesla to buy back the shares by kicking the payment can down the road -as if that's any better??!??

(Edit - thank you for the much appreciated, patient replies.)
They want Tesla to buy back shares as the profits roll in. They can’t buy back shares on credit. I mean I guess they could use a margin account but that sounds like a disastrously bad idea.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: mongo and UncaNed
So the only difference between Tesla actually buying back the shares vs. this suggested share buy back would be that they want Tesla to buy back the shares by kicking the payment can down the road -as if that's any better??!??

(Edit - thank you for the much appreciated, patient replies.)
To be clear, I'm only discussing, not advocating for the buy back position, i.e. I have no 'want'.

Using future free cash flow to purchsse TSLA would not reduce the cash on hand from present levels. They could even only allocate a portion of FCF to purchases so their cash would still grow. If they hold the shares instead of removing them from circulation they can always sell them for cash later.
If the most recent cap raise ends up being made superfluous by company performance, then a share reducing buyback reverses that action (potentially at a profit).