Can you please elaborate? Why is that number significant and why do you think this is just shorts covering?A break through 720 could really set off a gamma squeeze... there is already a lot of coverage happening, that'll accelerate it.
Thanks
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you please elaborate? Why is that number significant and why do you think this is just shorts covering?A break through 720 could really set off a gamma squeeze... there is already a lot of coverage happening, that'll accelerate it.
Today, with the current climate, this is mostly true.Anybody that seriously discussed indoor farming for anything other than consumer preference high value shifting has never farmed. Indoor farming is terrible for the environment from beginning to end. Horrible. IT is al ESG greenwashing. ALL.
It is such greenwashing that the mars project even admitted that and said vertical farming, even on mars, made no sense and it was better to try to replicate the advantage of large fields. On freaking mars.
My brief skim therefore stopped when I saw that sub heading and trashed the whole thing as it immediately lost credibility.
I didn't get greedy and didn't have any change in the couch.610 here , close though…
Edit... Told wife that I will calculate the loss from my $10-greediness in 2032 - it will be significant! I will add before we get there I am sure…
He doesn’t have a flight attendant masseuse anymore. Too soon?Is it me, or does it look like Elon is suffering form lower back pain??
A break through 720 could really set off a gamma squeeze... there is already a lot of coverage happening, that'll accelerate it.
He has tweeted about lower back pain before...He doesn’t have a flight attendant masseuse anymore. Too soon?
Knock on wood.I'm very sad about today's higher stock price.
It means I will never be able to buy another share at $694.20.
I call this Elon Time. Prognostications, and he has many, on when stuff will be done in the short term / tactical items, are frequently late. Even legendary in their lateness. So consistently late that I personally prefer that he'd stick to "shipping next week" type of prognostications for when something will happen. But he won't - he's Elon and he's a package deal."At SpaceX we specialize in converting things from 'impossible' to 'late'." - Elon Musk
Can someone expand on what that means? Initially everyone thinks it is impossible. but here at SpaceX we make it possible but it happens much later than our initial timelines - is that what he meant?
Might buy a few far OTM debit call spreads here to help add some fuel. Funny how cheap TSLA can still be after +5% and +8% days.A break through 720 could really set off a gamma squeeze... there is already a lot of coverage happening, that'll accelerate it.
I just want a SpaceX T-shirt with that quote on itI call this Elon Time. Prognostications, and he has many, on when stuff will be done in the short term / tactical items, are frequently late. Even legendary in their lateness. So consistently late that I personally prefer that he'd stick to "shipping next week" type of prognostications for when something will happen. But he won't - he's Elon and he's a package deal.
Meanwhile, impossible stuff happens routinely on a long scale timeline.
So you remember these things and apply your own fudge factor to both.
Rocket re-use is the current big example - I expect FSD to be the new big example. Rocket re-use is, of course, impossible. And when SpaceX decided it was important / critical / vital to do the impossible, we were treated to a litany of "any day now"s and a montage of rockets blowing up. And then they stuck the landing, got better at it, and now SpaceX does this so routinely that it barely makes space flight news, much less more commonly available news.
Meanwhile there is 1 other orbit delivery company I know of that has made even 1 attempt at 'landing' (capturing) a spent booster for eventually having a process to reuse said booster. They've made 1 attempt and are now in the phase SpaceX already went through - the montage of landing failures, stuff blowing up, etc.. The rest of the world, including all of the government funded / executed programs, can't do this and aren't in danger of doing this (land orbital class booster).
Rocket re-use was very late on the original timeline. And more than a decade ahead of everybody else. Elon Time. And it happens over and over again.
I don't believe that FSD is anywhere close to enabling autonomous vehicles. I do believe that despite all of Elon's "any day now"s about FSD, I strongly believe that Tesla is the only company working down anything like a path to success. I don't know if it'll be this year for City NOA, next year, or 5 years. All I'm confident of is that Tesla is going to get there first with a more generalized solution, and nearly everybody else hasn't even found the right ballpark to join in the game.
Worth noting - the only serious competition I see to Tesla in this space is Mobileye; Mobileye theoretically has the similar capability to collect fleet level data from cars purchased by consumers, and is not dependent exclusively on company owned and company operated vehicles If I remember right, they are also pursuing both a camera only and camera+radar(+lidar?) solution.
I'd love to see Elon call it Elon Time in an interview sometime
Here is some anecdotal evidence: I used to talk about my Tesla all the time. Now I’m loathe to bring it up because the conversation inevitably dives into politics and matters of civility. The caveat is that the switch to EVs is so massive, incidents like “pedo sub” might not matter. But Elon’s rhetoric is frustrating, because I’m proud of my car and the company and I want my kids to have positive role models, and I want the brand to succeed in the long term.We will never know. Tesla might not even exist in 2022 if Elon had never been on Twitter. In any case, it doesn't look like it's hurt anything.
Hmm, I don't necessarily disagree with your sentiments but it ignores the huge amount of BS Elon had to go thru at every turn. He used his soapbox to push this country and this world towards EVs when everyone laughed at him. Vertical integration, the legacies clowned him for this. Re-usable rockets, lol wut? He broke a lot of eggs along the way to push us here. He's going to break a lot more eggs as he's goes along so if you are hoping that he turns into someone like Tim Cook... not realistic. Elon adheres to first principles so he's going to rub ppl the wrong way because he doesn't neatly fit into any box. It is what it is.Here is some anecdotal evidence: I used to talk about my Tesla all the time. Now I’m loathe to bring it up because the conversation inevitably dives into politics and matters of civility. The caveat is that the switch to EVs is so massive, incidents like “pedo sub” might not matter. But Elon’s rhetoric is frustrating, because I’m proud of my car and the company and I want my kids to have positive role models, and I want the brand to succeed in the long term.
I wouldn't say this is that low of volume compared to the last 5 months of the stock. During the March move up, all days except March 23 were 35m and under. We're looking straight at 36-38m today.Fairly low volume today for such a big move. And even lower this afternoon, hence the pushdown here.
I wonder what happens when and actual buying pressure shows up?
Huge spacex fan here. Huge. That said...no they didn't. It was proven to work in the 60s. That was the inspiration. Blue Origin was racing to the same goal and by all honest measures got to the goal of launch and reuse of a rocket to space (100km) first. Since then...almost nada from Blue Origin and SpaceX is laughing all the way to the bank and has brought starlink to society. Starlink also isn't new, it's just better.Correct. Elon is notorious for saying "just 2 more weeks".
And everyone told him landing a first stage of a rocket was a fools errand. Well, that "fool" is laughing all the way to the bank now.
Starlink 2 ??? Wow, order of magnitude more I/O than starlink 1.Part 2 of Tim Dodd's most recent interview with Elon at Starbase is out:
He has his warts but how about what he's done in Ukraine? How about bringing internet to the World, without Elon we would still all be paying $5 a gallon. I'll take Elon over 99.9% of any politician and hold my head high driving and supporting Tesla.Here is some anecdotal evidence: I used to talk about my Tesla all the time. Now I’m loathe to bring it up because the conversation inevitably dives into politics and matters of civility. The caveat is that the switch to EVs is so massive, incidents like “pedo sub” might not matter. But Elon’s rhetoric is frustrating, because I’m proud of my car and the company and I want my kids to have positive role models, and I want the brand to succeed in the long term.
Huge spacex fan here. Huge. That said...no they didn't. It was proven to work in the 60s. That was the inspiration.