The letter calls on ways for SpaceX to fix its reputation and culture.
www.theverge.com
Translation of the letter:
“Please keep paying me $500k/ year, but STFU on Twitter already!”
If people want to make a genuine statement here talking with their feet is the best and likely only way they will make any real statement. But these people are sacrificing nothing to make this “bold” statement.
Very few people who disagree with their company executive‘s politics are willing to actually make sacrifices to back that disagreement up.
I hear Blue Origin and their entirely safe on Twitter CEO is looking for rocket scientists.
What I want to know is;
1) If HR isn’t doing its job then why aren’t all you letter writers supporting your colleagues in the flesh? Like stand with your colleague and face the harasser. Or all march into HR together and demand action be taken?
2) If Twitter is a distraction to you, umm…don’t go there, don’t follow his tweets, heck, delete your account, then you don’t have to be distracted or embarrassed. The whole idea of being embarrassed because of someone else’s behavior is so begging for you to be told to mind your own business.
FYI, what you just did is an a$$hole move. Welcome to the club.
This is passive aggressive behavior disguised as ‘we just want what’s in the best interest of humanity’. It’s like nobody knows how to be upfront and straight forward and communicate constructively. We have to write an anonymous group letter and leak it to the media. It’s a form of bullying.
Let’s be clear, I don’t care what it is or what you do, just don’t pretend it’s something other than it is or you’re somehow above others by your passive aggressive actions.
That’s fair.
SpaceX and Tesla are run on the backs of these engineers. They are choosing to keep working at SpaceX (for obvious reasons) even though they are likely highly employable in their respective fields.
Writing letters accomplishes absolutely nothing. It gives the haters something to write about in their hate-media. Musk doesn’t care about letters from what is very likely a minority of employees. Unless the engineers start leaving the company and making noise about why they are leaving the company, there will be no changes.
But my bigger point isn’t that these people should STFU, it’s that their letter is pointless if they won’t back it with actions.
I stopped adding further comments regarding this, as the topic as well as the posts on same suffice to demonstrate one of the two major reasons I have so implacably denigrated Twitter since its inception. The platform
addicts one to throwing out for all to see one’s stream of consciousness and that, unfortunately for those of us who are human beings, shows the worst of us. Do NOT try to justify that with a “it shows the best of us, too, so it evens out” or “Well, that’s him. You have the choice of taking all of him or none.”, as junior high sophistry is not at work here.
Now let’s go to the workplace and consider an employee. It doesn’t matter who it is. Jejune sewage out for all the world to see on Twitter means any or all of the following, and likely far more, to that employee: “If the boss can speak that way for all the world to see, then so can I.” “If the boss can speak that way for all the world to see, then my grandmother will learn of it, too.” “If the boss can speak that way on Twitter, why would he not also so speak here…in the lunchroom…behind my back…in front of my face…in front of coworker X’s face, who, while brilliant, has problems and may be the sort to file a harassment lawsuit, potentially endangering some or all of our jobs and certainly giving this company that I love a harder time of it than it has already?”
Now let’s turn to Twitter as a necessary platform for the dispersal of some positive or necessary material. Making that claim is unbridled horse patooty. An effective way is for Tesla, or SpaceX, or The Boring Co., or “Musk Enterprises” to create either a blog or a corporate newsletter. “That’s so 2000s!” or so, you reply. SO WHAT? It doesn’t matter. It not only is effective at reaching all who WANT to learn about one or all of the companies, it would force its author to stick to the point, to stay focused; he would be able just as now to choose which posed questions to answer - just as undemocratically as it is now, where a number of favorites get limelighted, but in this situation would correctly be Anonymous Questioner.
Swim in a cesspool, and you’ll stink. Musk should get out, now, and stay out.