-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
The Accountant
Active Member
This is interesting too.
A swarm of Cruise robotaxis blocked San Francisco traffic for hours
The GM subsidiary launched its commercial robotaxi service earlier in June.www.engadget.com
Mary led!
Ouch
View attachment 823433
Tesla loses about 20% of it's Q1 number in Q2 due to Shanghai lockdown and we fret about it all quarter.
GM loses about 20% of it's Q1 number in Q2 and they drop it on shareholders the day after the quarter ends.
The pain and suffering we must endure
Gm now up 2.8% on the news… oh well lol
Tesla loses about 20% of it's Q1 number due to Shanghai lockdown and we fret about it all quarter.
GM loses about 20% of it's Q1 number and they drop it on shareholders the day after the quarter ends.
The pain and suffering we must endure.
Advantage of spinning the news!
And no cnbs headlines yetTesla loses about 20% of it's Q1 number in Q2 due to Shanghai lockdown and we fret about it all quarter.
GM loses about 20% of it's Q1 number in Q2 and they drop it on shareholders the day after the quarter ends.
The pain and suffering we must endure
… stock is up 2.7%
JRP3
Hyperactive Member
Corporate profits have contributed disproportionately to inflation. How should policymakers respond?
The inflation spike of 2021 and 2022 has presented real policy challenges. In order to better understand this policy debate, it is imperative to look at prices and how they are being affected. The price of just about everything in the U.S. economy can be broken down into the three main...
www.epi.org
JRP3
Hyperactive Member
Did she record it underwater?
265k will be the reported consensus when the numbers come out.
Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
Phil Labeau, CNBC. He provided an update that it is because GM is coming in 95k vehicles short this quarter due to chip shortages, but that they are reaffirming full year guidance. And of course CNBC's banner simply says "GM reaffirms full year guidance".
General Motors reports roughly 95,000 vehicles made without certain components | CNBC on Youtube
JRP3
Hyperactive Member
I'm 20 minutes in and haven't heard anything we haven't heard before.
Did she record it underwater?
California, you never surprise me. Killing a nascent lithium extraction industry before it even really got going. In the name of the environment too. Somehow it’s better to import lithium from China. “Lithium tax” gets approved in California amid critics’ opposition
Update: read wtlloyd's article below for more context. Seems OK in the end, the tax is minor.
Update: read wtlloyd's article below for more context. Seems OK in the end, the tax is minor.
Last edited:
PSA, for anyone who is new-ish to this type of journalism...nearly all are paid marketing articles. For those of us who've been here awhile, it is par for the course and it will continue until the competitors (ICE and oil mainly) have no marketing money left.
Hasten back 10 years to the Model S launch and you could have read this exact article, but it might be titled "The competition is coming". In 10 years, what competition has actually arrived? Q2 Tesla should breach 80% US BEV market share, Q3 could breach 90% with Austin ramping and more Fremont cars staying in the states due to increased output from Berlin and Shanghai. There is simply no car that can compete, but I hope one comes along one day as it is good for the mission.
I didn't read this, as others have, to spare the rest of us the hardship, however, if this article is just forecasting an opinion, that is spun to sound like fact, than it is exactly what I expect it to be.
These 'journalists' get even more money to make *sugar* up and/or miss facts (cherry pick data), then spin an outcome based on that. This is the FUD that deserves to be broken down and brought into the light. Case in point from 2013 was Broder (who didn't realize how much detailed data Tesla could get from his drive in real time), but he is now a NYT senior editor who has sat comfortably on the editorial board since 2018.
And, yes, Broder's article is STILL on the NYT website.
When the 10yr rate was approaching 3%, TSLA, and other growth stocks, were getting hammered because of a belief that growth stocks are bad because of reasons. Now that the rate is retreating well below 3%, why aren't growth stocks like TSLA soaring? Makes me think those reasons were more voodoo than anything else. It never made sense to me that a stock like TSLA that is growing like crazy would get punished like that just because of a fraction of a percent rise in an interest rate.
The stock market isn’t completely rational. Meaning human emotions of fear and greed get thrown into the mix.
I believe that far more than any attempt at a rational theory about future cash flows or whatever.
This tax is dumb. Pure and simple. California is destroying it's ecological reputation.
Krugerrand
Meow
Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
We now have absolute proof who controls the Market:
Worst part? They're flaunting their power. Will not end well.
Cheers!
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
