Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Been focusing on this for a while.

Optimist going forward:

1) All the retail suckers got cleaned out and can't play anymore so volume has dropped considerably.
2) Smart money is buying it up while institutions and slow movers are waiting for the all clear and when they get it there will be a buying frenzy and new highs.

Pessimist going forward:

1) All the smart money knows this is a bear market and is waiting to hammer it hard when it tops out and the euphoria over the latest bounce dies down. The FED has made it very clear they will remain aggressive until CPI collapses along with labor market which means relentless rate hikes going into the middle of 2023. Look out for post CPI report to sell the news.

We did have consistent low volume elevation off the lows post the great recession that lead to a booming stock market. OTOH. more rate hikes means more beat downs.
I haven't been tracking volume all that closely beyond "its really low". Is the current volume also adjusted for the split (or pre-split volume adjusted)? I'm wondering if the split has brought an additional 2/3rds reduction in volume as measured by value rather than shares.
 
Agreed; big day tomorrow.

I'm in the camp that thinks CPI numbers will come in tame tomorrow, BUT the Fed still clings to .75 increase. Powell is sticking to his guns on doing everything in his power to keep inflation in check, even though there is plenty of data/evidence that indicates we have reached a peak in inflation.

I don't know how the market will react to the above scenario. We are totally agreed that if the number comes in hot, we're in for a mess.
Exactly what I think, too.

In the last interview Powell stated that the biggest learning from the 70ies inflation-cycles was, that the rates got lowered too early. So he wants them high until Inflation comes down, let them stay at that level for longer and make the Job-Market more company-biased (i.e. more jobless claims).

That was the gist from the interview he gave Friday(?)..
 
I haven't been tracking volume all that closely beyond "its really low". Is the current volume also adjusted for the split (or pre-split volume adjusted)? I'm wondering if the split has brought an additional 2/3rds reduction in volume as measured by value rather than shares.
Yes, average volume has been adjusted for the split. Prior to the split, the average was around 30M. Right after the split, the average was 90M. It's been trending down ever since due to lack of volume since the split.

So yes, apples to apples comparison.
 
I haven't been tracking volume all that closely beyond "its really low". Is the current volume also adjusted for the split (or pre-split volume adjusted)? I'm wondering if the split has brought an additional 2/3rds reduction in volume as measured by value rather than shares.
Average volume before split was in the high twenty millions per day.

The average is now listed as 81M. Today we traded 48M. The whole market has had low volumes for a couple of months. AAPL was very high today.
 
Exactly what I think, too.

In the last interview Powell stated that the biggest learning from the 70ies inflation-cycles was, that the rates got lowered too early. So he wants them high until Inflation comes down, let them stay at that level for longer and make the Job-Market more company-biased (i.e. more jobless claims).

That was the gist from the interview he gave Friday(?)..
This is my sense also. A continuing point of emphasis has become the # of job opening compared to the # of job seekers (I assume that these are the numbers in the official unemployed metric). I expect something a lot closer to 1:1 from the 2+:1 that we've got right now.

Until the openings / seekers is a lot more balanced, and maybe even the unemployment rate going back up (5%?) - simply seeing peak inflation isn't going to be enough. Peak inflation is enough to create the illusion inflation is under control, while actually creating an environment for 6-10% inflation to normalize in a backdrop where 2% is the target. The Fed isn't just seeking peak inflation - they are seeking declining inflation, and declining inflation across a range of metrics - not just CPI.
 

Bullish for EVs, bullish for energy storage (I've been chomping at the bit for Tesla to sell Powerwalls a la carte), bullish for TSLA!
Was just coming to post this exact thing.

Pretty huge news when you consider the recent expansion of Tesla’s production. Looking forward to the next earnings call.

Good to see the spring getting wound more from Tesla’s side instead of just more macro nonsense pushing it down.
 
Average volume before split was in the high twenty millions per day.

The average is now listed as 81M. Today we traded 48M. The whole market has had low volumes for a couple of months. AAPL was very high today.
Even though overall volume was low today, it's great to see big green towers at the start and the end of the trading day!
Screenshot_20220912-151015.png
 
Look out Amazon- you're next!
Tesla should already be worth more than Amazon. Tesla will make more profit than Amazon this year. Tesla will make more profit than Amazon next year. Tesla will make more profit than Amazon every year in the foreseeable future. Amazon has negative cash flow while Tesla has strong positive cash flow. Etc.
This inspired me to look into Amazon's financials and other companies valued more than Tesla. I think you're right here.

Amazon compared to Tesla:
  • 2x less revenue compound annual growth rate
  • Gross margin % in low 40s, about equal to where Tesla will be in 2024 with new factories ramped up
  • 2-3x less operating/net margin, and Tesla's lead is widening due to operating leverage increasing
  • Heavy competition in online retail segment and moderate threat from Microsoft Azure in cloud services, vs Tesla being absurdly far ahead of competitors
Here are the rough numbers for Amazon before the recent slowdown in the last year:

Growth
Revenue: 30% per year​
Earnings per share: 80% per year​
Operating Income: 80% per year​
Margins:
Gross: 42%​
Operating: 4 to 6%​

Income:
Gross: $200B​
Operating: $30B​

1663007952164.png

1663015034378.png


Right now my Tesla model for 2023 has deliveries of 2.8M and gross profit per car rising into the low-to-mid $20k range as Tesla improves on both the revenue and cost sides of the equation. Opex will stay under $8B I think. I've recently incorporated the $45/kWh US tax credit for batteries to cost on both cars from Fremont and Austin and also stationary storage, which has a big impact on margins. My thesis hasn't significantly changed from earlier this year other than the US sustainable energy tax advantages being finalized. I'm just trying to estimate the impact of the remaining price rises, mix shift, cost savings, etc.

The combined effect is a profit bonanza of $58B GAAP net income. I almost can't believe it but I derived each number independently of the others as best I could and I've spent months trying to figure out if I've lost my mind yet I keep getting similar results.

So I'm projecting Tesla to crush Amazon on earnings next year in addition to the better growth and margins, but as of today Amazon has a market cap more than 30% higher than Tesla's. How much longer can this last? How much longer until Tesla has the highest market cap?

1663018890161.png


  • Apple makes steady profit with good margins but they're growing slowly. It took them 4 years to double net income from $50B to $100B, and that happened mainly because of a spike in 2020.
1663022985000.png

  • Saudi Aramco is in an industry facing secular decline towards extinction with no hope of long-term salvation, and their products are commodities with wildly variable prices. Tesla's rise will make this reality increasingly obvious over the next few years. It looks like the long-feared Peak Oil quietly happened in 2019 without much fanfare.
1663022756965.png


1663022924005.png


  • Microsoft and Alphabet have similar financials with about $75B annual earnings growing about 40% per year or so. They've both been doubling earnings every 2-3 years. Excellent, but still much slower than Tesla. They also have good margins, but less than where Tesla will be in 2023 according to my projections.

So there really is no one and nothing stopping Tesla from becoming the world's most valuable company within the next two years in my opinion. When Tesla gets to Microsoft and Alphabet level earnings by around 2024 and are still showing growth above 50% per year, it's hard to see Tesla not shooting to #1 at around $3T market cap.

Q1 2022Q2 2022Q3 2022Q4 2022Q1 2023Q2 2023Q3 2023Q4 2023
Vehicle deliveries310,048254,695371,752489,457578,123668,171735,556813,516
Auto Rev excl ZEV creds$ 16,182$ 14,258$ 20,804$ 28,389$ 34,109$ 40,090$ 44,869$ 50,438
Auto CoGS$ (11,322)$ (10,521)$ (14,672)$ (19,073)$ (21,951)$ (25,026)$ (27,159)$ (29,602)
ZEV Credits$ 679$ 344$ 420$ 469$ 469$ 469$ 469$ 469
ZEV cred rev per veh$ 2.2$ 1.4$ 1.1$ 1.0$ 0.8$ 0.7$ 0.6$ 0.6
Auto Gross Profit excl ZEV creds$ 4,860$ 3,737$ 6,131$ 9,315$ 12,158$ 15,064$ 17,710$ 20,836
Avg Rev per Vehicle excl ZEV creds$ 52.2$ 56.0$ 56.0$ 58.0$ 59.0$ 60.0$ 61.0$ 62.0
Avg CoGS per Vehicle$ (36.5)$ (41.3)$ (39.5)$ (39.0)$ (38.0)$ (37.5)$ (36.9)$ (36.4)
Avg Gross Profit per Vehicle excl ZEV creds$ 15.7$ 14.7$ 16.5$ 19.0$ 21.0$ 22.5$ 24.1$ 25.6
Gross Margin excl ZEV creds30.0%26.2%29.5%32.8%35.6%37.6%39.5%41.3%
Auto Rev$ 16,861$ 14,602$ 21,223$ 28,857$ 34,578$ 40,559$ 45,338$ 50,907
Auto Gross Profit$ 5,539$ 4,081$ 6,551$ 9,784$ 12,627$ 15,533$ 18,178$ 21,305
Avg Rev per Veh$ 54.4$ 57.3$ 57.1$ 59.0$ 59.8$ 60.7$ 61.6$ 62.6
Avg Gross Profit per Veh$ 17.9$ 16.0$ 17.6$ 20.0$ 21.8$ 23.2$ 24.7$ 26.2
Auto Gross Margin32.9%27.9%30.9%33.9%36.5%38.3%40.1%41.9%
Research & Development$ (865)$ (667)$ (700)$ (735)$ (772)$ (811)$ (851)$ (894)
Selling, General & Administrative$ (992)$ (961)$ (990)$ (1,020)$ (1,050)$ (1,082)$ (1,114)$ (1,147)
Restructuring & Other$ -$ (142)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -
Total Operating Expenses$ (1,857)$ (1,770)$ (1,690)$ (1,755)$ (1,822)$ (1,892)$ (1,965)$ (2,041)
OpEx as % of Auto Gross Profit34%43%26%18%14%12%11%10%
Energy Generation and Storage Rev$ 616$ 866$ 1,299$ 1,949$ 2,923$ 4,384$ 4,823$ 5,305
Energy Gen and Store Cost$ (688)$ (769)$ (1,077)$ (1,507)$ (2,261)$ (3,391)$ (3,730)$ (4,103)
Energy Gen and Store Gross Profit$ (72)$ 97$ 222$ 441$ 662$ 993$ 1,092$ 1,201
Energy Gen and Store Gross Margin %-12%11%17%23%23%23%23%23%
Services & Other Rev$ 1,279$ 1,466$ 1,616$ 1,766$ 1,916$ 2,066$ 2,216$ 2,366
Services & Other Cost$ (1,286)$ (1,410)$ (1,530)$ (1,650)$ (1,770)$ (1,890)$ (2,010)$ (2,130)
Services & Other Gross Profit$ (7)$ 56$ 86$ 116$ 146$ 176$ 206$ 236
Services & Other Gross Margin %-0.5%3.8%5.3%6.6%7.6%8.5%9.3%10.0%
Income Tax provision$ (346)$ (205)$ (600)$ (1,200)$ (1,700)$ (2,200)$ (2,500)$ (3,000)
Share count fully diluted (B)3.4713.4653.5193.5733.6273.6813.7353.789
GAAP Net Income$ 3.32$ 2.26$ 4.57$ 7.39$ 9.91$ 12.64$ 15.04$ 17.73
GAAP Earnings per Share$ 0.96$ 0.65$ 1.30$ 2.07$ 2.73$ 3.43$ 4.03$ 4.68
Non-GAAP Earnings per Share$ 1.08$ 0.76$ 1.40$ 2.17$ 2.83$ 3.53$ 4.12$ 4.77

Neither investment nor financial advice. Just my model.
 
Last edited:
This inspired me to look into Amazon's financials and other companies valued more than Tesla. I think you're right here.

Amazon compared to Tesla:
  • 2x less revenue compound annual growth rate
  • Gross margin % in low 40s, about equal to where Tesla will be in 2024 with new factories ramped up
  • 2-3x less operating/net margin, and Tesla's lead is widening due to operating leverage increasing
  • Heavy competition in online retail segment and moderate threat from Microsoft Azure in cloud services, vs Tesla being absurdly far ahead of competitors
Here are the rough numbers for Amazon before the recent slowdown in the last year:

Growth
Revenue: 30% per year​
Earnings per share: 80% per year​
Operating Income: 80% per year​
Margins:
Gross: 42%​
Operating: 4 to 6%​

Income:
Gross: $200B​
Operating: $30B​

View attachment 851727
View attachment 851795

Right now my Tesla model for 2023 has deliveries of 2.8M and gross profit per car rising into the low-to-mid $20k range as Tesla improves on both the revenue and cost sides of the equation. Opex will stay under $8B I think. I've recently incorporated the $45/kWh US tax credit for batteries to cost on both cars from Fremont and Austin and also stationary storage, which has a big impact on margins. My thesis hasn't significantly changed from earlier this year other than the US sustainable energy tax advantages being finalized. I'm just trying to estimate the impact of the remaining price rises, mix shift, cost savings, etc.

The combined effect is a profit bonanza of $55B GAAP net income. I almost can't believe it but I derived each number independently of the others as best I could and I've spent months trying to figure out if I've lost my mind yet I keep getting similar results.

So I'm projecting Tesla to crush Amazon on earnings next year in addition to the better growth and margins, but as of today Amazon has a market cap more than 30% higher than Tesla's. How much longer can this last? How much longer until Tesla has the highest market cap?

View attachment 851830

  • Apple makes steady profit with good margins but they're growing slowly. It took them 4 years to double net income from $50B to $100B, and that happened mainly because of a spike in 2020.
View attachment 851858
  • Saudi Aramco is in an industry facing secular decline towards extinction with no hope of long-term salvation, and their products are commodities with wildly variable prices. Tesla's rise will make this reality increasingly obvious over the next few years. It looks like the long-feared Peak Oil quietly happened in 2019 without much fanfare.
View attachment 851855

View attachment 851857

  • Microsoft and Alphabet have similar financials with about $75B annual earnings growing about 40% per year or so. They've both been doubling earnings every 2-3 years. Excellent, but still much slower than Tesla. They also have good margins, but less than where Tesla will be in 2023 according to my projections.

So there really is no one and nothing stopping Tesla from becoming the world's most valuable company within the next two years in my opinion. When Tesla gets to Microsoft and Alphabet level earnings by around 2024 and are still showing growth above 50% per year, it's hard to see Tesla shooting to #1 at around $3T market cap.

Q1 2022Q2 2022Q3 2022Q4 2022Q1 2023Q2 2023Q3 2023Q4 2023
Vehicle deliveries310,048254,695371,752489,457578,123668,171735,556813,516
Auto Rev excl ZEV creds$ 16,182$ 14,258$ 20,804$ 28,389$ 34,109$ 40,090$ 44,869$ 50,438
Auto CoGS$ (11,322)$ (10,521)$ (14,672)$ (19,073)$ (21,951)$ (25,026)$ (27,159)$ (29,602)
ZEV Credits$ 679$ 344$ 420$ 469$ 469$ 469$ 469$ 469
ZEV cred rev per veh$ 2.2$ 1.4$ 1.1$ 1.0$ 0.8$ 0.7$ 0.6$ 0.6
Auto Gross Profit excl ZEV creds$ 4,860$ 3,737$ 6,131$ 9,315$ 12,158$ 15,064$ 17,710$ 20,836
Avg Rev per Vehicle excl ZEV creds$ 52.2$ 56.0$ 56.0$ 58.0$ 59.0$ 60.0$ 61.0$ 62.0
Avg CoGS per Vehicle$ (36.5)$ (41.3)$ (39.5)$ (39.0)$ (38.0)$ (37.5)$ (36.9)$ (36.4)
Avg Gross Profit per Vehicle excl ZEV creds$ 15.7$ 14.7$ 16.5$ 19.0$ 21.0$ 22.5$ 24.1$ 25.6
Gross Margin excl ZEV creds30.0%26.2%29.5%32.8%35.6%37.6%39.5%41.3%
Auto Rev$ 16,861$ 14,602$ 21,223$ 28,857$ 34,578$ 40,559$ 45,338$ 50,907
Auto Gross Profit$ 5,539$ 4,081$ 6,551$ 9,784$ 12,627$ 15,533$ 18,178$ 21,305
Avg Rev per Veh$ 54.4$ 57.3$ 57.1$ 59.0$ 59.8$ 60.7$ 61.6$ 62.6
Avg Gross Profit per Veh$ 17.9$ 16.0$ 17.6$ 20.0$ 21.8$ 23.2$ 24.7$ 26.2
Auto Gross Margin32.9%27.9%30.9%33.9%36.5%38.3%40.1%41.9%
Research & Development$ (865)$ (667)$ (700)$ (735)$ (772)$ (811)$ (851)$ (894)
Selling, General & Administrative$ (992)$ (961)$ (990)$ (1,020)$ (1,050)$ (1,082)$ (1,114)$ (1,147)
Restructuring & Other$ -$ (142)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -
Total Operating Expenses$ (1,857)$ (1,770)$ (1,690)$ (1,755)$ (1,822)$ (1,892)$ (1,965)$ (2,041)
OpEx as % of Auto Gross Profit34%43%26%18%14%12%11%10%
Energy Generation and Storage Rev$ 616$ 866$ 1,299$ 1,949$ 2,923$ 4,384$ 4,823$ 5,305
Energy Gen and Store Cost$ (688)$ (769)$ (1,077)$ (1,507)$ (2,261)$ (3,391)$ (3,730)$ (4,103)
Energy Gen and Store Gross Profit$ (72)$ 97$ 222$ 441$ 662$ 993$ 1,092$ 1,201
Energy Gen and Store Gross Margin %-12%11%17%23%23%23%23%23%
Services & Other Rev$ 1,279$ 1,466$ 1,616$ 1,766$ 1,916$ 2,066$ 2,216$ 2,366
Services & Other Cost$ (1,286)$ (1,410)$ (1,530)$ (1,650)$ (1,770)$ (1,890)$ (2,010)$ (2,130)
Services & Other Gross Profit$ (7)$ 56$ 86$ 116$ 146$ 176$ 206$ 236
Services & Other Gross Margin %-0.5%3.8%5.3%6.6%7.6%8.5%9.3%10.0%
Income Tax provision$ (346)$ (205)$ (600)$ (1,200)$ (1,700)$ (2,200)$ (2,500)$ (3,000)
Share count fully diluted (B)3.4713.4653.5193.5733.6273.6813.7353.789
GAAP Net Income$ 3.32$ 2.26$ 4.57$ 7.39$ 9.91$ 12.64$ 15.04$ 17.73
GAAP Earnings per Share$ 0.96$ 0.65$ 1.30$ 2.07$ 2.73$ 3.43$ 4.03$ 4.68
Non-GAAP Earnings per Share$ 1.08$ 0.76$ 1.40$ 2.17$ 2.83$ 3.53$ 4.12$ 4.77

Neither investment nor financial advice. Just my model.

Good analysis. Not as good as my Q42023 $5 EPS model but I won't show it to avoid embarrassing you.
 
Margins:
Gross: 42%
I think it mainly comes down to this number which Tesla will surpass next year and when it does (NOT if) and it passes Apple, we get to be the most valuable company on the planet as the growth rate might be continuing to get higher. And I don't believe you've included Tesla recognizing FSD monies in your model?

(And now I'm going to go drive 10.69.2)
 
While it doesn't contain a release date, this writeup from Airstream is pretty informative:
What I hate about the so-called Airstream, is that the aerodynamics of it are not early as good as the name says it is. They could have kept a lot of the interior space instead of narrowing the whole thing by 8" and instead focus on tapering the rear of the trailer so it leaves less of a wake.

It's like the Yakima SkyBox and other roof racks that actually perform better aerodynamically backwards than forwards because they put the round, bulbous end of the box at the rear and the slim, tapered end of the box at the front when it should be the other way around.

This could present itself as a useful adjacent market for Tesla to enter with minimal resources, though admittedly, likely with limited revenue, it would augment Tesla's core markets.
  • Actual, aerodynamic trailer designs that work well with Tesla vehicles
  • Actual, aerodynamic cargo accessories that work well with Tesla vehicles
  • Etc...
A lot of people would appreciate accessories like this to augment Tesla's capabilities on road trips and for fun. Do it! I bet Tesla would sell a ton of these.
 
What I hate about the so-called Airstream, is that the aerodynamics of it are not early as good as the name says it is. They could have kept a lot of the interior space instead of narrowing the whole thing by 8" and instead focus on tapering the rear of the trailer so it leaves less of a wake.

It's like the Yakima SkyBox and other roof racks that actually perform better aerodynamically backwards than forwards because they put the round, bulbous end of the box at the rear and the slim, tapered end of the box at the front when it should be the other way around.

This could present itself as a useful adjacent market for Tesla to enter with minimal resources, though admittedly, likely with limited revenue, it would augment Tesla's core markets.
  • Actual, aerodynamic trailer designs that work well with Tesla vehicles
  • Actual, aerodynamic cargo accessories that work well with Tesla vehicles
  • Etc...
A lot of people would appreciate accessories like this to augment Tesla's capabilities on road trips and for fun. Do it! I bet Tesla would sell a ton of these.
I agree with your thoughts when it comes to aerodynamics on this prototype; however, if you took at both the Basecamp model I referenced earlier and also the Bambi(?), it looks like they've done exactly what you mentioned around the backend. Hopefully they'll incorporate those aerodynamic aspects when they eventually release the e-Stream.

Edit: Rather than Tesla building campers and the like, I think it would far more sense for them to build a trailer for the Semi which incorporates the Drive functions of the e-Stream. It just makes sense.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dave EV
I'm not sure where you're getting the numbers for being up 22%. Depending on how you measure it, TSLA is down significantly year to date. I would measure it from close on 12/31, which means it is down about 15%

12/31/2021352.26
1/3/2022399.93

Where did I say "year-to-date"? Since when is a "year" 254 days long? Did you not look at the chart which goes back 365 days and shows TSLA up 22.11% in the last year?

1663024868669.png

I know we feel it hasn't been a great year for TSLA. but in fact we're up 22% (nothin' to sneeze at), and TSLA is best among tech cos.:

View attachment 851690

And think about all the Meta investors! TSLA is now worth more than double what used to be Facebook:

View attachment 851709

In financial terms, that's not "year" like in my post, it's year-to-date (YTD), or possibly "year so far". Why are people so argumentative on this forum?? Why don't you create your own post about how crummy TSLA has been year-to-date instead of suggesting I made a mistake? (sheesh)

Please read posts before posting a knee-jerk reaction.
 
Where did I say "year-to-date"? Since when is a "year" 254 days long? Did you not look at the chart which goes back 365 days and shows TSLA up 22.11% in the last year?

View attachment 851866




Please read posts before posting a knee-jerk reaction.

Thank you for clarifying. My mistake. When I saw "been a great year" I interpreted that as "year to date" not "in the past calendar year"
 
Good analysis. Not as good as my Q42023 $5 EPS model but I won't show it to avoid embarrassing you.
No risk of embarrassment. I found a typo in my auto cost column that wasn't calculating the $45/kWh tax credit for Austin cars, only Fremont ones. I edited the table as follows. I get $5/share in Q4 2023 now too :)

Q1 2022Q2 2022Q3 2022Q4 2022Q1 2023Q2 2023Q3 2023Q4 2023
Vehicle deliveries310,048254,695371,752489,457578,123668,171735,556813,516
Auto Rev excl ZEV creds$ 16,182$ 14,258$ 20,804$ 28,389$ 34,109$ 40,090$ 44,869$ 50,438
Auto CoGS$ (11,322)$ (10,521)$ (14,672)$ (19,073)$ (21,391)$ (24,246)$ (26,216)$ (28,460)
ZEV Credits$ 679$ 344$ 525$ 584$ 584$ 584$ 584$ 584
ZEV cred rev per veh$ 2.2$ 1.4$ 1.4$ 1.2$ 1.0$ 0.9$ 0.8$ 0.7
Auto Gross Profit excl ZEV creds$ 4,860$ 3,737$ 6,131$ 9,315$ 12,718$ 15,845$ 18,653$ 21,978
Avg Rev per Vehicle excl ZEV creds$ 52.2$ 56.0$ 56.0$ 58.0$ 59.0$ 60.0$ 61.0$ 62.0
Avg CoGS per Vehicle$ (36.5)$ (41.3)$ (39.5)$ (39.0)$ (37.0)$ (36.3)$ (35.6)$ (35.0)
Avg Gross Profit per Vehicle excl ZEV creds$ 15.7$ 14.7$ 16.5$ 19.0$ 22.0$ 23.7$ 25.4$ 27.0
Gross Margin excl ZEV creds30.0%26.2%29.5%32.8%37.3%39.5%41.6%43.6%
Auto Rev$ 16,861$ 14,602$ 21,328$ 28,972$ 34,693$ 40,674$ 45,453$ 51,022
Auto Gross Profit$ 5,539$ 4,081$ 6,656$ 9,899$ 13,302$ 16,429$ 19,237$ 22,562
Avg Rev per Veh$ 54.4$ 57.3$ 57.4$ 59.2$ 60.0$ 60.9$ 61.8$ 62.7
Avg Gross Profit per Veh$ 17.9$ 16.0$ 17.9$ 20.2$ 23.0$ 24.6$ 26.2$ 27.7
Auto Gross Margin32.9%27.9%31.2%34.2%38.3%40.4%42.3%44.2%
Research & Development$ (865)$ (667)$ (700)$ (735)$ (772)$ (811)$ (851)$ (894)
Selling, General & Administrative$ (992)$ (961)$ (990)$ (1,020)$ (1,050)$ (1,082)$ (1,114)$ (1,147)
Restructuring & Other$ -$ (142)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -
Total Operating Expenses$ (1,857)$ (1,770)$ (1,690)$ (1,755)$ (1,822)$ (1,892)$ (1,965)$ (2,041)
OpEx as % of Auto Gross Profit34%43%25%18%14%12%10%9%
Energy Generation and Storage Rev$ 616$ 866$ 1,299$ 1,949$ 2,923$ 4,384$ 4,823$ 5,305
Energy Gen and Store Cost$ (688)$ (769)$ (1,077)$ (1,507)$ (2,261)$ (3,391)$ (3,730)$ (4,103)
Energy Gen and Store Gross Profit$ (72)$ 97$ 222$ 441$ 662$ 993$ 1,092$ 1,201
Energy Gen and Store Gross Margin %-12%11%17%23%23%23%23%23%
Services & Other Rev$ 1,279$ 1,466$ 1,616$ 1,766$ 1,916$ 2,066$ 2,216$ 2,366
Services & Other Cost$ (1,286)$ (1,410)$ (1,530)$ (1,650)$ (1,770)$ (1,890)$ (2,010)$ (2,130)
Services & Other Gross Profit$ (7)$ 56$ 86$ 116$ 146$ 176$ 206$ 236
Services & Other Gross Margin %-0.5%3.8%5.3%6.6%7.6%8.5%9.3%10.0%
Income Tax provision$ (346)$ (205)$ (600)$ (1,200)$ (1,700)$ (2,200)$ (2,500)$ (3,000)
Share count fully diluted (B)3.4713.4653.5193.5733.6273.6813.7353.789
GAAP Net Income$ 3.32$ 2.26$ 4.67$ 7.50$ 10.59$ 13.51$ 16.07$ 18.96
GAAP Earnings per Share$ 0.96$ 0.65$ 1.33$ 2.10$ 2.92$ 3.67$ 4.30$ 5.00
 
So if chips and cells are not the limiting factor then what is?
I'd assume manufacturing capacity at Austin and Berlin. They are still ramping up and don't have those factories dialed in yet since they are new.

If the production rate at those two factories increases quickly I would assume they will once again be battery constrained. I am hoping it is a balance of the two and they use up all manufacturing capacity available everywhere for maximum output.

Elimination of bottlenecks is a great thing!