Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
The exception is for me to make the point that your proposed 'work-around' of simply exporting more cars runs head-on into my observation that over the next 4-5 years that is what China will also be doing one way or another.
Just to clarify the "work-around" is simply to sell each car produced for the highest price and the best margin, and it is only a short term thing.

Eventually I think Tesla will need the Gen3 car in China,

Chinese exports may hit issues with tariffs, deliveries and service, maybe just enough to render the "work-around" viable for 2-3 years.

There are also a lot of ICE sales to displace.

Overall the main difference in our opinions is, I think Tesla can hold margins a bit higher for a bit longer.
 
No it hasn't. Website delivery estimate times are back up to 4-8 weeks. That was just an end-of-quarter rush with challenging logistics. Tesla chose NOT to pay extra expedite fees for what amounts to a few weeks earlier delivery. Likely made MORE money by taking the cheaper delivery route but keeping full retail prices.

This is the first time that Tesla has ever chosen to do this. That means they've ALREADY massively overperformed financially for Q3 when the decision was made. That is BULLISH.
As I posted earlier, delivery is 4 to 6 weeks due to Shanghai exporting the first month of production. That is different than a big increase in units backlogged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZeApelido
I expect that Pepsi will get the entirety of their order on Dec 1st. Then, we'll see the next order filled in a matter of weeks. Then we'll be able to ascertain the production ramp. Other than that, we can all speculate until we are blue in the face.

Did you see the planned expansion at Giga Nevada, specifically one more building segment being added entirely for Panasonic battery cell production? And with both Powerwall and Megapack production moving to Lanthrop, CA I suspect that Reno will be the base for Tesla Semi production for at least a few years, and they'll be 2170-based packs.

That means Giga Texas 4680s will go to Cybertruck, and completion of the new cathode plant will not be a limiting factor for Semi. Martin Viecha said 'for the first time, Tesla has all the battery cells we need'. I believe him.
 
More info on requirements and timing from Alexandra. She used to work for Moody’s.

625BD9D0-53EA-4AA9-B8D9-BAF82613BD6A.jpeg
 
The demand concern is from China, not the U.S.

This poster wrote a pretty informative piece on the situation in China where the 3/Y competitors are fiercely trying to take marketshare under cutting Tesla on price while adding more stuff.

So it's not a huge concern since 20M cars are sold in China/year and all this competition including Tesla accounts for like 5% of sales. There are plenty of cake for everyone. However I do believe people are looking at this wrong and sees the competition as a bad thing. The competition is actually giving us insight into how much they have to do just to push their cars out for revenue. All of these companies beside BYD are not making a profit. And BYD is only making a 3% profit margin while Tesla is like 5x of this(probably 8x if Tesla just sold cars in China with the gigafactory). So yes these cars are adding 5 screens, Nvidia chips, foot massagers, whatever...while Tesla is taking out sensors and doing gigacasting. Seems like there's only one company here trying to be profitable while the others are bleeding investor's cash.



This was outstanding perspective for me. Helps to keep us bulls grounded. I think Tesla has an unassailable COGS lead due to their commitment to constantly and truly innovate their manufacturing. I thought GM and profitably was the ultimate metric...But I didn't consider state sponsored competition, certainly not so many of them! China has often been recognized for their long term thinking and end-goal market strategy, so I'm not sure how deep they're willing to allow their pockets to go while they bankroll competitors to artificially challenge Tesla way beyond what a non state sponsored competitor would possibly survive. The Chinese market will indeed be far more complex than I thought!
 
Last edited:
As I posted earlier, delivery is 4 to 6 weeks due to Shanghai exporting the first month of production. That is different than a big increase in units backlogged.

You said 'demand cratered' in China:

I believe 90% of the price action is due to China demand concerns. China is a big market for Tesla and China's backlog has cratered.
#368,418

Demand hasn't cratered. Full stop.
 
Looks like Wall Street’s making a few suckers out of people today.

It’s a shame for those who are (supposedly) selling today. I feel bad for you—but I won’t feel *too* bad that you’ll end up missing out on the stock of a century. That’s a burden you’ll have to carry on your own—you’ll have to live with that decision for the rest of your life.

Less than a year ago we were over $400 (split-adjusted). Nothing about Tesla has changed, except the CEO decided to waste his money on some nonsense, and some Russian a-hole decided to show everyone how tiny his winkie really is. Does that affect Tesla? Nope. I’m just as confident in them now as ever.

Folks are letting Wall Street shenanigans get into their head. A few short weeks ago everyone was talking about Tesla’s insatiable demand, and now due to some rumor which Tesla directly denied, the sky is falling?

Sorry, hedgies. Sorry, MMs. I’m not stupid. Not falling for it, and you ain’t getting my shares. Only from my cold dead hands…
No r
And a 500 mile EV is really 300 miles at highway speeds and fully charged
And a 500 mile EV is really 300 miles at highway speeds.
No remember the presentation replay the video they said 500 miles with highway speeds and fully charged
 
You said 'demand cratered' in China:


#368,418

Demand hasn't cratered. Full stop.
To clarify, I wrote there are ‘demand concerns’. I never wrote ‘demand cratered’. I point out one of the most solid data fanning that concern. China order backlogs. Troy has been tracking this and the data is not pretty.

Neither I nor Troy would say demand cratered because we don’t know that. We can only look at data points.
 
I said the backlog has cratered. I am relying Troy Teslike posting.

You shouldn’t completely rely on @Troy. He has constructed a model in which he calculates the order backlog by looking at wait times for all models on all continents. In September wait times in China shrunk to 1 week because that’s the month in which around 80k cars for the domestic market were delivered.

In October almost all of Shanghai’s production is exported and few cars will be delivered to Chinese customers, which had caused wait times to go up to 4-6 weeks again. Did the order backlog suddenly increase on October 1st? No, it didn’t. But Troy’s calculation will show it did (because of the way it works). Just like it showed that backlog dropped in September. Both are not true, as the backlog is pretty steady and if it declines it declines gradually.

I know Troy probably means well, but his model is flawed.
 
You shouldn’t completely rely on @Troy. He has constructed a model in which he calculates the order backlog by looking at wait times for all models on all continents. In September wait times in China shrunk to 1 week because that’s the month in which around 80k cars for the domestic market were delivered.

In October almost all of Shanghai’s production is exported and few cars will be delivered to Chinese customers, which had caused wait times to go up to 4-6 weeks again. Did the order backlog suddenly increase on October 1st? No, it didn’t. But Troy’s calculation will show it did (because of the way it works). Just like it showed that backlog dropped in September. Both are not true, as the backlog is pretty steady and if it declines it declines gradually.

I know Troy probably means well, but his model is flawed.
Thanks and very good point. We should never rely on one source.

Let’s see what Troy does with his numbers. He is well aware of the October exporting.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: dhanson865
New info from Rob TeslaDaily podcast that Elon’s lawyer said Twitter offered a reduction of several billion with some conditions. Elon refused and offered the original price and conditions.

This is interesting because Twitter then decided to continue with the court case.

My guess is that Twitter conditions included removal of the debt finance clause which of course is a no-go for Elon.

As of now all the backers are still supporting the purchase based on what we know, but I hope once all the discovery are complete some backers withdraw which gives Elon an out so he can pay the $1B fee then make a new offer at significantly lower price (50% off?) that Twitter will accept.
 


What I understand now is that Tesla has a demand problem if they don’t have 1 year backlog from the Media point of view. The way I see it is that they will finally have battery capacity for Tesla semi, Cybertruck and power wall & mega pack production. It would be interesting to know there is a Model 2 into the design room. Not to announce it officially to avoid Osbourning the sales of Model 3 and Model Y in Chinal but at least to know there will be a car available to the masses once the luxury car China sector is filled up
 
Forward Observing

“You Need to know What’s happening in China”

The general takeaway from my reading of that author was; will the consumer be left holding the bag, and, and that is some serious competition.

Seriously, not all startups or legacy automakers will come out alive; thus the consumers will be left with their very own “Pet Rock.”

The only, IMhumbleO, competitor is VW and maybe Ford Riven. Yes, there are other startups that may continue to pull rabbits out of the dark corners of their minds, but jumping to light speed takes time, money and, well energy. VW acknowledged Tesla and the vision when they bought a Model S and tore it a-part bolt, by bolt and battery cell, by battery cell. The problem with Western thinking is that they deserve the tile or trophy.

Legacy automakers survived Toyota’s entry into the Western market back in the seventies (that was when I became aware of them). However, today they think like the typical older legacy automakers. Also remember I said, “survived.”

Which automakers are household manufacturers when talking to the grandkids about solar storage, solar cells/roof, and reinventing your house from gas primary to electrical, on, and on. GM ~ got tanks? I said, household damn it. Oh yeah, Starlink for their hand held devices.

Cheers
 
Let me add my informed viewpoint:

THIS SUCKS LIKE A FARE THEE WELL!!!

not /s
The MM’s psychological operation has certainly been in full effect with their ability to dump TSLA share price through the week below the 3-year trend line. Stay strong @wipster - Today we may see that the most frustrating part of this week’s possible manipulation head fake for those of us that follow the share price by the minute is that if the MM’s simply let TSLA run back up above the 3 year trend line before close of trading today then it will never even look like TSLA traded below the converging wedge of the 1-year and 3-year charts on the longer charts. Thus they may once again have managed to take TSLA as low as they possibly could have before a breakout to the upside on earnings…….allowing them to make an additional 20% or more on the move than the rest of us that simply held the last few weeks, and creating enough fear in the process that they probably managed to gather up a few more bucket loads of shares from the unfortunate at much lower costs before the ride back up.

Certainly not an advice - just another reminder that they have successfully done this many, many times in the past .
 
The MM’s psychological operation has certainly been in full effect with their ability to dump TSLA share price through the week below the 3-year trend line. Stay strong @wipster - Today we may see that the most frustrating part of this week’s possible manipulation head fake for those of us that follow the share price by the minute is that if the MM’s simply let TSLA run back up above the 3 year trend line before close of trading today then it will never even look like TSLA traded below the converging wedge of the 1-year and 3-year charts on the longer charts. Thus they may once again have managed to take TSLA as low as they possibly could have before a breakout to the upside on earnings…….allowing them to make an additional 20% or more on the move than the rest of us that simply held the last few weeks, and creating enough fear in the process that they probably managed to gather up a few more bucket loads of shares from the unfortunate at much lower costs before the ride back up.

Certainly not an advice - just another reminder that they have successfully done this many, many times in the past .

if TSLA is trading below a 3yr trend line, it is not b/c of market manipulation, it is b/c of market agreement.
 
...Therefore over the next 4-5 years Tesla will run up against [Chinese competitors] in other (export) locations. It is that effect I am trying to understand as it will have consequences....

Again, how could Chinese carmakers threaten Tesla sales if Tesla has FSD and they don't? Are you aware of any Chinese competitors building a global self-driving AI based on billions of miles of driving data and low-cost cameras? Or does your modeling assume Tesla will not complete FSD in the next 4-5 years?