If Tesla is the only domestic auto company, does that make it more or less likely to be a victim of anti-trust law? That's the point. I think it's odd that anyone would desire that outcome, even Elon doesn't.
They've all had their chances to adopt. Instead what did these legacies do? They laughed at Tesla, made bets against it, colluded with big oil, made deals with administrations, the list of negatives is large. At the end of the day, they did not do what is best for the global mission, in fact some doing the opposite so if they fail there is no one to blame but themselves.
If they fail I won't lose any sleep at night. In fact in many ways they deserve to fail for their poor performance. When Tesla went the route of vertical integration on battery production, seat production, etc legacies literally laughed at them.
They are not going to have my sympathies now that they threw away years when they could have followed the path set by Tesla. Instead they ignored Tesla at their peril.
Also, FYI having huge pricing power is not anti-competitive either. Look at Amazon, they have huge pricing power, but they got in trouble because they forced their 3rd party sellers to not under-cut them, that is illegal. Thus this whole path that you're own is poor form imo.
Let's not also forget the BS legacies have put in place to prevent Tesla from conducting normal business, like using their dealership model to change laws to prevent direct sales. Sympathy... lmao.
Oh one more thing. Tesla has been open with their process and more importantly patents. Musk has stated repeatedly, patents are for losers. Come use our patents, etc etc. He's gone and helped when asked like meeting VW's board to help them change. <---But what did these clowns do? They fired the CEO trying to change them. You cannot make this *sugar* up!